Sex differences in viewing sexual stimuli: An eye-tracking study in men and women

Men and women exhibit different neural, genital, and subjective arousal responses to visual sexual stimuli. The source of these sex differences is unknown. We hypothesized that men and women look differently at sexual stimuli, resulting in different responses. We used eye tracking to measure looking by 15 male and 30 female (15 normal cycling (NC) and 15 oral contracepting (OC)) heterosexual adults viewing sexually explicit photos. NC Women were tested during their menstrual, periovulatory, and luteal phases while Men and OC Women were tested at equivalent intervals, producing three test sessions per individual. Men, NC, and OC Women differed in the relative amounts of first looks towards, percent time looking at, and probability of looking at, defined regions of the pictures. Men spent more time, and had a higher probability of, looking at female faces. NC Women had more first looks towards, spent more time, and had a higher probability of, looking at genitals. OC Women spent more time, and had a higher probability of, looking at contextual regions of pictures, those featuring clothing or background. Groups did not differ in looking at the female body. Menstrual cycle phase did not affect women's looking patterns. However, differences between OC and NC groups suggest hormonal influences on attention to sexual stimuli that were unexplained by subject characteristic differences. Our finding that men and women attend to different aspects of the same visual sexual stimuli could reflect pre-existing cognitive biases that possibly contribute to sex differences in neural, subjective, and physiological arousal.

[1]  D. Isaacowitz.  Motivated Gaze , 2006 .

[2]  R. Rosen,et al.  Self-report assessment of female sexual function: Psychometric evaluation of the brief index of sexual functioning for women , 1994, Archives of sexual behavior.

[3]  C. Worthman,et al.  Hormone measures in finger-prick blood spot samples: new field methods for reproductive endocrinology. , 1997, American journal of physical anthropology.

[4]  P. Castaño,et al.  Oral Contraceptives and Libido in Women , 2004, Annual review of sex research.

[5]  D. Barlow,et al.  A comparison of male and female patterns of sexual arousal , 1981, Archives of sexual behavior.

[6]  B. Fauser,et al.  Activity of the pituitary-ovarian axis in the pill-free interval during use of low-dose combined oral contraceptives. , 1999, Contraception.

[7]  R. Schiavi,et al.  Sexual Arousability and the Menstrual Cycle1 , 1981, Psychosomatic medicine.

[8]  Michael E. Holmes,et al.  Attention to repeated images on the World-Wide Web: Another look at scanpath theory , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[9]  Sarah K. Murnen,et al.  Gender and Self-Reported Sexual Arousal in Response to Sexual Stimuli: A Meta-Analytic Review , 1997 .

[10]  P. Boyle,et al.  Double duty for sex differences in the brain , 1998, Behavioural Brain Research.

[11]  E. Laan,et al.  Habituation of female sexual arousal to slides and film , 1995, Archives of sexual behavior.

[12]  Susan S. Hendrick,et al.  Multidimensionality of sexual attitudes , 1987 .

[13]  R. Frank.  Hormones and behavior , 1948 .

[14]  G. Schmidt.  Male-female differences in sexual arousal and behavior during and after exposure to sexually explicit stimuli. , 1975, Archives of sexual behavior.

[15]  A. Damasio,et al.  The role of scanpaths in facial recognition and learning , 1987, Annals of neurology.

[16]  K. Wallen.  Sex and Context: Hormones and Primate Sexual Motivation , 2001, Hormones and Behavior.

[17]  J. Bailey,et al.  A Sex Difference in the Specificity of Sexual Arousal , 2004, Psychological science.

[18]  S. Sanders,et al.  A prospective study of the effects of oral contraceptives on sexuality and well-being and their relationship to discontinuation. , 2001, Contraception.

[19]  S. Hamann,et al.  Men and women differ in amygdala response to visual sexual stimuli , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  A. Manatunga,et al.  Validity of self-reported menstrual cycle length. , 2007, Annals of epidemiology.

[21]  G. Alexander,et al.  Oral contraceptives, androgens, and the sexuality of young women: I. A comparison of sexual experience, sexual attitudes, and gender role in oral contraceptive users and nonusers , 1991, Archives of sexual behavior.

[22]  E. McClure.  A meta-analytic review of sex differences in facial expression processing and their development in infants, children, and adolescents. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  K. Carlström,et al.  Ovulation inhibition with a combined oral contraceptive containing 20 micrograms ethinyl estradiol and 250 micrograms levonorgestrel. Serum levels of the active ingredients and FSH, LH, estradiol 17-beta and progesterone. , 1979, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. Supplement.

[24]  A. Slob,et al.  Menstrual cycle phase and sexual arousability in women , 1991, Archives of sexual behavior.

[25]  Andrew T Duchowski,et al.  A breadth-first survey of eye-tracking applications , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[26]  S. M. Harvey,et al.  Female sexual behavior: fluctuations during the menstrual cycle. , 1987, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[27]  J. Hyönä,et al.  Eye movement assessment of selective attentional capture by emotional pictures. , 2006, Emotion.

[28]  Gretchen Kambe,et al.  Detection of Differential Viewing Patterns to Erotic and Non-Erotic Stimuli Using Eye-Tracking Methodology , 2006, Archives of sexual behavior.

[29]  Matt Field,et al.  Eye movements to smoking-related pictures in smokers: relationship between attentional biases and implicit and explicit measures of stimulus valence. , 2003, Addiction.

[30]  Lucy I Mullin,et al.  A female advantage in the recognition of emotional facial expressions: test of an evolutionary hypothesis , 2006 .

[31]  Steven Yantis,et al.  How visual salience wins the battle for awareness , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  M. McCabe,et al.  Sexual and emotional variables influencing sexual response to erotica. , 1997, Behaviour research and therapy.

[33]  G. Alexander.  An Evolutionary Perspective of Sex-Typed Toy Preferences: Pink, Blue, and the Brain , 2003, Archives of sexual behavior.

[34]  W. Hop,et al.  Sexual arousability and the menstrual cycle , 1996, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[35]  D. Mishell,et al.  Single luteal phase serum progesterone assay as an indicator of ovulation. , 1997, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[36]  K. Carlström,et al.  Serum Levels of FSH, LH, Estradiol-17β and Progesterone following the Administration of a Combined Oral Contraceptive Containing 20 μg Ethinylestradiol , 1978 .

[37]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[38]  Niels Birbaumer,et al.  Gender differences in response to pictures of nudes: a magnetoencephalographic study , 2003, Biological Psychology.

[39]  G. Alexander,et al.  Associations Among Gender-Linked Toy Preferences, Spatial Ability, and Digit Ratio: Evidence from Eye-Tracking Analysis , 2006, Archives of sexual behavior.

[40]  Erick Janssen,et al.  Selecting Films for Sex Research: Gender Differences in Erotic Film Preference , 2003, Archives of sexual behavior.

[41]  M. Hassebrauck.  THE VISUAL PROCESS METHOD : A NEW METHOD TO STUDY PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS , 1998 .

[42]  J. Henderson.  Human gaze control during real-world scene perception , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[43]  J. Geer,et al.  Cognitive factors in sexual arousal: the role of distraction. , 1976, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[44]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[45]  E. Laan,et al.  Women's sexual and emotional responses to male- and female-produced erotica , 1994, Archives of sexual behavior.

[46]  Emily Balcetis,et al.  See what you want to see: motivational influences on visual perception. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.