flow patterns. If they did use a constant rate infusion device, then the slow flow rate (< 3 mL/min) used would have produced a smooth, nonturbulent stream through a 22-gauge Whitacre needle (2). We have just completed a study looking at the distribution patterns of isothermal, isobaric methylene blue dye after injection at various flow rates through atraumatic spinal needles (Serpell MG, Gray WM, personal communication). With an open fluid tank, we have found that at high flow rates the injectate is rapidly dispersed and diluted. Conversely, at low flow rates, the injectate can travel for a similar or greater distance, but as a concentrated stream, before finally gradually dispersing by diffusion. When the experiment is repeated and a flat perspex plate is placed perpendicular to the needle, we found that with slow rates the injectate adhered to the plate and continued to travel further along in its original direction before the momentum ran out. The fast rates produced a turbulent pattern that whirled back from the surface of the plate and the distribution was less directional, with the dye spreading laterally and backwards to the initial direction. Our model is not intended to simulate that of the subarachnoid space. There will be many other factors that affect the final distribution of local anesthetics in the clinical setting. These factors include the cylindrical dimension and presence of the cord and nerve roots, pressure changes transmitted by the circulation, respiration and body movements, and also thermal and baricity differences of the injectate. Our zn uifvo observations, however, support findings of Horlocker et al. that with a fast injection rate there would be more lateral (cephaled and caudad) spread when the Whitacre needle orifice is point perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the cord. Also, it would suggest a more directional spread with slow injection rates if the needle orifice were pointed along the longitudinal axis. We are currently undertaking a clinical study to assess whether there is a difference between fast and slow injection rates through a 25-gauge Whitacre needle with the orifice pointing cephalad. Preliminary findings do in fact suggest that there is a higher cephalad spread with the slow rate.
[1]
J. Mark,et al.
Perioperative transesophageal echocardiography: the anesthesiologist as cardiac diagnostician.
,
1995,
Anesthesia and analgesia.
[2]
G. Sissons,et al.
Accidental subdural catheterization: radiological evidence of a possible mechanism for spinal cord damage.
,
1992,
British journal of anaesthesia.
[3]
F. Cigarroa,et al.
A retained esophageal stethoscope as a potential cause of small bowel obstruction.
,
1992,
Anesthesia and analgesia.
[4]
P. Bromage,et al.
A loss-of-resistance-to-negative-pressure technique for subarachnoid puncture with narrow gauge needles
,
1992,
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.
[5]
B. Ross,et al.
Local Anesthetic Distribution in a Spinal Model: A Possible Mechanism of Neurologic Injury after Continuous Spinal Anesthesia
,
1991,
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.
[6]
S. Bacharach.
Cardiac Imaging: A Companion to Braunwaldʼs Heart Disease
,
1991
.
[7]
K. Drasner,et al.
Cauda Equina Syndrome After Continuous Spinal Anesthesia
,
1991,
Anesthesia and analgesia.
[8]
T. H. Newton,et al.
Inadvertent extra-arachnoid injections in myelography.
,
1963,
Radiology.
[9]
B. Brogdon,et al.
The problem of subdural placement in myelography.
,
1962,
Radiology.