An Empirical Explanation of the Chubb Illusion

The perceived difference in brightness between elements of a patterned target is diminished when the target is embedded in a similar surround of higher luminance contrast (the Chubb illusion). Here we show that this puzzling effect can be explained by the degree to which imperfect transmittance is likely to have affected the light that reaches the eye. These observations indicate that this illusion is yet another signature of the fundamentally empirical strategy of visual perception, in this case generated by the typical influence of transmittance on inherently ambiguous stimuli.

[1]  D Purves,et al.  An Empirical Explanation of the Cornsweet Effect , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  B. Anderson.  A Theory of Illusory Lightness and Transparency in Monocular and Binocular Images: The Role of Contour Junctions , 1997, Perception.

[3]  F. Metelli,et al.  Balanced and unbalanced, complete and partial transparency , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  D. Purves,et al.  Mach bands as empirically derived associations. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  F. Metelli.  An algebraic development of the theory of perceptual transparency. , 1970, Ergonomics.

[6]  D. Purves,et al.  An empirical explanation of color contrast. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Lynn A Olzak,et al.  Multiple gain control processes in contrast–contrast phenomena , 1999, Vision Research.

[8]  S. Palmer.  Vision Science : Photons to Phenomenology , 1999 .

[9]  D Purves,et al.  Why we see things the way we do: evidence for a wholly empirical strategy of vision. , 2001, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[10]  D Purves,et al.  An empirical explanation of brightness. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  D. Purves,et al.  The influence of depicted illumination on brightness. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  D Purves,et al.  An empirical basis for Mach bands. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  M. Nicholls,et al.  Free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for the judgement of brightness, numerosity and size , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  J A Solomon,et al.  Texture interactions determine perceived contrast , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  D. Purves,et al.  The effects of color on brightness , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.