Improving Activity Prediction of Adenosine A2B Receptor Antagonists by Nonlinear Models

This study deals on estimation of ligand activity with its descriptors. So, to achieve this goal, two different approaches were implemented. In the first one, the intervals between samples were determined. But in the second method, the intervals were clustered with k-means method. Afterwards, best descriptors of each ligands were extracted with genetic algorithm. Then, observations were classified with One-Against-All method. Finally, the activity of each ligands were estimated by forty percent of samples. In the first method, AUC values were between fifty four to ninety seven percent. For second approaches, there were about ninety seven percent.

[1]  M. Jalali-Heravi,et al.  Classification of anti-HIV compounds using counterpropagation artificial neural networks and decision trees , 2011, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[2]  Jens Meiler,et al.  Benchmarking Ligand-Based Virtual High-Throughput Screening with the PubChem Database , 2013, Molecules.

[3]  Ahmad Mani-Varnosfaderani,et al.  Integrated One‐Against‐One Classifiers as Tools for Virtual Screening of Compound Databases: A Case Study with CNS Inhibitors , 2013, Molecular informatics.

[4]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  Integration of virtual and high-throughput screening , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[5]  Dariusz Plewczynski,et al.  Assessing Different Classification Methods for Virtual Screening , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[6]  Gisbert Schneider,et al.  Computer-based de novo design of drug-like molecules , 2005, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[7]  D. Bojanic,et al.  Impact of high-throughput screening in biomedical research , 2011, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[8]  A Abdo,et al.  Similarity-based virtual screening using bayesian inference network , 2009 .

[9]  Sally R. Ellingson,et al.  High-throughput virtual molecular docking: Hadoop implementation of AutoDock4 on a private cloud , 2011, ECMLS '11.

[10]  Sally R. Ellingson,et al.  High‐throughput virtual molecular docking with AutoDockCloud , 2014, Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp..

[11]  Jeremy C. Smith,et al.  Task‐parallel message passing interface implementation of Autodock4 for docking of very large databases of compounds using high‐performance super‐computers , 2011, J. Comput. Chem..

[12]  Chang-Guo Zhan,et al.  Ligand-Based Virtual Screening Approach Using a New Scoring Function , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[13]  David R Spring,et al.  Rational methods for the selection of diverse screening compounds. , 2011, ACS chemical biology.

[14]  Hans-Joachim Böhm,et al.  A guide to drug discovery: Hit and lead generation: beyond high-throughput screening , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[15]  Sergios Theodoridis,et al.  Introduction to Pattern Recognition: A Matlab Approach , 2010 .