Detailed Investigation of Lumen-Based Tomographic Co-Registration

Imaging procedures are fundamental to disease diagnosis and prognosis, along with intervention evaluation and monitoring progression. Quantitative comparison and integration of information from different image sets require image coregistration, a process typically performed manually by clinicians. Automated and semi-automated procedures rely upon features that require extensive pre-processing or may not be visible and, as such, are not universally applicable across acquisitions and modalities, limiting applicability. We present a simple yet reliable fully-automated method that registers tomographic vascular images based only on lumen contours. The results both in multimodal and pre-/post-intervention datasets demonstrated the flexibility and robustness of our method. Excellent agreement was found between method results and manual longitudinal coregistration ($0.23\pm 0.20$ mm). Rotational co-registration accuracy was also high $(8.1^{\circ}\pm 8.0^{\circ})$, but required visible fiduciary landmarks; in the absence of such, accuracy decreased to $61.3^{\circ}\pm 66.4^{\circ}$. Sensitivity analyses indicate that, while care must be taken when overlapping segments are very short or lacking variability, lumen-based vascular image co-registration offers a robust, straightforward, and widely applicable approach.

[1]  Tong Fang,et al.  Semi-automatic matching of OCT and IVUS images for image fusion , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[2]  Jacques Ohayon,et al.  Detection of high-risk atherosclerotic plaque: report of the NHLBI Working Group on current status and future directions. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[3]  A. Jeremias,et al.  Precision percutaneous coronary intervention: Is optical coherence tomography co‐registration the future? , 2018, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[4]  Habib Samady,et al.  Framework to Co-register Longitudinal Virtual Histology-Intravascular Ultrasound Data in the Circumferential Direction , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Petia Radeva,et al.  Automatic non-rigid temporal alignment of intravascular ultrasound sequences: method and quantitative validation. , 2013, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[6]  Elazer R. Edelman,et al.  A Mechanical Approach for Smooth Surface Fitting to Delineate Vessel Walls in Optical Coherence Tomography Images , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Kpalma Kidiyo,et al.  A Survey of Shape Feature Extraction Techniques , 2008 .

[8]  L. Räber,et al.  Intracoronary imaging of coronary atherosclerosis: validation for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. , 2016, European heart journal.

[9]  Nicola Martini,et al.  Multimodality Imaging for Interventional Cardiology. , 2017, Current pharmaceutical design.

[10]  Milan Sonka,et al.  Simultaneous Registration of Location and Orientation in Intravascular Ultrasound Pullbacks Pairs Via 3D Graph-Based Optimization , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Habib Samady,et al.  Evaluation of a framework for the co-registration of intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography coronary artery pullbacks. , 2016, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Agnes Pasquet,et al.  Imaging the vulnerable plaque. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  P. Serruys,et al.  Intravascular multimodality imaging: feasibility and role in the evaluation of coronary plaque pathology , 2017, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[14]  Gary S. Mintz,et al.  Clinical utility of intravascular imaging and physiology in coronary artery disease. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  E. Braunwald,et al.  A tale of coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  Akiko Maehara,et al.  Consensus standards for acquisition, measurement, and reporting of intravascular optical coherence tomography studies: a report from the International Working Group for Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Standardization and Validation. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  Mariusz Oszust,et al.  Interobserver variability in quality assessment of magnetic resonance images , 2020, BMC Medical Imaging.