Validation of Software Gating: A Practical Technology for Respiratory Motion Correction in PET.

Purpose To assess the performance of hardware- and software-gating technologies in terms of qualitative and quantitative characteristics of respiratory motion in positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Materials and Methods Between 2010 and 2013, 219 fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET examinations were performed in 116 patients for assessment of pulmonary nodules. All patients provided informed consent in this institutional review board-approved study. Acquisitions were reconstructed as respiratory-gated images by using hardware-derived respiratory triggers and software-derived signal (via an automated postprocessing method). Asymmetry was evaluated in the joint distribution of reader preference, and linear mixed models were used to evaluate differences in outcomes according to gating type. Results In blind reviews of reconstructed gated images, software was selected as superior 16.9% of the time (111 of 657 image sets; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.0%, 19.8%), and hardware was selected as superior 6.2% of the time (41 of 657 image sets; 95% CI: 4.4%, 8.1%). Of the image sets, 76.9% (505 of 657; 95% CI: 73.6%, 80.1%) were judged as having indistinguishable motion quality. Quantitative analysis demonstrated that the two gating strategies exhibited similar performance, and the performance of both was significantly different from that of nongated images. The mean increase ± standard deviation in lesion maximum standardized uptake value was 42.2% ± 38.9 between nongated and software-gated images, and lesion full width at half maximum values decreased by 9.9% ± 9.6. Conclusion Compared with vendor-supplied respiratory-gating hardware methods, software gating performed favorably, both qualitatively and quantitatively. Fully automated gating is a feasible approach to motion correction of PET images. (©) RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

[1]  M. Kenward,et al.  Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. , 1997, Biometrics.

[2]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Strategies for Motion Tracking and Correction in PET. , 2007, PET clinics.

[3]  Paul K Marsden,et al.  Impact of respiratory motion correction and spatial resolution on lesion detection in PET: a simulation study based on real MR dynamic data , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  W. Oyen,et al.  PET in the management of locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC , 2015, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[5]  Drew A. Torigian,et al.  Repeatability of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Prospective Assessment in 2 Multicenter Trials , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  Holger Schmidt,et al.  Reconstruction-Incorporated Respiratory Motion Correction in Clinical Simultaneous PET/MR Imaging for Oncology Applications , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  Florian Büther,et al.  Detection of respiratory tumour motion using intrinsic list mode-driven gating in positron emission tomography , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[8]  J. Ware,et al.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data. , 1982, Biometrics.

[9]  Kris Thielemans,et al.  Extracting a respiratory signal from raw dynamic PET data that contain tracer kinetics , 2013 .

[10]  Jianfeng He,et al.  A Novel Method for Respiratory Motion Gated With Geometric Sensitivity of the Scanner in 3D PET , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[11]  Phillip J Koo,et al.  Carpe Datum: A Consideration of the Barriers and Potential of Data-Driven PET Innovation. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[12]  W. Oyen,et al.  The impact of respiratory gated positron emission tomography on clinical staging and management of patients with lung cancer. , 2015, Lung cancer.

[13]  Kris Thielemans,et al.  Device-less gating for PET/CT using PCA , 2011, 2011 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[14]  N. Freedman,et al.  Gating, enhanced gating, and beyond: information utilization strategies for motion management, applied to preclinical PET , 2013, EJNMMI Research.

[15]  Doumit Daou,et al.  Respiratory motion handling is mandatory to accomplish the high-resolution PET destiny , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[16]  Valentino Bettinardi,et al.  Respiratory gated PET/CT in a European multicentre retrospective study: added diagnostic value in detection and characterization of lung lesions , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[17]  T. Ruddy,et al.  Single-Phase CT Aligned to Gated PET for Respiratory Motion Correction in Cardiac PET/CT , 2010, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  Paul E Kinahan,et al.  The impact of respiratory motion on tumor quantification and delineation in static PET/CT imaging , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  A. Agresti,et al.  Multivariate Extensions of McNemar's Test , 2006, Biometrics.

[20]  C. Ling,et al.  Effect of respiratory gating on quantifying PET images of lung cancer. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  Jonathan H Chung,et al.  Frequency based gating: An alternative, conformal, approach to 4D PET data utilization. , 2016, Medical physics.

[22]  D. Visvikis,et al.  Respiratory synchronized CT image generation from 4D PET acquisitions , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[23]  V. Bettinardi,et al.  Detection and compensation of organ/lesion motion using 4D-PET/CT respiratory gated acquisition techniques. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[24]  Xiaoyi Jiang,et al.  Transforming Static CT in Gated PET/CT Studies to Multiple Respiratory Phases , 2006, 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR'06).

[25]  David Atkinson,et al.  Practical PET Respiratory Motion Correction in Clinical PET/MR , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[26]  Tomas Kron,et al.  A prospective investigation into the clinical impact of 4D-PET/CT in the characterisation of solitary pulmonary nodules , 2014, Cancer Imaging.

[27]  Florian Büther,et al.  On transcending the impasse of respiratory motion correction applications in routine clinical imaging - a consideration of a fully automated data driven motion control framework , 2014, EJNMMI Physics.

[28]  Claudia Kuntner,et al.  A new fast and fully automated software based algorithm for extracting respiratory signal from raw PET data and its comparison to other methods. , 2010, Medical physics.

[29]  Paul J Schleyer,et al.  Extension of a data-driven gating technique to 3D, whole body PET studies , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  R. Lecomte,et al.  Respiratory gating for 3-dimensional PET of the thorax: feasibility and initial results. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[31]  Jarmo Teuho,et al.  A novel respiratory gating method for oncologic positron emission tomography based on bioimpedance approach , 2015, Annals of Nuclear Medicine.

[32]  S. Nehmeh,et al.  Respiratory motion in positron emission tomography/computed tomography: a review. , 2008, Seminars in nuclear medicine.