Numerical Analysis of Model Parameter Uncertainties as a Result of Experimental Uncertainty — An Example from Preparative Chromatography

Abstract Model calibration, and in particular model parameter uncertainty caused by experimental errors, is the focus of this work. Computer simulations were used to design a purification step for insulin by reversed-phase chromatography. The effect of errors in the protein sample concentration and purity, and in the modifier concentration in the sample, equilibration, and elution buffers was studied on the calibration of the adsorption kinetic parameters by the inverse method. The overall error, including experimental errors, was not normally distributed and not uncorrelated. Monte Carlo simulations were performed where the calibrated model was used to generate new data sets and a random error was added on the experimental conditions. New model parameter sets were found by recalibrating the model to the data sets from Monte Carlo simulations and the model parameter covariances were estimated from these. A control strategy which was robust to uncertainty in both model and process was designed from the resulting model parameter distribution and the expected variations in the process variables.

[1]  A Kremling,et al.  Exploiting the bootstrap method for quantifying parameter confidence intervals in dynamical systems. , 2006, Metabolic engineering.

[2]  Marcus Degerman,et al.  Pooling control in variable preparative chromatography processes , 2010, Bioprocess and biosystems engineering.

[3]  J A Asenjo,et al.  Application of chromatographic theory for process characterization towards validation of an ion‐exchange operation , 2007, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[4]  Niklas Andersson,et al.  Supporting Design and Control of a Reversed‐Phase Chromatography Step by Mechanistic Modeling , 2012 .

[5]  Marcus Degerman,et al.  Constrained optimization of a preparative ion-exchange step for antibody purification. , 2004, Journal of chromatography. A.

[6]  G. Guiochon,et al.  Separation science is the key to successful biopharmaceuticals. , 2011, Journal of chromatography. A.

[7]  J. Selker,et al.  Numerical estimation of multicomponent adsorption isotherms in preparative chromatography: implications of experimental error. , 2001, Journal of chromatography. A.

[8]  Georges Guiochon,et al.  Preparative liquid chromatography. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. A.

[9]  T. Fornstedt,et al.  Highlighting Important Parameters Often Neglected in Numerical Optimization of Preparative Chromatography , 2012 .

[10]  P. Sajonz Influence of the column hold-up time measurement accuracy on the prediction of chromatographic band profiles. , 2004, Journal of chromatography. A.

[11]  Marcus Degerman,et al.  Determining Critical Process Parameters and Process Robustness in Preparative Chromatography - A Model-Based Approach , 2009 .

[12]  J A Asenjo,et al.  Mathematical modeling of elution curves for a protein mixture in ion exchange chromatography and for the optimal selection of operational conditions , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[13]  Anita M. Katti,et al.  Fundamentals of Preparative and Nonlinear Chromatography , 1994 .