Methodology for the Iterative Evaluation of Prototype Head-Mounted Displays in Virtual Environments: Visual Acuity Metrics

Head-mounted display design is an iterative process. As such, a standardized user-centered assessment protocol of head-mounted performance during each phase of prototype development should be employed. In this paper, we first describe a methodology for assessing prototype head-mounted displays and virtual environments using visual performance metrics. We then present an application of the methodology using a prototype of a projection head-mounted display and the first module of our assessment: resolution visual acuity as a function of contrast. To evaluate the total system, we also used three different light levels and two different types of projection materials. Results from both studies indicate that the visual acuity metric resolution accurately identified reductions in user visual acuity caused by parameters of the projection display and those of the phase conjugate material. Results further support the need for benchmark metrics that allow comparison of prototype head-mounted performance through each stage of design.

[1]  J. Gaddum.  Probit Analysis , 1948, Nature.

[2]  J. Lewis,et al.  Probit Analysis (3rd ed). , 1972 .

[3]  H. Schiffman.  Sensation and Perception: An Integrated Approach , 1976 .

[4]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Microcomputer-based estimation of psychophysical thresholds: The Best PEST , 1982 .

[5]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  Joseph B. Murdoch.  Illumination Engineering: From Edison's Lamp to the Laser , 1985 .

[7]  David Meister,et al.  Behavioral Analysis and Measurement Methods , 1985 .

[8]  K. N. N. Leibovic,et al.  Science of Vision , 1990, Springer New York.

[9]  Roy Kalawsky,et al.  The science of virtual reality and virtual environments - a technical, scientific and engineering reference on virtual environments , 1993 .

[10]  James P. Bliss,et al.  The Virtual Environment Performance Assessment Battery (VEPAB):Development and Evaluation1 , 1994, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[11]  Terri Gullickson.  Evaluation of Human Work: A Practical Ergonomics Methodology. , 1996 .

[12]  Harry L. Task,et al.  Measuring Observers' Visual Acuity Through Night Vision Goggles , 1998 .

[13]  Jian Bi,et al.  SENSORY THRESHOLDS: CONCEPTS AND METHODS , 1998 .

[14]  Richard P. Speck,et al.  Impact of automatic calibration techniques on HMD life cycle costs and sustainable performance , 2000, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[15]  J P Rolland,et al.  Engineering of head-mounted projective displays. , 2000, Applied optics.

[16]  C Kaernbach,et al.  Slope bias of psychometric functions derived from adaptive data , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  Randall W. Gibb,et al.  On the Psychophysics of Night Vision Goggles , 2001 .

[18]  Y. Rogers,et al.  Interaction Design , 2002 .

[19]  Sri Hastuti Kurniawan,et al.  Review of Interaction design , 2003 .

[20]  Hong Hua,et al.  Design of an ultralight and compact projection lens. , 2003, Applied optics.

[21]  Larry S. Davis,et al.  Enabling a Continuum of Virtual Environment Experiences , 2003, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[22]  Jannick P. Rolland,et al.  Quantitative assessment of visual acuity in projective head-mounted displays , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[23]  Frank Biocca,et al.  Teleportal Augmented Reality System: Integrating Virtual Objects, Remote Collaborators, and Physical Reality for Distributed Networked Manufacturing , 2004 .

[24]  Frank Biocca,et al.  Development of Head-Mounted Projection Displays for Distributed, Collaborative, Augmented Reality Applications , 2005, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.