If I Upload it, will They Come? using Lazy User Theory to Explain Student Use of Optional Online Learning Resources

Instructors are encouraged to provide a rich array of complementary learning resources to students to cater to their different learning styles. More and more of these resources are being made available online. The way students choose amongst different optional learning resources is poorly understood. The paper reports the findings of a study that examined differences in student perceptions of different web-based learning support services such as groupware and online courses. Based on a sample of 55 undergraduate business school students in an e-commerce major, the findings indicate that effort minimization strongly influences student use of administrative services but less so more learning related services. The results have important implications for trainers and teachers involved in the design and implementation of web based learning resources and services. Keywords: Learning resources, learning management system, lazy user theory, technology acceptance model

[1]  Luis L. Martins,et al.  A Model of Business School Students' Acceptance of a Web-Based Course , 2004 .

[2]  R. Hoyle Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research , 1999 .

[3]  Kathleen McFadden,et al.  Time Management Skills of Undergraduate Business Students , 1992 .

[4]  Kathy Robinson,et al.  Podcasts are not for everyone , 2012, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[5]  Osu Lilje,et al.  Use and perceptions of use of a blended learning resource: are students engaging with the materials? , 2006 .

[6]  Kenneth L. Miller,et al.  Using instructional theory to facilitate communication in Web-based courses , 1999, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[7]  Chang Liu,et al.  An Application of the UTAUT Model for Understanding Student Perceptions Using Course Management Software , 2007, Communications of the IIMA.

[8]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares , 1999 .

[9]  P. Trout,et al.  Disengaged students and the decline of academic standards , 1997 .

[10]  Matthew Inglis,et al.  Individual differences in students' use of optional learning resources , 2011, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[11]  Jane Dillard-Eggers,et al.  Evidence On The Effectiveness Of On-Line Homework , 2008 .

[12]  William Joseph Donovan,et al.  Investigation of student use of Web -based tutorial materials and understanding of chemistry concepts , 2001 .

[13]  Mary Frances Rice,et al.  Impacts of an online-supported, resource-based learning environment: does one size fit all? , 2003, Distance Education.

[14]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[16]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[17]  A. Richardson,et al.  AN ECOLOGY OF LEARNING AND THE ROLE OF eLEARNING IN THE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT , 2002 .

[18]  Hassan M. Selim,et al.  An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course websites , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[19]  Chee-Kit Looi,et al.  Enhancing learning ecology on the Internet , 2001, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[20]  Sung Youl Park,et al.  An Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding University Students' Behavioral Intention to Use e-Learning , 2009, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[21]  Mark Grabe,et al.  Optional student use of online lecture resources: resource preferences, performance and lecture attendance , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[22]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Book Reviews : The Social Life of Information By John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000. 320 pages , 2000 .

[23]  A ToddPeter,et al.  Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology , 1992 .

[24]  Michel Tenenhaus,et al.  PLS path modeling , 2005, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[25]  Mary T. Curren,et al.  How Hard Do I Have to Work? Student and Faculty Expectations Regarding University Work , 2005 .

[26]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication , 1992, MIS Q..

[27]  M. Hutchinson The Social Life of Information , 2002 .

[28]  Geraldine Clarebout,et al.  Tool-use in a blended undergraduate course: In Search of user profiles , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[29]  Martin Weale Lazy Students? A Study of Student Time Use , 2004 .

[30]  Roy Radner,et al.  On the allocation of effort , 1975 .

[31]  Wynne W. Chin Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[32]  Mikael Collan,et al.  Lazy User Theory: A Dynamic Model to Understand User Selection of Products and Services , 2009, 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[33]  Helen Larkin,et al.  But they won't come to lectures ... : the impact of recorded lectures on student experience and attendance , 2010 .

[34]  Maslin Masrom,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model and E-learning , 2007 .

[35]  Cameron Guthrie,et al.  Towards Greater Learner Control: Web Supported Project-Based Learning , 2010, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..