We propose a rule-based technique to generate redundancy-free NL descriptions of OWL entities.The existing approaches which address the problem of verbalizing OWL ontologies generate NL text segments which are close to their counterpart OWL statements.Some of these approaches also perform grouping and aggregating of these NL text segments to generate a more fluent and comprehensive form of the content.Restricting our attention to description of individuals and concepts, we find that the approach currently followed in the available tools is that of determining the set of all logical conditions that are satisfied by the given individual/concept name and translate these conditions verbatim into corresponding NL descriptions.Human-understandability of such descriptions is affected by the presence of repetitions and redundancies, as they have high fidelity to their OWL this http URL the literature, no efforts had been taken to remove redundancies and repetitions at the logical-level before generating the NL descriptions of entities and we find this to be the main reason for lack of readability of the generated text.Herein, we propose a technique called semantic-refinement(SR) to generate meaningful and easily-understandable descriptions of individuals and concepts of a given OWLontology.We identify the combinations of OWL/DL constructs that lead to repetitive/redundant descriptions and propose a series of refinement rules to rewrite the conditions that are satisfied by an individual/concept in a meaning-preserving manner.The reduced set of conditions are then employed for generating NL descriptions.Our experiments show that, SR leads to significantly improved descriptions of ontology entities.We also test the effectiveness and usefulness of the the generated descriptions for the purpose of validating the ontologies and find that the proposed technique is indeed helpful in the context.
[1]
Kaarel Kaljurand,et al.
ATTEMPTO CONTROLLED ENGLISH AS A SEMANTIC WEB LANGUAGE
,
2007
.
[2]
C. Maria Keet,et al.
Multilingual verbalization of ORM conceptual models and axiomatized ontologies
,
2014
.
[3]
Robert Stevens,et al.
Automating generation of textual class definitions from OWL to English
,
2011,
J. Biomed. Semant..
[4]
Ion Androutsopoulos,et al.
Generating Natural Language Descriptions from OWL Ontologies: the NaturalOWL System
,
2013,
J. Artif. Intell. Res..
[5]
C. Halaschek-Wiener,et al.
Effective NL Paraphrasing of Ontologies on the Semantic Web
,
2005
.
[6]
Diego Calvanese,et al.
The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications
,
2003,
Description Logic Handbook.
[7]
Richard Power,et al.
OWL to English: a tool for generating organised easily-navigated hypertexts from ontologies
,
2011
.
[8]
Ian Horrocks,et al.
Reasoning with Individuals for the Description Logic SHIQ
,
2000,
CADE.
[9]
Thomas Andreas Meyer,et al.
Sydney OWL Syntax - towards a Controlled Natural Language Syntax for OWL 1.1
,
2007,
OWLED.
[10]
Kaarel Kaljurand,et al.
Verbalizing OWL in Attempto Controlled English
,
2007,
OWLED.
[11]
Gert Smolka,et al.
Attributive Concept Descriptions with Complements
,
1991,
Artif. Intell..
[12]
Catherine Dolbear,et al.
Lege Feliciter: Using Structured English to represent a Topographic Hydrology Ontology
,
2007,
OWLED.