Moderating effects of information access on project management behavior, performance and perceptions

Abstract Effective project management relies on the timely exchange of information regarding appropriate resource availability, associated scheduling options, and related costs and benefits. At the same time, such information, or lack thereof, can also impact the behavior of project managers in ways that do not directly focus on work objectives but nevertheless affect performance. The research developed in this paper is primarily focused on demonstrating both direct and moderating effects that information can have on decision makers’ actions and perceptions in an environment where multiple projects are pursued simultaneously. In order to study these linkages we designed and executed a controlled experiment designed to simulate aspects common to a multi-party project management environment. Our findings suggest that greater visibility of situational information in this environment impacts project outcomes mainly by affecting a project manager's actions and perceptions regarding both the behavior of others and the priority given to his/her task. The study extends existing information processing theory by developing and examining notions of informed rationality and reciprocity, as well as examining the effect of information on post-task sense making. Insights from the study suggest a set of behavioral issues that should be considered in future information processing and project management research.

[1]  Morgan Swink,et al.  Completing projects on-time: how project acceleration affects new product development , 2003 .

[2]  Francis J. Flynn What have you done for me lately? Temporal adjustments to favor evaluations , 2003 .

[3]  A. Gouldner THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[4]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  A Comparative Study of Distributed Learning Environments on Learning Outcomes , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  A. Adam Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[6]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Resource Sharing Among Sbus: Strategic Antecedents and Administrative Implications , 1986 .

[7]  Robert D. Pritchard,et al.  Implicit theories of performance as artifacts in survey research: A replication and extension☆ , 1978 .

[8]  C. Heckler A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS™ System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling , 1996 .

[9]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[10]  Sea-Jin Chang,et al.  Economic Performance of Group-Affiliated Companies in Korea: Intragroup Resource Sharing and Internal Business Transactions , 2000 .

[11]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Gündüz Ulusoy,et al.  An iterative local constraints based analysis for solving the resource constrained project scheduling problem , 1996 .

[13]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[14]  A. Isen,et al.  The influence of affect on categorization. , 1984 .

[15]  Rainer Kolisch,et al.  Efficient priority rules for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem , 1996 .

[16]  J. O'Neill,et al.  Project management. , 2001, Health management technology.

[17]  Gary E. Bolton,et al.  ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition , 2000 .

[18]  Mohan V. Tatikonda,et al.  Successful execution of product development projects: Balancing firmness and flexibility in the innovation process , 2000 .

[19]  Walter O. Rom,et al.  Analysis of the characteristics of projects in diverse industries , 1998 .

[20]  Sheila M. Puffer Prosocial behavior, noncompliant behavior, and work performance among commission salespeople. , 1987 .

[21]  Robert Neches,et al.  Learning through incremental refinement of procedures , 1987 .

[22]  R. Cooper,et al.  New Problems, New Solutions: Making Portfolio Management More Effective , 2000 .

[23]  Nathan Bennett,et al.  A Case for Procedural Justice Climate: Development and Test of a Multilevel Model. , 2000 .

[24]  Sheldon Zedeck,et al.  Comparison of "joint moderators" in three prediction techniques. , 1971 .

[25]  D. Campbell Task Complexity: A Review and Analysis , 1988 .

[26]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An integrative model of organizational trust, Academy of Management Review, : . , 1995 .

[27]  Kum Khiong Yang,et al.  A comparison of resource allocation and activity scheduling rules in a dynamic multi-project environment , 1993 .

[28]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Enhancing Communication between Marketing and Engineering: The Moderating Role of Relative Functional Identification , 1997 .

[29]  R. Padman,et al.  Heuristic scheduling of capital constrained projects , 1996 .

[30]  C. Cooper,et al.  International review of industrial and organizational psychology , 1986 .

[31]  K. K. Sinha,et al.  Toward a theory of project interdependencies in high tech R & D environments , 2002 .

[32]  S. S. Erenguc,et al.  The resource constrained time/cost tradeoff project scheduling problem with discounted cash flows , 1996 .

[33]  James A. Wall,et al.  An investigation of reciprocity and reinforcement theories of bargaining behavior , 1981 .

[34]  Marco Perugini,et al.  An experimental test of a game-theoretical model of reciprocity. , 2000 .

[35]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Competence Constructs: Two-Stage Multi-Item Scale Development and Validation , 2002, Decis. Sci..

[36]  X. Koufteros Testing a model of pull production: a paradigm for manufacturing research using structural equation modeling , 1999 .

[37]  Deepak Malhotra,et al.  Trust and reciprocity decisions: The differing perspectives of trustors and trusted parties , 2004 .

[38]  D. Norman Learning and Memory , 1982 .

[39]  John O. Summers,et al.  Checking the Success of Manipulations in Marketing Experiments , 1986 .

[40]  H A Simon,et al.  The theory of learning by doing. , 1979, Psychological review.

[41]  Jay R. Galbraith Organization Design , 1977 .

[42]  Daniel G. Bachrach,et al.  Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Critical Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Suggestions for Future Research , 2000 .

[43]  Peter Warr,et al.  The measurement of well-being and other aspects of mental health , 1990 .

[44]  J. Cordery,et al.  Production uncertainty as a contextual moderator of employee reactions to job design. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[45]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[46]  Daniel G. Bachrach,et al.  Attributions of the "causes" of group performance as an alternative explanation of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and organizational performance. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[47]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. , 1986 .

[48]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[49]  Hulya Julie Yazici,et al.  The role of communication in organizational change: an empirical investigation , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[50]  Joyce E. Berg,et al.  Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History , 1995 .

[51]  J. G. Adair,et al.  The Hawthorne effect: A reconsideration of the methodological artifact. , 1984 .

[52]  Margareta Gällstedt,et al.  Working conditions in projects: perceptions of stress and motivation among project team members and project managers , 2003 .

[53]  E. Larson,et al.  Project Management: The Managerial Process , 2002 .

[54]  Thomas Reischl,et al.  The Relationship of Key Factors in the Process of Collaboration , 2003 .

[55]  Arun Rai,et al.  The effects of development process modeling and task uncertainty on development quality performance , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[56]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[57]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[58]  Morgan Swink,et al.  Presenting Geographic Information: Effects of Data Aggregation, Dispersion, and Users' Spatial Orientation , 1999 .

[59]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  End-user computing effectiveness: A structural equation model , 1990 .

[60]  John M. Fitzgerald,et al.  Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History: A Re-examination , 2000 .

[61]  Larry Hatcher,et al.  A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling , 1994 .

[62]  F. Robert Dwyer,et al.  Influence Strategies in Marketing Channels: Measures and Use in Different Relationship Structures , 1992 .

[63]  R. Hyman Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings (Book) , 1982 .

[64]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[65]  Prashant Bordia,et al.  Rumor and Prediction: Making Sense (but Losing Dollars) in the Stock Market , 1997 .

[66]  Susan Rebstock Williams,et al.  Group Support Systems, Power, and Influence in an Organization: A Field Study , 1997 .

[67]  Daniel G. Bachrach,et al.  The Role of Operational Interdependence and Supervisory Experience on Management Assessments of Resource Planning Systems , 2008 .

[68]  Allen Newell,et al.  The psychology of human-computer interaction , 1983 .

[69]  E. Powell Robinson,et al.  Complexity Factors and Intuition-based Methods for Facility Network Design , 1997 .

[70]  M. S. Brenner Practical R&D Project Prioritization , 1994 .