The Relation of Self-Determination and Achievement Goals to Taiwanese Eighth Graders' Behavioral and Emotional Engagement in Schoolwork

In this study I examined how Taiwanese junior high school students' perceptions of autonomy support were related to their motivational characteristics, and the ability of these constructs to explain students' academic engagement. A total of 343 eighth-grade students completed a self-report survey assessing their perceptions of autonomy support from teachers, achievement goal orientations, self-regulatory styles, and behavioral as well as emotional engagement in schoolwork. Results supported the contention of self-determination theory (SDT) that, when students learn out of personal interest and personal relevance, they are more fully engaged in schoolwork, both behaviorally and emotionally. Moreover, students who perceived higher levels of autonomy support provided by teachers also reported more adaptive patterns of learning. In terms of effects of achievement goals, results suggested that, when constructs from SDT were accounted for, mastery-approach and performance-avoidance goals remained important for explaining Taiwanese students' academic functioning. This study also documented profiles of behaviorally engaged students with different levels of emotional engagement. Findings showed that behaviorally engaged students with higher levels of emotional engagement reported higher perceptions of autonomy support from teachers, identified regulation, intrinsic motivation, and mastery-approach goal orientation than did behaviorally engaged students with lower levels of emotional engagement. Implications for education and future research are discussed.

[1]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[2]  R. Vallerand,et al.  Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: toward a motivational model of high school dropout. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  M. Lepper,et al.  Rethinking the value of choice: a cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  A. Panter,et al.  Writing about structural equation models. , 1995 .

[5]  J. Abe,et al.  Psychological maladjustment among Asian and White American college students: Controlling for confounds. , 1990 .

[6]  Shinobu Kitayama,et al.  Culture and basic psychological principles , 1996 .

[7]  Michael A. Becker.  Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles , 1998 .

[8]  R. Ryan,et al.  Parent Styles Associated with Children's Self-Regulation and Competence in School. , 1989 .

[9]  R. Ryan,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Origins and Pawns in the Classroom: Self-Report and Projective Assessments of Individual Differences in Children's Perceptions , 1986 .

[10]  Kennon M. Sheldon,et al.  The Independent Effects of Goal Contents and Motives on Well-Being: It’s Both What You Pursue and Why You Pursue It , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[11]  E. Deci,et al.  Handbook of Self-Determination Research , 2002 .

[12]  E. Kelly.  Individualism and collectivism , 1901 .

[13]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[14]  Kennon M. Sheldon,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Avoidance (Relative to Approach) Personal Goals , 2001, Psychological science.

[15]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[16]  M. Vansteenkiste,et al.  Antecedents and Outcomes of Self-Determination in 3 Life Domains: The Role of Parents' and Teachers' Autonomy Support , 2005 .

[17]  E. Deci,et al.  The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective , 2000 .

[18]  R. Ryan,et al.  Autonomy in children's learning: an experimental and individual difference investigation. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Andrew J. Elliot,et al.  Achievement goals as predictors of achievement-relevant processes prior to task engagement. , 2002 .

[20]  Myron H. Dembo,et al.  Differences in the Motivational Beliefs of Asian American and Non-Asian Students. , 1997 .

[21]  A. Elliot,et al.  A 2 X 2 achievement goal framework. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  A. Elliot.  Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals , 1999 .

[23]  E. Deci,et al.  The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior , 2000 .

[24]  L. Pelletier,et al.  Latent Motivational Change in an Academic Setting: A 3-Year Longitudinal Study , 2005 .

[25]  Mar ianne Mise,et al.  Children Who Do Well in School : Individual Differences in Perceived Competence and Autonomy in Above-Average Children , 2001 .

[26]  P. Pintrich,et al.  An Achievement Goal Theory Perspective on Issues in Motivation Terminology, Theory, and Research. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[27]  Hans De Witte,et al.  The 'why' and 'why not' of job search behaviour: Their relation to searching, unemployment experience, and well-being , 2004 .

[28]  E. Skaalvik.  Self-enhancing and self-defeating ego orientation: Relations with task and avoidance orientation, achievement, self-perceptions, and anxiety. , 1997 .

[29]  Frank J. Bernieri,et al.  Setting limits on children's behavior: The differential effects of controlling vs. informational styles on intrinsic motivation and creativity , 1984 .

[30]  Joan G. Miller.  Bridging the content-structure dichotomy: Culture and the self. , 1988 .

[31]  Andrew J. Elliot,et al.  Perceptions of Classroom Environment, Achievement Goals, and Achievement Outcomes. , 2001 .

[32]  C. Wolters.  Advancing Achievement Goal Theory: Using Goal Structures and Goal Orientations to Predict Students' Motivation, Cognition, and Achievement. , 2004 .

[33]  A. Elliot,et al.  Achievement Goals and the Hierarchical Model of Achievement Motivation , 2001 .

[34]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  When rewards compete with nature: The undermining of intrinsic motivation and Self-Regulation , 2000 .

[35]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Goal Contents in Self-Determination Theory: Another Look at the Quality of Academic Motivation , 2006 .

[36]  Carole A. Ames.  Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. , 1992 .

[37]  E. Deci,et al.  Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: a test of self-determination theory. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  R. Ryan,et al.  Perceived locus of causality and internalization: examining reasons for acting in two domains. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  Hsiao H. d'Ailly.  Children's Autonomy and Perceived Control in Learning: A Model of Motivation and Achievement in Taiwan. , 2003 .

[40]  Shelly L. Gable,et al.  Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: A mediational analysis. , 1999 .

[41]  A. Elliot,et al.  A HIERARCHICAL MODEL OF APPROACH AND AVOIDANCE ACHIEVEMENT MOTIVATION , 1997 .

[42]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[43]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[44]  C. Sansone,et al.  Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation : the search for optimal motivation and performance , 2000 .

[45]  P. Alexander,et al.  A Motivated Exploration of Motivation Terminology. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[46]  R. Vallerand,et al.  Academic Motivation and School Performance: Toward a Structural Model , 1995 .

[47]  R. Hambleton.  Guidelines for adapting educational and psychological tests: A progress report. , 1994 .

[48]  C. Dweck,et al.  A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality , 1988 .

[49]  Tim Urdan,et al.  Changes in the perceived classroom goal structure and pattern of adaptive learning during early adolescence , 2003 .

[50]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[51]  Kennon M. Sheldon,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Motivating Learning, Performance, and Persistence: The Synergistic Effects of Intrinsic Goal Contents and Autonomy-Supportive Contexts , 2004 .

[52]  R. Koestner,et al.  Distinguishing three ways of being highly motivated: A closer look at introjection, identification, and intrinsic motivation. , 2002 .

[53]  Marianne Miserandino,et al.  Children Who Do Well in School: Individual Differences in Perceived Competence and Autonomy in Above-Average Children , 1996 .

[54]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  An Instrument to Assess Adults' Orientations toward Control versus Autonomy with Children: Reflections on Intrinsic Motivation and Perceived Competence. , 1981 .

[55]  Michael J. Middleton,et al.  Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory. , 1997 .

[56]  Richard M. Ryan,et al.  Autonomy and Competence in German and American University Students: A Comparative Study Based on Self-Determination Theory. , 2004 .

[57]  E. Deci,et al.  Facilitating internalization: the self-determination theory perspective. , 1994, Journal of personality.

[58]  Michael J. Middleton,et al.  Achievement goals and goal structures. , 2002 .

[59]  H. Markus,et al.  Models of agency: sociocultural diversity in the construction of action. , 2003, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[60]  Mingming Zhou,et al.  Experiences of Autonomy and Control Among Chinese Learners: Vitalizing or Immobilizing?. , 2005 .

[61]  Robert J. Vallerand,et al.  Associations Among Perceived Autonomy Support, Forms of Self-Regulation, and Persistence: A Prospective Study , 2001 .

[62]  Michael Harris Bond,et al.  The Psychology of the Chinese people , 1986 .

[63]  Kuo-shu Yang.  Social Orientation and Individual Modernity among Chinese Students in Taiwan , 1981 .