Monte Carlo simulation for uncertainty estimation on structural data in implicit 3-D geological modeling, a guide for disturbance distribution selection and parameterization

Abstract. Three-dimensional (3-D) geological structural modeling aims to determine geological information in a 3-D space using structural data (foliations and interfaces) and topological rules as inputs. This is necessary in any project in which the properties of the subsurface matters; they express our understanding of geometries in depth. For that reason, 3-D geological models have a wide range of practical applications including but not restricted to civil engineering, the oil and gas industry, the mining industry, and water management. These models, however, are fraught with uncertainties originating from the inherent flaws of the modeling engines (working hypotheses, interpolator's parameterization) and the inherent lack of knowledge in areas where there are no observations combined with input uncertainty (observational, conceptual and technical errors). Because 3-D geological models are often used for impactful decision-making it is critical that all 3-D geological models provide accurate estimates of uncertainty. This paper's focus is set on the effect of structural input data measurement uncertainty propagation in implicit 3-D geological modeling. This aim is achieved using Monte Carlo simulation for uncertainty estimation (MCUE), a stochastic method which samples from predefined disturbance probability distributions that represent the uncertainty of the original input data set. MCUE is used to produce hundreds to thousands of altered unique data sets. The altered data sets are used as inputs to produce a range of plausible 3-D models. The plausible models are then combined into a single probabilistic model as a means to propagate uncertainty from the input data to the final model. In this paper, several improved methods for MCUE are proposed. The methods pertain to distribution selection for input uncertainty, sample analysis and statistical consistency of the sampled distribution. Pole vector sampling is proposed as a more rigorous alternative than dip vector sampling for planar features and the use of a Bayesian approach to disturbance distribution parameterization is suggested. The influence of incorrect disturbance distributions is discussed and propositions are made and evaluated on synthetic and realistic cases to address the sighted issues. The distribution of the errors of the observed data (i.e., scedasticity) is shown to affect the quality of prior distributions for MCUE. Results demonstrate that the proposed workflows improve the reliability of uncertainty estimation and diminish the occurrence of artifacts.

[1]  Suvrit Sra,et al.  A short note on parameter approximation for von Mises-Fisher distributions: and a fast implementation of Is(x) , 2012, Comput. Stat..

[2]  J. Florian Wellmann,et al.  pynoddy 1.0: an experimental platform for automated 3-D kinematic and potential field modelling , 2015 .

[3]  R. Nelson,et al.  Oriented Core: Its Use, Error, and Uncertainty , 1987 .

[4]  William H. McAnally,et al.  Estimation and Propagation of Parameter Uncertainty in Lumped Hydrological Models: A Case Study of HSPF Model Applied to Luxapallila Creek Watershed in Southeast USA , 2013 .

[5]  Christophe Aug,et al.  Modélisation géologique 3D et caractérisation des incertitudes par la méthode du champ de potentiel. (3D geological modelling and uncertainty: the potential-field method) , 2004 .

[6]  Richard W. Allmendinger,et al.  Structural data collection with mobile devices: Accuracy, redundancy, and best practices , 2017 .

[7]  Kanti V. Mardia,et al.  Bayesian inference for the von Mises-Fisher distribution , 1976 .

[8]  J. Chilès,et al.  3D Geological Modelling and Uncertainty: The Potential-field Method , 2005 .

[9]  J. Florian Wellmann,et al.  Information Theory for Correlation Analysis and Estimation of Uncertainty Reduction in Maps and Models , 2013, Entropy.

[10]  H. Omre Bayesian kriging—Merging observations and qualified guesses in kriging , 1987 .

[11]  M. Jessell,et al.  Towards an integrated inversion of geoscientific data: What price of geology? , 2010 .

[12]  C. Lajaunie,et al.  Comparing some approximate methods for building local confidence intervals for predicting regionalized variables , 1990 .

[13]  M. Jessell,et al.  Locating and quantifying geological uncertainty in three-dimensional models: Analysis of the Gippsland Basin, southeastern Australia , 2012 .

[14]  Hui Wang,et al.  A Segmentation Approach for Stochastic Geological Modeling Using Hidden Markov Random Fields , 2017, Mathematical Geosciences.

[15]  F. Horowitz,et al.  Towards incorporating uncertainty of structural data in 3D geological inversion , 2010 .

[16]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[17]  J. Chilès,et al.  Geostatistics: Modeling Spatial Uncertainty , 1999 .

[18]  Peter R. Leyshon,et al.  Stereographic Projection Techniques for Geologists and Civil Engineers: Acknowledgements , 2004 .

[19]  Lucie Nováková,et al.  Assessment of the precision of smart phones and tablets for measurement of planar orientations: A case study , 2017 .

[20]  Lincoln Paterson,et al.  Engineering Aspects of Geological Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide , 2002 .

[21]  G. D. Hammond,et al.  Measurement of the Earth tides with a MEMS gravimeter , 2016, Nature.

[22]  Mehrdad Bastani,et al.  Joint inversion of gravity, magnetic, and petrophysical data - A case study from a gabbro intrusion in Boden, Sweden , 2015 .

[23]  Zhong Jin,et al.  Heteroscedastic Sparse Representation Based Classification for Face Recognition , 2012, Neural Processing Letters.

[24]  David Entwisle,et al.  Benefits of a 3D geological model for major tunnelling works: an example from Farringdon, east–central London, UK , 2012 .

[25]  Kerry Key,et al.  Broad-band waveforms and robust processing for marine CSEM surveys , 2011 .

[26]  Graham Heinson,et al.  Insights into lithospheric architecture, fertilisation and fluid pathways from AusLAMP MT , 2016 .

[27]  L. Ailleres,et al.  Method and analysis for the upscaling of structural data , 2016 .

[28]  J. Chilès,et al.  Modelling the geometry of geological units and its uncertainty in 3D from structural data: The potential-field method , 2007 .

[29]  J. Wellmann,et al.  Structural geologic modeling as an inference problem: A Bayesian perspective , 2016 .

[30]  R. L. Eubank,et al.  Detecting Heteroscedasticity in Nonparametric Regression , 1993 .

[31]  E. Ziegel Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology (3rd ed.) , 2005 .

[32]  John Skilling,et al.  Data Analysis-A Bayesian Tutorial: Second Edition , 2006 .

[33]  Stuart J. Cormack,et al.  The validity and reliability of GPS units for measuring distance in team sport specific running patterns. , 2010, International journal of sports physiology and performance.

[34]  Nicholas I. Fisher,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Spherical Data. , 1987 .

[35]  Rene A. Camacho,et al.  A Comparison of Bayesian Methods for Uncertainty Analysis in Hydraulic and Hydrodynamic Modeling , 2015 .

[36]  R. J. Moffat,et al.  Contributions to the Theory of Single-Sample Uncertainty Analysis , 1982 .

[37]  R. Lark,et al.  A statistical assessment of the uncertainty in a 3-D geological framework model , 2013 .

[38]  V. Lapenna,et al.  Electrical resistivity tomography technique for landslide investigation: A review , 2014 .

[39]  Jean-Paul Chilès,et al.  Delineate 3D Iron Ore Geology and Resource Models using the Potential Field Method , 2009 .

[40]  A. N. Kolmogorov,et al.  Foundations of the theory of probability , 1960 .

[41]  P. Gupta,et al.  Electrical resistivity cross-section across the Garhwal Himalaya: Proxy to fluid-seismicity linkage , 2014 .

[42]  Josemar Rodrigues,et al.  Theory & Methods: An Empirical Bayes Inference for the von Mises Distribution , 2000 .

[43]  Mats O. Karlsson,et al.  A strategy for residual error modeling incorporating scedasticity of variance and distribution shape , 2015, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.

[44]  J. Florian Wellmann,et al.  Validating 3-D structural models with geological knowledge for improved uncertainty evaluations , 2014 .

[45]  Jean Besse,et al.  Comparisons from multiple realizations of a geological model. Implication for uncertainty factors identification , 2015 .

[46]  A. Guilléna,et al.  Geological modelling from field data and geological knowledge Part II . Modelling validation using gravity and magnetic data inversion , 2008 .

[47]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  On conjugate families and Jeffreys priors for von Mises–Fisher distributions , 2013, Journal of statistical planning and inference.

[48]  Inga Moeck,et al.  Catalog of geothermal play types based on geologic controls , 2014 .

[49]  John Quirein,et al.  Use of Multi-Attribute Transforms to Predict Log Properties from Seismic Data , 2000 .

[50]  J. Wellmann,et al.  Uncertainties have a meaning: Information entropy as a quality measure for 3-D geological models , 2012 .

[51]  Roland Martin,et al.  Next Generation Three-Dimensional Geologic Modeling and Inversion , 2014 .

[52]  Stefan Finsterle,et al.  Integrating structural geological data into the inverse modelling framework of iTOUGH2 , 2014, Comput. Geosci..

[53]  F. C. Phillips,et al.  The Use of Stereographic Projection in Structural Geology , 1960 .

[54]  Peter R. Leyshon,et al.  Stereographic Projection Techniques for Geologists and Civil Engineers: Stereographic Projection Techniques for Geologists and Civil Engineers , 2004 .

[55]  M. Jessell,et al.  Making the link between geological and geophysical uncertainty: geodiversity in the Ashanti Greenstone Belt , 2013 .

[56]  Martin Stigsson Orientation Uncertainty of Structures Measured in Cored Boreholes: Methodology and Case Study of Swedish Crystalline Rock , 2016, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[57]  P. Ledru,et al.  Geological modelling from field data and geological knowledge. Part II. Modelling validation using gravity and magnetic data inversion , 2008 .

[58]  M. Clark,et al.  A philosophical basis for hydrological uncertainty , 2016 .

[59]  János Fodor,et al.  Traditional and New Ways to Handle Uncertainty in Geology , 2001 .

[60]  Irwin Guttman,et al.  Theoretical considerations of the multivariate von Mises-Fisher distribution , 1988 .

[61]  A. Wood Simulation of the von mises fisher distribution , 1994 .

[62]  J. Cruz,et al.  Using stable isotopes to characterize groundwater recharge sources in the volcanic island of Madeira, Portugal , 2016 .

[63]  Hans Levenbach,et al.  The Estimation of Heteroscedasticity from a Marginal Likelihood Function , 1973 .

[64]  A. E. Annels,et al.  Errors and Uncertainty in Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve Estimation: The Importance of Getting it Right , 2002 .

[65]  Jürgen Pilz,et al.  Why do we need and how should we implement Bayesian kriging methods , 2008 .

[66]  Gabriele Freni,et al.  Bayesian approach for uncertainty quantification in water quality modelling: The influence of prior distribution , 2010 .

[67]  Thomas Hamelryck,et al.  Using the Fisher-Bingham distribution in stochastic models for protein structure , 2022 .

[68]  C. Read,et al.  Handbook of the normal distribution , 1982 .

[69]  Anand K Bewoor,et al.  Metrology and measurement , 2009 .

[70]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[71]  Michael Maxelon,et al.  Three-dimensional geometry and tectonostratigraphy of the Pennine zone, Central Alps, Switzerland and Northern Italy , 2005 .

[72]  Robert E. Wallace,et al.  Geometry of Shearing Stress and Relation to Faulting , 1951, The Journal of Geology.

[73]  Ola Eiken,et al.  A proven method for acquiring highly repeatable towed streamer seismic data , 2003 .

[74]  Holger Kessler,et al.  Interpretative modelling of a geological cross section from boreholes: sources of uncertainty and their quantification , 2014 .

[75]  Salvatore Martino,et al.  Unconventional pseudostatic stability analysis of the Diezma landslide (Granada, Spain) based on a high-resolution engineering-geological model , 2015 .

[76]  Philip Ringrose,et al.  Identifying the Representative Elementary Volume for Permeability in Heterolithic Deposits Using Numerical Rock Models , 2008 .

[77]  J. Chilès,et al.  Geological modelling from field data and geological knowledge. Part I. Modelling method coupling 3D potential-field interpolation and geological rules , 2008 .

[78]  Holger Cremer,et al.  A staged geogenetic approach to underwater archaeological prospection in the Port of Rotterdam (Yangtzehaven, Maasvlakte, The Netherlands): A geological and palaeoenvironmental case study for local mapping of Mesolithic lowland landscapes , 2015 .

[79]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[80]  R. Reyment,et al.  Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology. , 1988 .

[81]  E. B. Wilson First and Second Laws of Error , 1923 .

[82]  Inderjit S. Dhillon,et al.  Clustering on the Unit Hypersphere using von Mises-Fisher Distributions , 2005, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[83]  C. Lajaunie,et al.  Foliation fields and 3D cartography in geology: Principles of a method based on potential interpolation , 1997 .

[84]  C. Bond,et al.  LiDAR, UAV or compass-clinometer? Accuracy, coverage and the effects on structural models , 2017 .

[85]  R. Cammack Developing an engineering geological model in the fractured and brecciated rocks of a copper porphyry deposit , 2016, Engineering Geology Special Publication.

[86]  H. Wold,et al.  Limit Distributions for Sums of Independent Variables , 1955 .

[87]  E. Kragh,et al.  Seismic repeatability, normalized rms, and predictability , 2002 .

[88]  Satoshi Morita,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of Prior Assumptions in Bayesian Biostatistics , 2010, Statistics in biosciences.

[89]  Robert J. Moffat,et al.  Describing the Uncertainties in Experimental Results , 1988 .