Buckling-Restrained-Lug Connection for Energy Dissipation

Under extreme loading conditions such as an earthquake event considerable amount of energy is imparted to a structure. To protect the structure and to minimize damages, a method is to divert a portion of the input energy into designated energy dissipating devices. A new energy dissipation device is presented in this paper. The device is referred to as Buckling-Restrained-Lug (BRL) which can be incorporated in structural joints. The device is composed of a short segment of a steel strut embedded inside a mortar filled jacket which makes the BRL's capacity governed by the squash load under axial tension or compression. The BRL dissipates energy through axial yielding of the steel strut. Analytical, finite element modeling and experimental results of the proposed BRL are presented and compared. Implementation of the BRL in a beam-to-column connection that results in a dissipative partial-moment-resisting joint is proposed. Based on the obtained results, the paper advocates the consideration of the BRL as a viable, compact and low-cost passive energy dissipation device.

[1]  Mehdi Ghassemieh,et al.  Energy dissipation characteristics of semi-rigid connections , 2009 .

[2]  Mahmud Ashraf,et al.  Theoretical evaluation of yielding shear panel device for passive energy dissipation , 2009 .

[3]  Keh‐Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Design of Steel Triangular Plate Energy Absorbers for Seismic-Resistant Construction , 1993 .

[4]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Seismic demands on steel braced frame buildings with buckling-restrained braces , 2003 .

[5]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Supplemental energy dissipation: state-of-the-art and state-of-the- practice , 2002 .

[6]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Seismic Response and Performance of Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames , 2007 .

[7]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Component Testing, Seismic Evaluation and Characterization of Buckling-Restrained Braces , 2004 .

[8]  Toru Takeuchi,et al.  LOCAL BUCKLING RESTRAINT CONDITION FOR CORE PLATES IN BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACES , 2010 .

[9]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of a Large-Scale Buckling-Restrained Braced Frame , 2007 .

[10]  San Francisco,et al.  Design Procedures for Buildings Incorporating Hysteretic Damping Devices , 2000 .

[11]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Subassemblage tests and finite element analyses of sandwiched buckling-restrained braces , 2010 .

[12]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  Energy dissipation systems for seismic applications: Current practice and recent developments , 2008 .

[13]  Chia-Ming Uang,et al.  Cyclic Testing of Steel Moment Connections Rehabilitated with RBS or Welded Haunch , 2000 .

[14]  Faris Albermani,et al.  Experimental study of steel slit damper for passive energy dissipation , 2008 .

[15]  Federico M. Mazzolani,et al.  Theory and Design of Seismic Resistant Steel Frames , 1996 .

[16]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Pseudo‐dynamic tests of a full‐scale CFT/BRB frame—Part I: Specimen design, experiment and analysis , 2008 .

[17]  Yi Min Xie,et al.  Shape optimization of metallic yielding devices for passive mitigation of seismic energy , 2010 .