Altered functional connectivity in the motor network after traumatic brain injury

Background: A large proportion of survivors of traumatic brain injury (TBI) have persistent cognitive impairments, the profile of which does not always correspond to the size and location of injuries. One possible explanation could be that TBI-induced damage extends beyond obvious lesion sites to affect remote brain networks. We explored this hypothesis in the context of a simple and well-characterized network, the motor network. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to establish the residual integrity of the motor network as an important proof of principle of abnormal connectivity in TBI. Methods: fMRI data were obtained from 12 right-handed patients and 9 healthy controls while they performed the finger-thumb opposition task with the right hand. We used both conventional and psychophysiologic interaction (PPI) analyses to examine the integrity of functional connections from brain regions we found to be activated in the paradigm we used. Results: As expected, the analysis showed significant activations of the left primary motor cortex (M1), right cerebellum (Ce), and bilateral supplementary motor area (SMA) in controls. However, only the activation of M1 survived robust statistical thresholding in patients. In controls, the PPI analysis revealed that left M1, SMA, and right Ce positively interacted with the left frontal cortex and negatively interacted with the right supramarginal gyrus. In patients, we observed no negative interaction and reduced interhemispheric interactions from these seed regions. Conclusions: These observations suggest that patients display compromised activation and connectivity patterns during the finger-thumb opposition task, which may imply functional reorganization of motor networks following TBI.

[1]  Kent A. Kiehl,et al.  Neural correlates of the processing of another’s mistakes: A possible underpinning for social and observational learning , 2008, NeuroImage.

[2]  H. Diener,et al.  Impaired movement-related potentials in acute frontal traumatic brain injury , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The Cortical Motor System , 2001, Neuron.

[4]  T. McAllister,et al.  Neuropsychiatric sequelae of head injuries. , 1992, The Psychiatric clinics of North America.

[5]  H. Levin,et al.  Validity and sensitivity to change of the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale in mild to moderate traumatic brain injury. , 2001, Journal of neurotrauma.

[6]  R. Nudo Adaptive plasticity in motor cortex: implications for rehabilitation after brain injury. , 2003, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[7]  Holger Wiese,et al.  Self-initiated movements in chronic prefrontal traumatic brain injury: An event-related functional MRI study , 2006, NeuroImage.

[8]  P. Matthews,et al.  Functional MRI cerebral activation and deactivation during finger movement , 2000, Neurology.

[9]  Habib Benali,et al.  Relation between brain lesion location and clinical outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: A diffusion tensor imaging study using voxel‐based approaches , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[10]  W. Walker,et al.  Motor impairment after severe traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal multicenter study. , 2007, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[11]  Michael Andres,et al.  Double dissociation between motor and visual imagery in the posterior parietal cortex. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  Craig A Branch,et al.  Multifocal white matter ultrastructural abnormalities in mild traumatic brain injury with cognitive disability: a voxel-wise analysis of diffusion tensor imaging. , 2008, Journal of neurotrauma.

[13]  S P Wise,et al.  Distributed modular architectures linking basal ganglia, cerebellum, and cerebral cortex: their role in planning and controlling action. , 1995, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  Leonardo G Cohen,et al.  Interhemispheric inhibition between primary motor cortices: what have we learned? , 2009, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  Peter Gruen,et al.  Novel diffusion tensor imaging methodology to detect and quantify injured regions and affected brain pathways in traumatic brain injury. , 2010, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[16]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[17]  M. Hallett,et al.  Functional properties of brain areas associated with motor execution and imagery. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Psychophysiological and Modulatory Interactions in Neuroimaging , 1997, NeuroImage.

[19]  L. Cohen,et al.  Neuroimaging Patterns Associated with Motor Control in Traumatic Brain Injury , 2006, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[20]  E. Hall,et al.  Spatial and temporal characteristics of neurodegeneration after controlled cortical impact in mice: more than a focal brain injury. , 2005, Journal of neurotrauma.

[21]  U Sabatini,et al.  Abnormal motor preparation in severe traumatic brain injury with good recovery. , 2005, Journal of neurotrauma.

[22]  M. Erb,et al.  Activation of Cortical and Cerebellar Motor Areas during Executed and Imagined Hand Movements: An fMRI Study , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  M. Potts,et al.  Models of Traumatic Cerebellar Injury , 2009, The Cerebellum.

[24]  Rakesh K. Gupta,et al.  Comparative evaluation of corpus callosum DTI metrics in acute mild and moderate traumatic brain injury: Its correlation with neuropsychometric tests , 2009, Brain injury.

[25]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Perseverative interference in monkeys following selective lesions of the inferior prefrontal convexity , 1970, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  K. Meador,et al.  Functional MRI cerebral activation and deactivation during finger movement , 2000, Neurology.

[27]  Eugene Tunik,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Frontal Operculum and Supramarginal Gyrus Disrupts Planning of Outcome-Based Hand–Object Interactions , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Jeremy R. Reynolds,et al.  Distinct neural circuits support transient and sustained processes in prospective memory and working memory. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  M. Hallett,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetry of ipsilateral motor cortex activation during unimanual motor tasks: further evidence for motor dominance , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[30]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Interhemispheric interaction between human dorsal premotor and contralateral primary motor cortex , 2004, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  J. Liepert,et al.  Inhibition of ipsilateral motor cortex during phasic generation of low force , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[32]  F. Fazekas,et al.  Impairment of movement-associated brain deactivation in multiple sclerosis: further evidence for a functional pathology of interhemispheric neuronal inhibition , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  L. Deecke,et al.  The Preparation and Execution of Self-Initiated and Externally-Triggered Movement: A Study of Event-Related fMRI , 2002, NeuroImage.

[34]  Robert Chen,et al.  Exploring the connectivity between the cerebellum and motor cortex in humans , 2004, The Journal of physiology.

[35]  B. Jennett,et al.  Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. , 1974, Lancet.

[36]  Sterling C. Johnson,et al.  Neuroimaging correlates of the Halstead Finger Tapping Test several years post-traumatic brain injury , 2004, Brain injury.