This paper evaluates whether SFR metallic nuclear fuel can be economical. To make this determination, the cost of SFCF (SFR fuel cycle facilities) was estimated, and the break-even point of the manufacturing cost of SFR metallic nuclear fuel for direct disposal option was then calculated. As a result of the cost estimation, the levelized unit cost (LUC) for SFCF was calculated to be 5,311 $/kgHM, and the break-even point was calculated to be $5,267/kgHM. Therefore, the cost difference between LUC and the break-even point is not only small but is also within the relevant range of the uncertainty level of Class 3 in accordance with a generic cost estimate classification matrix of AACE (the Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering). This means it is very difficult to judge the economical feasibility of SFR metallic nuclear fuel because as of today there are no commercial facilities in Korea or the world. The economic feasibility of SFR metallic nuclear fuel, however, will be enhanced if the mass production of SFCF becomes possible in the future.
[1]
David Shropshire,et al.
Advanced Fuel Cycle Cost Basis
,
2007
.
[2]
P. M. S. Jones,et al.
The economics of the nuclear fuel cycle
,
1989
.
[3]
Robert Hill,et al.
The design rationale of the IFR
,
1997
.
[4]
C. E. Boardman,et al.
The separations technology and transmutation systems (STATS) report — Implications for nuclear power growth and energy sufficiency
,
1998
.
[5]
Omori Takashi,et al.
Development of hybrid reprocessing technology based on solvent extraction and pyro-chemical electrolysis
,
2011
.
[6]
M. Yamano,et al.
ECONOMICS OF THE NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE.
,
1968
.
[7]
J. J. Laidler,et al.
Chemical partitioning technologies for an ATW system
,
2001
.
[8]
C. E. Till,et al.
The intergral fast reactor-an overview
,
1997
.
[9]
Won Il Ko,et al.
Cost-benefit analysis of BeO-UO2 nuclear fuel
,
2010
.