Assignment of attribute weights with belief distributions for MADM under uncertainties

Abstract Multiple attribute decision making (MADM) problems often consist of various types of quantitative and qualitative attributes. Quantitative attributes can be assessed by accurate numerical values, interval values or fuzzy numbers, while qualitative attributes can be evaluated by belief distributions, linguistic variables or intuitionistic fuzzy sets. However, the determination of attribute weights is still an open issue in MADM problems until now. In the traditional objective weight assignment method, attributes are usually assessed by accurate values. In this paper, an entropy weight assignment method is proposed to dealing with the situation where the assessment of attributes can contain uncertainties, e.g., interval values, or contain both uncertainties and incompleteness, e.g., belief distributions. The advantage of the proposed method lies in that uncertainties and incompleteness contained in the interval numerical values or belief distributions can be preserved in the generated weights. Specifically, several pairs of programming models to generate the weights of attributes are constructed in three different circumstances: (1) quantitative attribute expressed by interval values; (2) incomplete belief distribution with accurate belief degrees; and (3) belief distribution constituted by interval belief degrees. The evidential reasoning approach is then utilized to aggregate the distributions of attributes based on the generated attribute weights. The normalized interval weight vector is defined, and the characteristics of the weight assignment method are discussed. The proposed method has been experimented with real data to illustrate its advantages and the potential in supporting MADM with uncertain and incomplete information.

[1]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty , 2002, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[2]  Changyong Liang,et al.  A trust propagation and collaborative filtering based method for incomplete information in social network group decision making with type-2 linguistic trust , 2019, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[3]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  A general evidential reasoning algorithm for multi-attribute decision analysis under interval uncertainty , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Evidential reasoning approach with multiple kinds of attributes and entropy-based weight assignment , 2019, Knowl. Based Syst..

[5]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Evidential reasoning rule for MADM with both weights and reliabilities in group decision making , 2017, Knowl. Based Syst..

[6]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  A three-stage hybrid approach for weight assignment in MADM ☆ , 2017 .

[7]  Long-Hao Yang,et al.  Belief Rule Base Structure and Parameter Joint Optimization Under Disjunctive Assumption for Nonlinear Complex System Modeling , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[8]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  A visual interaction consensus model for social network group decision making with trust propagation , 2017, Knowl. Based Syst..

[9]  Yu Zhou,et al.  Structure learning for belief rule base expert system: A comparative study , 2013, Knowl. Based Syst..

[10]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  The mathematical theory of communication , 1950 .

[11]  Huchang Liao,et al.  Novel operations of PLTSs based on the disparity degrees of linguistic terms and their use in designing the probabilistic linguistic ELECTRE III method , 2019, Appl. Soft Comput..

[12]  Chao Fu,et al.  Determining attribute weights for multiple attribute decision analysis with discriminating power in belief distributions , 2017, Knowl. Based Syst..

[13]  John R. Doyle,et al.  Comparing the validity of numerical judgements elicited by direct rating and point allocation: Insights from objectively verifiable perceptual tasks , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Huimin Zhang,et al.  MADM method based on cross-entropy and extended TOPSIS with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 2012, Knowl. Based Syst..

[15]  Chao Ma,et al.  Urban flooding risk assessment based on an integrated k-means cluster algorithm and improved entropy weight method in the region of Haikou, China , 2018, Journal of Hydrology.

[16]  Fanyong Meng,et al.  Linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations and their application to multi-criteria decision making , 2019, Inf. Fusion.

[17]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  Fuzzy Group Decision Making With Incomplete Information Guided by Social Influence , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[18]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  On the combination and normalization of interval-valued belief structures , 2007, Information Sciences.

[19]  Chao Fu,et al.  An interval difference based evidential reasoning approach with unknown attribute weights and utilities of assessment grades , 2015, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[20]  Y. Luan,et al.  Weighted measures based on maximizing deviation for alignment-free sequence comparison , 2017 .

[21]  Wang,et al.  An Information Fusion Method of Fault Diagnosis Based on Interval Basic Probability Assignment , 2011 .

[22]  R. Kalaba,et al.  A comparison of two methods for determining the weights of belonging to fuzzy sets , 1979 .

[23]  Dong-Ling Xu,et al.  A belief rule based expert system for predicting consumer preference in new product development , 2016, Knowl. Based Syst..

[24]  Shuobo Xu,et al.  Construction of regional informatization ecological environment based on the entropy weight modified AHP hierarchy model , 2019, Sustain. Comput. Informatics Syst..

[25]  Fuyuan Xiao,et al.  EFMCDM: Evidential Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Making Based on Belief Entropy , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[26]  Q. H. Wu,et al.  Optimal Power System Dispatch With Wind Power Integrated Using Nonlinear Interval Optimization and Evidential Reasoning Approach , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[27]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Evidential reasoning based preference programming for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Evidential reasoning approach for MADM based on incomplete interval value , 2017, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[29]  Chao Fu,et al.  A method of determining attribute weights in evidential reasoning approach based on incompatibility among attributes , 2015, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[30]  Yong Deng,et al.  Base belief function: an efficient method of conflict management , 2018, J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput..

[31]  Ting-Yu Chen,et al.  Determining objective weights with intuitionistic fuzzy entropy measures: A comparative analysis , 2010, Inf. Sci..

[32]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Dempster–Shafer belief structures with interval valued focal weights , 2001, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[33]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  A cooperative belief rule based decision support system for lymph node metastasis diagnosis in gastric cancer , 2015, Knowl. Based Syst..

[34]  Sen Liu,et al.  Decision making for the selection of cloud vendor: An improved approach under group decision-making with integrated weights and objective/subjective attributes , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[35]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Coalitions of arguments: A tool for handling bipolar argumentation frameworks , 2010 .

[36]  Pornwasin Sirisawat,et al.  Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approaches to prioritizing solutions for reverse logistics barriers , 2018, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[37]  Yong Deng,et al.  A new method to measure the divergence in evidential sensor data fusion , 2019, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[38]  Shanlin Yang,et al.  Assessment of Strategic R&D Projects for Car Manufacturers Based on the Evidential Reasoning Approach , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[39]  R. Yager On the dempster-shafer framework and new combination rules , 1987, Inf. Sci..

[40]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  A minimum adjustment cost feedback mechanism based consensus model for group decision making under social network with distributed linguistic trust , 2018, Inf. Fusion.

[41]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  An MAGDM Approach Combining Numerical Values with Uncertain Linguistic Information and Its Application in Evaluation of R&D Projects , 2010, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[42]  Xu Tan,et al.  Akaike Information Criterion-based conjunctive belief rule base learning for complex system modeling , 2018, Knowl. Based Syst..

[43]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  Evidence combination rule with contrary support in the evidential reasoning approach , 2017, Expert Syst. Appl..

[44]  Yong Deng,et al.  Intuitionistic Evidence Sets , 2018, IEEE Access.

[45]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[46]  Xinyang Deng,et al.  The Negation of a Basic Probability Assignment , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[47]  Qingyuan Zhu,et al.  Improving the evaluation of cross efficiencies: A method based on Shannon entropy weight , 2017, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[48]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  New evidential reasoning rule with both weight and reliability for evidence combination , 2018, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[49]  Jian Ma,et al.  A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[50]  John R. Doyle,et al.  A comparison of three weight elicitation methods: good, better, and best , 2001 .

[51]  Xiaojing Song,et al.  The optimal design of industrial alarm systems based on evidence theory , 2016 .

[52]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Evaluation of urban taxi-carpooling matching schemes based on entropy weight fuzzy matter-element , 2019, Appl. Soft Comput..

[53]  Gang Kou,et al.  Consensus reaching in social network group decision making: Research paradigms and challenges , 2018, Knowl. Based Syst..

[54]  Yang Lin,et al.  Evidential reasoning with discrete belief structures , 2018, Inf. Fusion.

[55]  Ting-Yu Chen,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis using a likelihood-based outranking method based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[56]  G. Mavrotas,et al.  Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method , 1995, Comput. Oper. Res..

[57]  C. Hwang,et al.  Group Decision Making Under Multiple Criteria: Methods and Applications , 1986 .

[58]  Chung-Hsing Yeh,et al.  Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights , 2000, Comput. Oper. Res..

[59]  Jiang Jiang,et al.  BRBcast: A new approach to belief rule-based system parameter learning via extended causal strength logic , 2018, Inf. Sci..

[60]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[61]  Qi Sun,et al.  An attitudinal consensus degree to control the feedback mechanism in group decision making with different adjustment cost , 2019, Knowl. Based Syst..

[62]  Ting-Yu Chen,et al.  Objective weights with intuitionistic fuzzy entropy measures and computational experiment analysis , 2011, Appl. Soft Comput..

[63]  Dong-Ling Xu,et al.  Evidential reasoning rule for evidence combination , 2013, Artif. Intell..

[64]  Shanlin Yang,et al.  Analyzing the applicability of Dempster's rule to the combination of interval-valued belief structures , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[65]  Hamido Fujita,et al.  A Consensus Approach to the Sentiment Analysis Problem Driven by Support‐Based IOWA Majority , 2017, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[66]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Environmental impact assessment using the evidential reasoning approach , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[67]  Fuyuan Xiao,et al.  Multi-sensor data fusion based on the belief divergence measure of evidences and the belief entropy , 2019, Inf. Fusion.

[68]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Combined medical quality assessment using the evidential reasoning approach , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[69]  Zhen Zhang,et al.  Interval-valued Evidence Updating with Reliability and Sensitivity Analysis for Fault Diagnosis , 2016, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[70]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  The evidential reasoning approach for MADA under both probabilistic and fuzzy uncertainties , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[71]  Qiang Zhang,et al.  Multicriteria decision making method based on intuitionistic fuzzy weighted entropy , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[72]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainties , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[73]  Philippe Smets,et al.  The Transferable Belief Model , 1994, Artif. Intell..

[74]  Sun,et al.  Fault Diagnosis Based on the Updating Strategy of Interval-Valued Belief Structures , 2014 .

[75]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Data classification using evidence reasoning rule , 2017, Knowl. Based Syst..

[76]  Mehdi Keshavarz Ghorabaee,et al.  Evaluation of sustainable supply chain risk management using an integrated fuzzy TOPSIS- CRITIC approach , 2018 .

[77]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  The evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision analysis using interval belief degrees , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[78]  R. Green,et al.  Judging Relative Importance: Direct Rating and Point Allocation Are Not Equivalent , 1997, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[79]  Yafei Song,et al.  Combination of interval-valued belief structures based on intuitionistic fuzzy set , 2014, Knowl. Based Syst..

[80]  Ying Luo,et al.  Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making , 2010, Math. Comput. Model..

[81]  Chuan Yue,et al.  Entropy-based weights on decision makers in group decision-making setting with hybrid preference representations , 2017, Appl. Soft Comput..

[82]  Jun Pei,et al.  Optimization and Management in Manufacturing Engineering: Resource Collaborative Optimization and Management through the Internet of Things , 2017 .

[83]  Mi Zhou,et al.  Group Evidential Reasoning Approach for MADA under Fuzziness and Uncertainties , 2013, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..