Fingerprint silicon Replicas: Static and Dynamic Features for Vitality Detection Using an Optical Capture Device

The automatic vitality detection of a fingerprint has become an important issue in personal verification systems based on this biometric. It has been shown that fake fingerprints made using materials like gelatine or silicon can deceive commonly used sensors. Recently, the extraction of vitality features from fingerprint images has been proposed to address this problem. Among others, static and dynamic features have been separately studied so far, thus their respective merits are not yet clear; especially because reported results were often obtained with different sensors and using small data sets which could have obscured relative merits, due to the potential small sample-size issues. In this paper, we compare some static and dynamic features by experiments on a larger data set and using the same optical sensor for the extraction of both feature sets. We dealt with fingerprint stamps made using liquid silicon rubber. Reported results show the relative merits of static and dynamic features and the performance improvement achievable by using such features together.

[1]  Y. S. Moon,et al.  Wavelet based fingerprint liveness detection , 2005 .

[2]  Marie Sandström Liveness Detection in Fingerprint Recognition Systems , 2004 .

[3]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Decision-Level Fusion in Fingerprint Verification , 2001, Multiple Classifier Systems.

[4]  Stephanie Schuckers,et al.  Determination of vitality from a non-invasive biomedical measurement for use in fingerprint scanners , 2003, Pattern Recognit..

[5]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Small Sample Size Effects in Statistical Pattern Recognition: Recommendations for Practitioners , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[6]  Arun Ross,et al.  A deformable model for fingerprint matching , 2005, Pattern Recognit..

[7]  Gian Luca Marcialis,et al.  Vitality Detection from Fingerprint Images: A Critical Survey , 2007, ICB.

[8]  Ton van der Putte,et al.  Biometrical Fingerprint Recognition: Don't Get Your Fingers Burned , 2001, CARDIS.

[10]  Dario Maio,et al.  A New Approach to Fake Finger Detection Based on Skin Distortion , 2006, ICB.

[11]  Gian Luca Marcialis,et al.  Analysis and Selection of Features for the Fingerprint Vitality Detection , 2006, SSPR/SPR.

[12]  Satoshi Hoshino,et al.  Impact of artificial "gummy" fingers on fingerprint systems , 2002, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[13]  Ola Pettersson,et al.  ECG analysis: a new approach in human identification , 2001, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas..

[14]  Stephanie Schuckers,et al.  Time-series detection of perspiration as a liveness test in fingerprint devices , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[15]  J. Fierrez-Aguilar,et al.  On the Vulnerability of Fingerprint Verification Systems to Fake Fingerprints Attacks , 2006, Proceedings 40th Annual 2006 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology.

[16]  Dario Maio,et al.  Fake Fingerprint Detection by Odor Analysis , 2006, ICB.