Semi-automatic lymphoma detection and segmentation using fully conditional random fields

The detection and delineation of the lymphoma volume are a critical step for its treatment and its outcome prediction. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is widely used for lymphoma detection. Two common types of approaches can be distinguished for lymphoma detection and segmentation in PET. The first one is ROI dependent which needs a ROI defined by physicians. The second one is based on machine learning methods which need a large learning database. However, such a large standard database is quite rare in medical field. Considering these problems, we propose a new approach that combines PET (metabolic information) with CT (anatomical information). Our approach is semi-automatic, it consists of three steps. First, an anatomical multi-atlas segmentation is applied on CT to locate and remove the organs having physiologic hypermetabolism in PET. Then, CRFs (Conditional Random Fields) detect and segment a set of possible lymphoma volumes in PET. The conditional probabilities used in CRFs are usually estimated by a learning step. In this work, we propose to estimate them in an unsupervised way. The final step is to visualize the detected lymphoma volumes and select the real ones by simply clicking on them. The false detection is low thanks to the first step. Our method is tested on 11 patients. The rate of good detection of lymphoma is 100%. The average of Dice indexes for measuring the lymphoma segmentation performance is 84.4% compared to the manual lymphoma segmentation. Comparing with other methods in terms of Dice index shows the best performance of our method.

[1]  Vladlen Koltun,et al.  Efficient Inference in Fully Connected CRFs with Gaussian Edge Potentials , 2011, NIPS.

[2]  C. Rübe,et al.  Comparison of different methods for delineation of 18F-FDG PET-positive tissue for target volume definition in radiotherapy of patients with non-Small cell lung cancer. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  Fen Chen,et al.  Classification of Lymphoma Cell Image Based on Improved SVM , 2015 .

[4]  Sally F Barrington,et al.  FDG PET for therapy monitoring in Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas , 2017, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[5]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  PET-guided delineation of radiation therapy treatment volumes: a survey of image segmentation techniques , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[6]  Marie-Pierre Jolly,et al.  Interactive graph cuts for optimal boundary & region segmentation of objects in N-D images , 2001, Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ICCV 2001.

[7]  Bennett A Landman,et al.  Efficient multi-atlas abdominal segmentation on clinically acquired CT with SIMPLE context learning , 2015, Medical Image Anal..

[8]  Antonio Criminisi,et al.  TextonBoost for Image Understanding: Multi-Class Object Recognition and Segmentation by Jointly Modeling Texture, Layout, and Context , 2007, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[9]  Lingfeng Wen,et al.  Automatic detection and classification of regions of FDG uptake in whole-body PET-CT lymphoma studies , 2017, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[10]  Federica Fioroni,et al.  Metabolic tumour volumes measured at staging in lymphoma: methodological evaluation on phantom experiments and patients , 2014, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[11]  Michel Meignan,et al.  Report on the First International Workshop on interim-PET scan in lymphoma , 2009, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[12]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  A Comparative Study of Energy Minimization Methods for Markov Random Fields with Smoothness-Based Priors , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[13]  Pierre Vera,et al.  Molecular Profile and FDG-PET/CT Total Metabolic Tumor Volume Improve Risk Classification at Diagnosis for Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma , 2015, Clinical Cancer Research.

[14]  P Vera,et al.  Development of a generic thresholding algorithm for the delineation of 18FDG-PET-positive tissue: application to the comparison of three thresholding models , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Abbes Amira,et al.  3D Oncological PET volume analysis using CNN and LVQNN , 2010, Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[16]  Ora Israel,et al.  18F-FDG Avidity in Lymphoma Readdressed: A Study of 766 Patients , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  Vladlen Koltun,et al.  Parameter Learning and Convergent Inference for Dense Random Fields , 2013, ICML.

[18]  I. Buvat,et al.  Comparative Assessment of Methods for Estimating Tumor Volume and Standardized Uptake Value in 18F-FDG PET , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  Di Yan,et al.  Defining a radiotherapy target with positron emission tomography. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  Su Ruan,et al.  3D automated lymphoma segmentation in PET images based on cellular automata , 2014, 2014 4th International Conference on Image Processing Theory, Tools and Applications (IPTA).

[21]  L. Adler,et al.  Simultaneous recovery of size and radioactivity concentration of small spheroids with PET data. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  Hugues Talbot,et al.  Automated 3D lymphoma lesion segmentation from PET/CT characteristics , 2017, 2017 IEEE 14th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2017).