The Fidelity of Dynamic Signaling by Noisy Biomolecular Networks

Cells live in changing, dynamic environments. To understand cellular decision-making, we must therefore understand how fluctuating inputs are processed by noisy biomolecular networks. Here we present a general methodology for analyzing the fidelity with which different statistics of a fluctuating input are represented, or encoded, in the output of a signaling system over time. We identify two orthogonal sources of error that corrupt perfect representation of the signal: dynamical error, which occurs when the network responds on average to other features of the input trajectory as well as to the signal of interest, and mechanistic error, which occurs because biochemical reactions comprising the signaling mechanism are stochastic. Trade-offs between these two errors can determine the system's fidelity. By developing mathematical approaches to derive dynamics conditional on input trajectories we can show, for example, that increased biochemical noise (mechanistic error) can improve fidelity and that both negative and positive feedback degrade fidelity, for standard models of genetic autoregulation. For a group of cells, the fidelity of the collective output exceeds that of an individual cell and negative feedback then typically becomes beneficial. We can also predict the dynamic signal for which a given system has highest fidelity and, conversely, how to modify the network design to maximize fidelity for a given dynamic signal. Our approach is general, has applications to both systems and synthetic biology, and will help underpin studies of cellular behavior in natural, dynamic environments.

[1]  M. Thattai,et al.  Intrinsic noise in gene regulatory networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  C. Stadtländer,et al.  Quantitative biology: from molecular to cellular systems , 2015, Journal of biological dynamics.

[3]  Clive G Bowsher STOCHASTIC KINETIC MODELS: DYNAMIC INDEPENDENCE, MODULARITY AND GRAPHS. , 2010, Annals of statistics.

[4]  Wei Jiang,et al.  Collisionless bounce resonance heating in dual-frequency capacitively coupled plasmas. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[5]  P. Swain,et al.  Strategies for cellular decision-making , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[6]  M. Sano,et al.  Regulatory dynamics of synthetic gene networks with positive feedback. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  F. Tostevin,et al.  Mutual information between input and output trajectories of biochemical networks. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[8]  K. Blaum,et al.  Comment on "Intruder configurations in the A=33 isobars: 33Mg and 33Al". , 2010, Physical review letters.

[9]  P. R. ten Wolde,et al.  Signal detection, modularity, and the correlation between extrinsic and intrinsic noise in biochemical networks. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[10]  Filipe Tostevin,et al.  Mutual information in time-varying biochemical systems. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  M. Elowitz,et al.  Functional roles for noise in genetic circuits , 2010, Nature.

[12]  A. U.S.,et al.  Predictability , Complexity , and Learning , 2002 .

[13]  Johan Paulsson,et al.  Separating intrinsic from extrinsic fluctuations in dynamic biological systems , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Megan N. McClean,et al.  Signal processing by the HOG MAP kinase pathway , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Ilya Nemenman,et al.  Information theory and adaptation , 2010, 1011.5466.

[16]  A. Oudenaarden,et al.  Cellular Decision Making and Biological Noise: From Microbes to Mammals , 2011, Cell.

[17]  Clive G. Bowsher,et al.  Identifying sources of variation and the flow of information in biochemical networks , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Bo Hu,et al.  Effects of input noise on a simple biochemical switch. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[19]  P. Swain,et al.  Noisy information processing through transcriptional regulation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  C. Durniak,et al.  Soliton interaction in a complex plasma. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[21]  U. Alon,et al.  Negative autoregulation speeds the response times of transcription networks. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  Anirvan M. Sengupta,et al.  Engineering aspects of enzymatic signal transduction: photoreceptors in the retina. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[23]  W. Fiers,et al.  Treatment of murine colitis by Lactococcus lactis secreting interleukin-10. , 2000, Science.

[24]  F. Schmidt-Kaler,et al.  Nuclear charge radii of 7,9,10Be and the one-neutron halo nucleus 11Be. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[25]  A. Brivanlou,et al.  Signal Transduction and the Control of Gene Expression , 2002, Science.

[26]  F. Tostevin,et al.  Effect of feedback on the fidelity of information transmission of time-varying signals. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[27]  D. Gillespie The chemical Langevin equation , 2000 .

[28]  G. K. Ackers,et al.  Quantitative model for gene regulation by lambda phage repressor. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Peter S Swain,et al.  Efficient attenuation of stochasticity in gene expression through post-transcriptional control. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  D. Sherrington Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry , 1983 .

[31]  Priscilla E. M. Purnick,et al.  The second wave of synthetic biology: from modules to systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[32]  Clive G. Bowsher,et al.  Information processing by biochemical networks: a dynamic approach , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[33]  Julien F. Ollivier,et al.  Colored extrinsic fluctuations and stochastic gene expression , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[34]  P. Swain,et al.  Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to stochasticity in gene expression , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  Margaritis Voliotis,et al.  The magnitude and colour of noise in genetic negative feedback systems , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[36]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Environmentally controlled invasion of cancer cells by engineered bacteria. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  Norbert Wiener,et al.  Extrapolation, Interpolation, and Smoothing of Stationary Time Series , 1964 .

[38]  Xia Sheng,et al.  Bayesian design of synthetic biological systems , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  J. Elf,et al.  Fast evaluation of fluctuations in biochemical networks with the linear noise approximation. , 2003, Genome research.

[40]  Vahid Shahrezaei,et al.  Analytical distributions for stochastic gene expression , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Tetsuya J Kobayashi,et al.  Implementation of dynamic Bayesian decision making by intracellular kinetics. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[42]  W. Ebeling Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry , 1995 .

[43]  I. Nemenman,et al.  Information Transduction Capacity of Noisy Biochemical Signaling Networks , 2011, Science.

[44]  P. R. ten Wolde,et al.  Role of spatial averaging in the precision of gene expression patterns. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[45]  Paul Martin,et al.  Epigenetic reprogramming during wound healing: loss of polycomb‐mediated silencing may enable upregulation of repair genes , 2009, EMBO reports.