Diffraction imaging by focusing‐defocusing: An outlook on seismic superresolution

Diffractions always need more advertising. It is true that conventional seismic processing and migration are usually successful in using specular reflections to estimate subsurface velocities and reconstruct the geometry and strength of continuous and pronounced reflectors. However, correct identification of geological discontinuities, such as faults, pinch-outs, and small-size scattering objects, is one of the main objectives of seismic interpretation. The seismic response from these structural elements is encoded in diffractions, and diffractions are essentially lost during the conventional processing/migration sequence. Hence, we advocate a diffraction-based, data-oriented approach to enhance image resolution—as opposed to the traditional image-oriented techniques, which operate on the image after processing and migration. Even more: it can be shown that, at least in principle, processing of diffractions can lead to superresolution and the recovery of details smaller than the seismic wavelength. The so-called reflection stack is capable of effectively separating diffracted and reflected energy on a prestack shot gather by focusing the reflection to a point while the diffraction remains unfocused over a large area. Muting the reflection focus and defocusing the residual wavefield result in a shot gather that contains mostly diffractions. Diffraction imaging applies the classical (isotropic) diffraction stack to these diffraction shot gathers. This focusingmuting-defocusing approach can successfully image faults, small-size scattering objects, and diffracting edges. It can be implemented both in model-independent and modeldependent contexts. The resulting diffraction images can greatly assist the interpreter when used as a standard supplement to full-wave images.

[1]  Theodor Krey THE SIGNIFICANCE OF DIFFRACTION IN THE INVESTIGATION OF FAULTS , 1952 .

[2]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  A process of seismic reflection interpretation , 1954 .

[3]  E. H. Linfoot Principles of Optics , 1961 .

[4]  J. Keller,et al.  Geometrical theory of diffraction. , 1962, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[5]  A. W. Trorey A SIMPLE THEORY FOR SEISMIC DIFFRACTIONS , 1970 .

[6]  R. Gerchberg Super-resolution through Error Energy Reduction , 1974 .

[7]  John R. Berryhill,et al.  DIFFRACTION RESPONSE FOR NONZERO SEPARATION OF SOURCE AND RECEIVER , 1977 .

[8]  Gregory Beylkin,et al.  Imaging of discontinuities in the inverse scattering problem by inversion of a causal generalized Radon transform , 1985 .

[9]  Eric de Bazelaire,et al.  Normal Moveout Revisited: Inhomogeneous Media And Curved Interfaces , 1986 .

[10]  B. Gelchinsky,et al.  A METHOD FOR DETECTION OF DIFFRACTED WAVES ON COMMON‐OFFSET SECTIONS* , 1987 .

[11]  Suhas Phadke,et al.  Imaging discontinuities on seismic sections , 1988 .

[12]  Paul Docherty,et al.  A brief comparison of some Kirchhoff integral formulas for migration and inversion , 1991 .

[13]  Larry Lines,et al.  Theory of seismic diffractions , 1994 .

[14]  Theory of seismic diffractions. Open File Publications No.1 , 1994 .

[15]  P. Hubral,et al.  A unified approach to 3-D seismic reflection imaging; Part II, Theory , 1996 .

[16]  Martin Tygel,et al.  A unified approach to 3-D seismic reflection imaging, Part I: Basic concepts , 1996 .

[17]  Mario Bertero,et al.  Resolution and super-resolution in inverse diffraction , 1997 .

[18]  N. Neidell Perceptions in seismic imaging Part 2: Reflective and diffractive contributions to seismic imaging , 1997 .

[19]  K. Nick,et al.  Automatic detection of hyperbolas in georadargrams by slant-stack processing and migration , 1998 .

[20]  E. Landa,et al.  Seismic monitoring of diffraction images for detection of local heterogeneities , 1998 .

[21]  Resolution in seismic imaging: Is it all a matter of perspective? , 1998 .

[22]  Evgeny Landa,et al.  Multiple attenuation in the parabolic τ-p domain using wavefront characteristics of multiple generating primaries , 1999 .

[23]  Kurt J. Marfurt,et al.  Eigenstructure-based coherence computations as an aid to 3-D structural and stratigraphic mapping , 1999 .

[24]  Gerard T. Schuster,et al.  Resolution limits of migrated images , 1999 .

[25]  Boris Gurevich,et al.  Application of multifocusing method for subsurface imaging , 1999 .

[26]  Separation of reflected and diffracted objects by means Gaussian beams decomposition , 2000 .

[27]  Lúcio T. Santos,et al.  Seismic modeling by demigration , 2000 .

[28]  B. Zavalishin Diffraction problems of 3D seismic imaging , 2000 .

[29]  Steen A. Petersen,et al.  Diffractivity analysis of VSP data , 2000 .

[30]  Gerard T. Schuster,et al.  Separation of signal and coherent noise by migration filtering , 2000 .

[31]  G. Schuster,et al.  Poststack migration deconvolutionPoststack Migration Deconvolution , 2001 .

[32]  G. Schuster,et al.  Prestack migration deconvolution , 2001 .

[33]  D. Stoughton,et al.  2D Elastic Model For Wavefield Investigations Of Subsalt Objectives, Deep Water Gulf Of Mexico , 2001 .

[34]  V. Červený,et al.  Seismic Ray Theory , 2001, Encyclopedia of Solid Earth Geophysics.

[35]  Gijs C. Fehmers,et al.  Fast structural interpretation with structure-oriented filtering , 2002 .

[36]  G. Fehmers,et al.  Fast structural interpretation with structure-oriented filteringStructure-Oriented Filtering , 2003 .