Evaluation of attenuation and scatter correction requirements as a function of object size in PET small animal imaging

In human emission tomography, an additional transmission scan is often required to obtain accurate attenuation maps for attenuation correction (AC) and scatter correction (SC). These methods have been translated to small animal imaging, although the impact of photon interactions on the reconstruction of mouse/rat images is substantially less than that in human imaging. In this study, we evaluate the requirement of these corrections for PET small animal imaging through Monte Carlo simulations of the Inveon PET scanner using MOBY voxelized phantoms scaled to different sizes (2.1–6.4 cm diameters). The 3D data were reconstructed in 6 different conditions depending on the attenuation map used: Accurate AC+SC, Simple AC+SC, Accurate AC only, Simple AC only, SC only and No correction. Mean error% for 8 different ROIs and 6 different MOBY sizes were obtained against the accurate reconstruction (first on the list). In addition, real mouse data obtained from an Inveon PET scanner were analyzed using similar methods. The results from simulations and real mouse data showed that attenuation correction based on solely emission data should be sufficient for imaging animals smaller than 4 cm diameter.

[1]  Martin Gotthardt,et al.  Spatial Resolution and Sensitivity of the Inveon Small-Animal PET Scanner , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  W. J. Lorenz,et al.  Performance evaluation of the whole-body PET scanner ECAT EXACT HR + , 1997 .

[3]  Simon R. Cherry,et al.  PET: Physics, Instrumentation, and Scanners , 2006 .

[4]  B. Schölkopf,et al.  Towards quantitative PET/MRI: a review of MR-based attenuation correction techniques , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[5]  Jogeshwar Mukherjee,et al.  Performance evaluation of an Inveon PET preclinical scanner , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Patrick L Chow,et al.  Attenuation correction for small animal PET tomographs , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Scatter Correction Strategies in Emission Tomography , 2006 .

[8]  S R Meikle,et al.  Validation of postinjection transmission measurements for attenuation correction in neurological FDG-PET studies. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  Eric C Frey,et al.  Development of a 4-D digital mouse phantom for molecular imaging research. , 2004, Molecular imaging and biology : MIB : the official publication of the Academy of Molecular Imaging.

[10]  A. Konik Evaluation of attenuation and scatter correction requirements in small animal PET and SPECT imaging , 2010 .

[11]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Atlas-guided non-uniform attenuation correction in cerebral 3D PET imaging , 2005, NeuroImage.

[12]  Gunnar Brix,et al.  Performance evaluation of the whole-body PET scanner ECAT EXACT HR/sup +/ , 1996, 1996 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record.

[13]  Arda Konik,et al.  GATE simulations of human and small animal PET for determination of scatter fraction as a function of object size , 2009 .

[14]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for PET/MRI: A Novel Approach Combining Pattern Recognition and Atlas Registration , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  D. Bailey Transmission scanning in emission tomography , 1998, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  C Lartizien,et al.  GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  J. Seidel,et al.  Attenuation correction for the NIH ATLAS small animal PET scanner , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[18]  S. Cherry,et al.  Observations regarding scatter fraction and NEC measurements for small animal PET , 2006, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[19]  M'hamed Bentourkia,et al.  Simultaneous Attenuation and Scatter Corrections in Small Animal PET Imaging , 2006, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.