Directed evolution of the quorum-sensing regulator EsaR for increased signal sensitivity.

The use of cell-cell communication or "quorum sensing (QS)" elements from Gram-negative Proteobacteria has enabled synthetic biologists to begin engineering systems composed of multiple interacting organisms. However, additional tools are necessary if we are to progress toward synthetic microbial consortia that exhibit more complex, dynamic behaviors. EsaR from Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii is a QS regulator that binds to DNA as an apoprotein and releases the DNA when it binds to its cognate signal molecule, 3-oxohexanoyl-homoserine lactone (3OC6HSL). In the absence of 3OC6HSL, EsaR binds to DNA and can act as either an activator or a repressor of transcription. Gene expression from P(esaR), which is repressed by wild-type EsaR, requires 100- to 1000-fold higher concentrations of signal than commonly used QS activators, such as LuxR and LasR. Here we have identified EsaR variants with increased sensitivity to 3OC6HSL using directed evolution and a dual ON/OFF screening strategy. Although we targeted EsaR-dependent derepression of P(esaR), our EsaR variants also showed increased 3OC6HSL sensitivity at a second promoter, P(esaS), which is activated by EsaR in the absence of 3OC6HSL. Here, the increase in AHL sensitivity led to gene expression being turned off at lower concentrations of 3OC6HSL. Overall, we have increased the signal sensitivity of EsaR more than 70-fold and generated a set of EsaR variants that recognize 3OC6HSL concentrations ranging over 4 orders of magnitude. QS-dependent transcriptional regulators that bind to DNA and are active in the absence of a QS signal represent a new set of tools for engineering cell-cell communication-dependent gene expression.

[1]  E. Greenberg,et al.  Long-Chain Acyl-Homoserine Lactone Quorum-Sensing Regulation of Rhodobacter capsulatus Gene Transfer Agent Production , 2002, Journal of bacteriology.

[2]  N. Moran,et al.  The evolutionary history of quorum-sensing systems in bacteria. , 2004, Molecular biology and evolution.

[3]  E. Greenberg,et al.  Crystal structure of QscR, a Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensing signal receptor , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Wilfred F. van Gunsteren,et al.  A generalized reaction field method for molecular dynamics simulations , 1995 .

[5]  Bonnie L Bassler,et al.  A strategy for antagonizing quorum sensing. , 2011, Molecular cell.

[6]  K. Winzer,et al.  Look who's talking: communication and quorum sensing in the bacterial world , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  K. Nealson,et al.  Bacterial bioluminescence: Isolation and genetic analysis of functions from Vibrio fischeri , 1983, Cell.

[8]  Jared R. Leadbetter,et al.  Directed evolution of Vibrio fischeri LuxR for increased sensitivity to a broad spectrum of acyl‐homoserine lactones , 2004, Molecular microbiology.

[9]  S. C. Winans,et al.  Identification of amino acid residues of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens quorum‐sensing regulator TraR that are critical for positive control of transcription , 2004, Molecular microbiology.

[10]  Yiannis N. Kaznessis,et al.  Forward engineering of synthetic bio-logical and gates , 2008 .

[11]  A. Trott Amino Acid Residues in LuxR Critical for its Mechanism of Transcriptional Activation during Quorum Sensing , 2000 .

[12]  F. Arnold,et al.  Engineering microbial consortia: a new frontier in synthetic biology. , 2008, Trends in biotechnology.

[13]  Jared R. Leadbetter,et al.  Dual selection enhances the signaling specificity of a variant of the quorum-sensing transcriptional activator LuxR , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[14]  Junmei Wang,et al.  Automatic parameterization of force field by systematic search and genetic algorithms , 2001, J. Comput. Chem..

[15]  J. Marshall Quorum sensing , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Frank Bernhard,et al.  The autoregulatory role of EsaR, a quorum‐sensing regulator in Pantoea stewartii ssp. stewartii: evidence for a repressor function , 2002, Molecular microbiology.

[17]  E. Greenberg,et al.  Overproduction and purification of the luxR gene product: Transcriptional activator of the Vibrio fischeri luminescence system. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  M. Urbanowski,et al.  The Quorum Sensing Negative Regulators EsaR and ExpREcc, Homologues within the LuxR Family, Retain the Ability To Function as Activators of Transcription , 2003, Journal of bacteriology.

[19]  R. Cortese,et al.  The crystal structure of the quorum sensing protein TraR bound to its autoinducer and target DNA , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[20]  E. P. Greenberg,et al.  A new class of homoserine lactone quorum-sensing signals , 2008, Nature.

[21]  M. Surette,et al.  Communication in bacteria: an ecological and evolutionary perspective , 2006, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[22]  Mechanisms and synthetic modulators of AHL-dependent gene regulation. , 2011, Chemical reviews.

[23]  C. Collins,et al.  Engineering multicellular systems by cell-cell communication. , 2009, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[24]  Patrick C Cirino,et al.  Generating mutant libraries using error-prone PCR. , 2003, Methods in molecular biology.

[25]  A. Stevens,et al.  Amino Acid Residues in LuxR Critical for Its Mechanism of Transcriptional Activation during Quorum Sensing inVibrio fischeri , 2001, Journal of bacteriology.

[26]  E. P. Greenberg,et al.  Conversion of the Vibrio fischeriTranscriptional Activator, LuxR, to a Repressor , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[27]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Robust multicellular computing using genetically encoded NOR gates and chemical ‘wires’ , 2011, Nature.

[28]  S. C. Winans,et al.  LuxR‐type quorum‐sensing regulators that are detached from common scents , 2010, Molecular microbiology.

[29]  A. Stevens,et al.  Probing the Impact of Ligand Binding on the Acyl-Homoserine Lactone-Hindered Transcription Factor EsaR of Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii , 2011, Journal of bacteriology.

[30]  J. Garey,et al.  The evolution of bacterial LuxI and LuxR quorum sensing regulators. , 2001, Microbiology.

[31]  E. P. Greenberg,et al.  Reversible Acyl-Homoserine Lactone Binding to Purified Vibrio fischeri LuxR Protein , 2004, Journal of bacteriology.

[32]  홀덴 데이비드윌리암,et al.  Identification of genes , 1995 .

[33]  M. Silverman,et al.  Identification of genes and gene products necessary for bacterial bioluminescence. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  S. Busby,et al.  Activation and repression of transcription initiation in bacteria. , 2001, Essays in biochemistry.

[35]  W. Nasser,et al.  New insights into the regulatory mechanisms of the LuxR family of quorum sensing regulators , 2007, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[36]  B. Bassler,et al.  Bacterial quorum-sensing network architectures. , 2009, Annual review of genetics.

[37]  M. Ptashne,et al.  Transcriptional activation by recruitment , 1997, Nature.

[38]  E. P. Greenberg,et al.  Quorum Sensing in Vibrio fischeri: Analysis of the LuxR DNA Binding Region by Alanine-Scanning Mutagenesis , 2001, Journal of bacteriology.

[39]  E. Greenberg,et al.  Regulation of gene expression by cell-to-cell communication: acyl-homoserine lactone quorum sensing. , 2001, Annual review of genetics.

[40]  E. Greenberg,et al.  Generation of cell-to-cell signals in quorum sensing: acyl homoserine lactone synthase activity of a purified Vibrio fischeri LuxI protein. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  Thomas G. Platt,et al.  What's in a name? The semantics of quorum sensing. , 2010, Trends in microbiology.

[42]  S. C. Winans,et al.  Site‐directed mutagenesis of a LuxR‐type quorum‐sensing transcription factor: alteration of autoinducer specificity , 2003, Molecular microbiology.

[43]  S. C. Winans,et al.  The quorum‐sensing transcription factor TraR decodes its DNA binding site by direct contacts with DNA bases and by detection of DNA flexibility , 2007, Molecular microbiology.

[44]  Ann M. Stevens,et al.  Structure/Function Analysis of the Pantoea stewartii Quorum-Sensing Regulator EsaR as an Activator of Transcription , 2009, Journal of bacteriology.

[45]  F. Rojo,et al.  Mechanisms of transcriptional repression. , 2001, Current opinion in microbiology.

[46]  E. Greenberg,et al.  Signalling: Listening in on bacteria: acyl-homoserine lactone signalling , 2002, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[47]  John C. Anderson,et al.  Structure of a bacterial quorum-sensing transcription factor complexed with pheromone and DNA , 2011, Nature.

[48]  M. Elowitz,et al.  Programming gene expression with combinatorial promoters , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[49]  M. Surette,et al.  pfs-Dependent Regulation of Autoinducer 2 Production in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium , 2002, Journal of bacteriology.

[50]  Jasmine Shong,et al.  Towards synthetic microbial consortia for bioprocessing. , 2012, Current opinion in biotechnology.