Techno-economic assessment of triticale straw for power generation

Triticale, a hybrid between wheat and rye, has gained the attention of researchers as a feasible future energy crop for Canada. The study focuses on development of data intensive techno-economic model for assessment of triticale straw-based electricity generation, its optimum size and the GHG abatement potential through substitution of coal-based power on a commercial scale. Each of the unit operations required for utilization of triticale straw to power generation are developed and assessed. Direct combustion is the power generation technology considered due to its reliability and large-scale commercial availability. The cost of triticale straw-based power production via direct combustion is in the range of $76.33±4.76/MWh, at a boiler unit size of 300MW. The estimated carbon credit required for triticale straw based power plant to be competitive with coal based power is $16.4/MgCO2e. When the unit size of plant is unlimited, the optimum size of power plant and the cost of power are 595MW and $75.02/MWh, respectively.

[1]  R. Overend.  The average haul distance and transportation work factors for biomass delivered to a central plant , 1982 .

[2]  Shahab Sokhansanj,et al.  Large‐scale production, harvest and logistics of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) – current technology and envisioning a mature technology , 2009 .

[3]  M. Mehos,et al.  Planting the seed , 2009, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[4]  D. Moran,et al.  Farm-level constraints on the domestic supply of perennial energy crops in the UK , 2008 .

[5]  Roydon Andrew Fraser,et al.  Application of Monte Carlo analysis to life cycle assessment , 1999 .

[6]  P. Flynn,et al.  Rail vs truck transport of biomass. , 2006, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[7]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Framework for modelling data uncertainty in life cycle inventories , 2001 .

[8]  Roberto García,et al.  Characterization of Spanish biomass wastes for energy use. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[9]  R. L. Bain,et al.  Highlights of Biopower Technical Assessment: State of the Industry and the Technology , 2003 .

[10]  Aviel Verbruggen,et al.  Combined Heat and Power (CHP) essentials , 2007 .

[11]  Peter McKendry,et al.  Energy production from biomass (Part 2): Conversion technologies. , 2002, Bioresource technology.

[12]  Shahab Sokhansanj,et al.  Production and distribution of cereal straw on the canadian prairies , 2006 .

[13]  N. Uddin.  Techno-Economic Assessment of a Biomass-Based Cogeneration Plant with CO2 Capture and Storage , 2004 .

[14]  Amit Kumar,et al.  A Review of Techno-economics of Bio-hydrogen Production Technologies , 2007 .

[15]  J. Jechura,et al.  Biomass to Hydrogen Production Detailed Design and Economics Utilizing the Battelle Columbus Laboratory Indirectly-Heated Gasifier , 2005 .

[16]  R. L. Bain,et al.  Biopower Technical Assessment: State of the Industry and the Technology , 2003 .

[17]  Leonardo Barreto,et al.  Biomass-fired cogeneration systems with CO2 capture and storage , 2007 .

[18]  Peter C. Flynn,et al.  The impact of feedstock cost on technology selection and optimum size. , 2007 .

[19]  Mark Stumborg,et al.  Sustainability and economic issues for cereal crop residue export , 1996 .

[20]  P. Flynn,et al.  Biomass power cost and optimum plant size in western Canada , 2003 .

[21]  N. M. Idaikkadar,et al.  CHAPTER 10 – Census of Agriculture , 1979 .

[22]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  CO2 mitigation costs of large-scale bioenergy technologies in competitive electricity markets , 2003 .

[23]  Yield stability analysis of broadly adaptive triticale germplasm in southern and central Alberta, Canada, for industrial end-use suitability , 2011 .

[24]  L. Pedersen,et al.  Deposit characteristic after injection of additives to a Danish straw-fired suspension boiler , 2007 .

[25]  Shahab Sokhansanj,et al.  Analysis of five simulated straw harvest scenarios , 2008 .