A Metacognitive Approach to Phonics

For poor readers, one roadblock to the construction of meaning from text may be the inability to decode words quickly and accurately. In most cases more phonics instruction, similar to what has not worked in the past, does not improve this situation. Based on an analysis of the research literature in decoding and linguistics and a 4-year cycle of program development, a new program was created for teaching decoding to poor readers of average or above intelligence in grades 1 through 8. The program guides students to become aware of patterns and consistencies in our language and to apply a decoding process of using what they have learned about words to decode words they do not know. It is a teacher directed, supplemental program to be taught to a whole class for approximately 15 to 20 minutes a day and is intended to be used in conjunction with a basal reader or trade book program. The program features a multisensory approach, strong emphasis on vocabulary and language development, and a direct teaching model. Goals of the program include teaching students to use known words to decode unknown words, to discriminate structural components of words, to see how our language is organized, to be flexible in pronouncing words, and to demonstrate automaticity in decoding---all as foundation blocks for the meaning-making process. Preliminary evidence suggests that the program has been successful in improving students' decoding skills.

[1]  M. T. Zivian,et al.  Performance on a word-likeness task by normal readers and reading-disabled children , 1986 .

[2]  J. B. Wyman,et al.  What is reading ability , 1921 .

[3]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  The Interactive-Compensatory Model of Reading , 1984 .

[4]  G. Marsh,et al.  Developmental Changes in Reading Strategies , 1977 .

[5]  E. Gibson,et al.  The Psychology of Reading , 1977 .

[6]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The role of familiar units in perception of words and nonwords , 1977 .

[7]  S. Jay Samuels,et al.  Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading , 1974 .

[8]  Patricia M. Cunningham.  Investigating a synthesized theory of mediated word identification , 1975 .

[9]  P. Bryant,et al.  Categorizing sounds and learning to read—a causal connection , 1983, Nature.

[10]  L. S. Schulman.  Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching , 1986 .

[11]  W. P. Erchul,et al.  The Wide Range Achievement Test—Revised: How Much Has It Been Improved? , 1987 .

[12]  C. Perfetti.  Continuities in Reading Acquisition, Reading Skill, and Reading Disability , 1986 .

[13]  K. Stanovich.  Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. , 1986 .

[14]  Jana M. Mason,et al.  Reading Instruction for Today , 1990 .

[15]  Richard C. Anderson.  Becoming a Nation of Readers: The Report of the Commission on Reading , 1985 .

[16]  Danielle R. Zinna,et al.  Children's Sensitivity to Factors Influencing Vowel Reading. , 1986 .

[17]  P. David Pearson.  Handbook of reading research. , 1990 .

[18]  F. Vellutino,et al.  Converging Perspectives in the Study of the Reading Process , 1984 .

[19]  D. Wolff.  Analogy Strategies for Improving Word Recognition in Competent and Learning Disabled Readers. , 1985 .

[20]  Robert J. Tierney,et al.  Research on Teaching Reading Comprehension. Technical Report No. 187. , 1980 .

[21]  Lila R. Gleitman,et al.  Orthographic Resources Affect Reading Acquisition—If They Are Used , 1985 .

[22]  J. Torgesen,et al.  Memory Processes in Reading Disabled Children , 1985, Journal of learning disabilities.

[23]  C. Fowler,et al.  Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[24]  I. Gaskins.  There's More to a Reading Problem than Poor Reading , 1984, Journal of learning disabilities.

[25]  R. Glushko.  The Organization and Activation of Orthographic Knowledge in Reading Aloud. , 1979 .

[26]  Philip B. Gough.  12 – Context, Form, and Interaction , 1983 .