The role of feature-based attention in visual serial dependence

Perceptual decisions about current sensory input are biased towards input of the recent past – a phenomenon termed serial dependence. Serial dependence may serve to stabilize neural representations in the face of external and internal noise. However, it is unclear under which circumstances previous input attracts subsequent perceptual decisions, and thus, whether serial dependence reflects a broad smoothing or selective stabilization operation. Here, we investigated whether focusing attention on particular features of the previous stimulus modulates serial dependence. We found an attractive bias in orientation estimations when previous and current stimuli had similar orientations, and a repulsive bias when they had dissimilar orientations. The attractive bias was markedly reduced when observers attended to the size, rather than the orientation, of the previous stimulus. Conversely, the repulsive bias for stimuli with large orientation differences was not modulated by feature-based attention. This suggests separate sources of these positive and negative perceptual biases.

[1]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  Joonkoo Park,et al.  Serial dependence in numerosity perception , 2018, Journal of vision.

[3]  Joonkoo Park,et al.  Attractive Serial Dependence in the Absence of an Explicit Task , 2018, Psychological science.

[4]  D. Burr,et al.  Compressive mapping of number to space reflects dynamic encoding mechanisms, not static logarithmic transform , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  The reference frame of the tilt aftereffect. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[7]  M. Webster Visual Adaptation. , 2015, Annual review of vision science.

[8]  Martin Rolfs,et al.  Adaptive deployment of spatial and feature-based attention before saccades , 2013, Vision Research.

[9]  Kristjan Kalm,et al.  Visual recency bias is explained by a mixture model of internal representations. , 2018, Journal of vision.

[10]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  TO SEE OR NOT TO SEE: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes , 1997 .

[11]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Spatial Frequency Selectivity of a Visual Tilt Illusion , 1973, Nature.

[12]  Leonardo Chelazzi,et al.  Laws of concatenated perception: Vision goes for novelty, decisions for perseverance , 2017, bioRxiv.

[13]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Selective visual attention modulates the direct tilt aftereffect , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  N. Wade,et al.  The influence of colour and contour rivalry on the magnitude of the tilt after-effect , 1978, Vision Research.

[15]  P. Wiffen Change blindness , 2018, European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice.

[16]  Charalampos Papadimitriou,et al.  Ghosts in the Machine II: Neural Correlates of Memory Interference from the Previous Trial , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  D. Whitney,et al.  Serial Dependence in the Perception of Faces , 2014, Current Biology.

[18]  Kyriaki Mikellidou,et al.  The functional role of serial dependence , 2018, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

[19]  Francis Tuerlinckx,et al.  Increasing Transparency Through a Multiverse Analysis , 2016, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[20]  Warrick Roseboom,et al.  Serial dependence in the perception of visual variance , 2018, Journal of vision.

[21]  J. Kaiser,et al.  Two types of serial dependence in visual working memory. , 2018, British journal of psychology.

[22]  F. D. Lange,et al.  Opposite Effects of Recent History on Perception and Decision , 2017, Current Biology.

[23]  D. Whitney,et al.  Serial dependence in visual perception , 2011 .

[24]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness , 1996, Nature.

[25]  Daniel P. Bliss,et al.  Serial dependence is absent at the time of perception but increases in visual working memory , 2017, bioRxiv.

[26]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[27]  Ralph Weidner,et al.  Attention modulates visual size adaptation. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[28]  Daniel P. Bliss,et al.  Serial Dependence across Perception, Attention, and Memory , 2017, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  D. Whitney,et al.  Serial dependence in position occurs at the time of perception , 2018, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[30]  D. Whitney,et al.  Serial dependence promotes the stability of perceived emotional expression depending on face similarity , 2018, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[31]  B. Postle,et al.  Confidence boosts serial dependence in orientation estimation , 2018, bioRxiv.

[32]  Janneke F. M. Jehee,et al.  Attention Improves Encoding of Task-Relevant Features in the Human Visual Cortex , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  David Whitney,et al.  Facilitating Stable Representations: Serial Dependence in Vision , 2011, PloS one.

[34]  D. Burr,et al.  Vision: Efficient Adaptive Coding , 2014, Current Biology.

[35]  J. Atick,et al.  STATISTICS OF NATURAL TIME-VARYING IMAGES , 1995 .

[36]  Kyriaki Mikellidou,et al.  Serial dependencies act directly on perception. , 2017, Journal of vision.

[37]  J. Movshon,et al.  Neuronal Adaptation to Visual Motion in Area MT of the Macaque , 2003, Neuron.

[38]  Kazushi Maruya,et al.  Adaptation to invisible motion results in low-level but not high-level aftereffects. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[39]  J. Gibson,et al.  Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies , 1937 .

[40]  David Whitney,et al.  Serial dependence in the perception of attractiveness , 2015, Journal of vision.