The effects of reward structure, media richness and gender on virtual teams

This study explores the dynamics of virtual teams. We hypothesize that the use of a mixed-incentive reward structure will increase team member satisfaction, affect group cohesion and decrease perceived social loafing in a virtual team environment. We also hypothesize that team member satisfaction and team cohesion will increase and perceived social loafing will decrease with the use of a richer technology medium in a virtual team environment. In addition, we hypothesize that in a virtual team environment, team member satisfaction, group cohesion and perceived social loafing will differ between males and females. Using eighty-nine MBA students at a large southeastern university as participant's for our study, we find that perceived social loafing decreases with the use of a mixed-incentive reward structure in a virtual team environment. We also find that perceived social loafing decreases with the use of a richer technology medium in a virtual team environment. Finally, we find that perceived social loafing differs between males and females and that females perceive more social loafing when there is not a mixed-incentive scheme. The results shed light on the role of gender in virtual teams.

[1]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[2]  R. Liden,et al.  Understanding Social Loafing: The Role of Justice Perceptions and Exchange Relationships , 2003 .

[3]  Yu-Ting Caisy Hung,et al.  Gender Differences in the Effects of Media Richness , 1999 .

[4]  Carl E. Larson,et al.  Teamwork: What Must Go Right/What Can Go Wrong , 1989 .

[5]  M. Lind The gender impact of temporary virtual work groups , 1999 .

[6]  J. McGrath Social Psychology: A Brief Introduction , 1964 .

[7]  N. K. Muir,et al.  The Richness Imperative and Cognitive Style , 1990 .

[8]  Ramón Rico,et al.  Effects of task interdependence and type of communication on performance in virtual teams , 2005 .

[9]  Jennifer Blaskovich,et al.  Exploring the Effect of Distance: An Experimental Investigation of Virtual Collaboration, Social Loafing, and Group Decisions , 2008, J. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Liz Lee-Kelley,et al.  Locus of control and attitudes to working in virtual teams , 2006 .

[11]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  Is Out of Sight, Out of Mind? An Empirical Study of Social Loafing in Technology-Supported Groups , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Adams Js Towards an understanding of inequity , 1963 .

[13]  Reza Barkhi,et al.  The influence of communication mode and incentive structure on GDSS process and outcomes , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[14]  B. Latané The psychology of social impact. , 1981 .

[15]  John Thibaut,et al.  A Theory of Procedure , 1978 .

[16]  Likoebe M. Maruping,et al.  Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: a task-technology fit perspective. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[17]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Supporting virtual team-building with a GSS: an empirical investigation , 2003, Decis. Support Syst..

[18]  S. Green,et al.  The effects of three social decision schemes on decision group process , 1980 .

[19]  Reza Barkhi,et al.  Information Exchange and Induced Cooperation in Group Decision Support Systems , 2005, Commun. Res..

[20]  Hayward P. Andres The Impact of Communication Medium on Virtual Team Group Process , 2006, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[21]  S. Harkins,et al.  The Role of Evaluation in Eliminating Social Loafing , 1985 .

[22]  Hayward P. Andres A comparison of face‐to‐face and virtual software development teams , 2002 .

[23]  Lucy Gilson,et al.  Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here? , 2004 .

[24]  Uday S. Murthy,et al.  Comparing Audit Team Effectiveness via Alternative Modes of Computer‐Mediated Communication , 2004 .

[25]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[26]  Francisco J. Román An analysis of changes to a team-based incentive plan and its effects on productivity, product quality, and absenteeism , 2009 .

[27]  Naoki Kugihara,et al.  Gender and Social Loafing in Japan , 1999 .

[28]  G. Leventhal,et al.  The Distribution of Rewards and Resources in Groups and Organizations , 1976 .

[29]  Janet Taylor Spence,et al.  Contemporary topics in social psychology , 1976 .

[30]  Frederick W. Rankin Coordinating Effort under Team-Based and Individual Incentives: An Experimental Analysis* , 2004 .

[31]  V. Druskat,et al.  Effects and timing of developmental peer appraisals in self-managing work groups. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[32]  J. Greenberg,et al.  A Taxonomy of Organizational Justice Theories , 1987 .

[33]  E. Salas,et al.  Virtual Teams: Effects of Technological Mediation on Team Performance , 2003 .

[34]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Group Decision Support Systems on Group Development , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[35]  R. H. Willis,et al.  Social Exchange: Advances In Theory And Research , 1981 .

[36]  V. Savicki,et al.  Gender, Group Composition, and Task Type in Small Task Groups Using Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[37]  R. Folger,et al.  Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to Pay Raise Decisions , 1989 .

[38]  P. Sweeney,et al.  Research Notes. Distributive and Procedural Justice as Predictors of Satisfaction with Personal and Organizational Outcomes , 1992 .

[39]  Francisco J. Gracia,et al.  Affective responses to work process and outcomes in virtual teams: Effects of communication media and time pressure , 2005 .

[40]  Jon R. Katzenbach,et al.  The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-Performance Organization , 1992 .

[41]  G. Leventhal What Should Be Done with Equity Theory , 1980 .

[42]  J. S. Adams,et al.  Inequity In Social Exchange , 1965 .

[43]  R. Daft,et al.  Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design , 1983 .

[44]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Testing Media Richness Theory in the New Media: The Effects of Cues, Feedback, and Task Equivocality , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[45]  R. Daft,et al.  Language and Organization , 1979 .

[46]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow , 1990 .

[47]  P. Sweeney,et al.  Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. , 1992 .

[48]  S. Seashore Group cohesiveness in the industrial work group , 1955 .

[49]  Warren E. Watson,et al.  Team Learning: a Potential Solution To the Problems of Large Classes , 1982 .

[50]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness , 1998, MIS Q..