An Actor‐Oriented and Context‐Specific Framework for Evaluating Climate Change Adaptation

Responding to recently identified challenges in the comprehensive evaluation of climate change adaptation, we suggest an assessment framework that incorporates a multidisciplinary viewpoint on adaptation. The framework combines three major components to link system-oriented concepts of risk and vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change with actor-oriented approaches of decision-making: the risk context, individual decision-making, and adaptation assessment. We have thereby developed an approach that is embedded in context and scale, takes an actor-oriented perspective, and is applicable to multiple evaluation approaches. We tested the framework empirically with a mixed-methods approach to assess adaptation in flood-exposed areas of the Vietnamese Mekong Delta. This has shown the distinct meanings of good adaptation and uncovered mismatches in choices for adaptation strategies and evaluations of those strategies across different actors hindering sustainable development.

[1]  Susanne C Moser,et al.  A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  T. Grothmann,et al.  People at Risk of Flooding: Why Some Residents Take Precautionary Action While Others Do Not , 2006 .

[3]  A. Patt,et al.  Adaptive capacity and human cognition: The process of individual adaptation to climate change , 2005 .

[4]  R. Kasperson,et al.  A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  E Ferguson,et al.  From comparative risk assessment to multi-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: recent developments and applications. , 2006, Environment international.

[6]  Frans Berkhout,et al.  Limits to adaptation , 2013 .

[7]  Luis A. Bojórquez-Tapia,et al.  Insights into the composition of household vulnerability from multicriteria decision analysis , 2008 .

[8]  C. D. Gamper,et al.  A conceptual approach to the use of Cost Benefit and Multi Criteria Analysis in natural hazard management , 2006 .

[9]  M. L. Carreño,et al.  Framing vulnerability, risk and societal responses: the MOVE framework , 2013, Natural Hazards.

[10]  Franc̦ois Fortier Taking a climate chance: a procedural critique of Vietnam's climate change strategy. , 2010, Asia Pacific viewpoint.

[11]  Johanna Wolf,et al.  A values‐based approach to vulnerability and adaptation to climate change , 2010 .