Influence of tip wear of piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers on root surface roughness at different working parameters. A profilometric and atomic force microscopy study.

Roughness on tooth surfaces is reported to facilitate the reestablishment of microbial dental plaque. Hence, the main goal of dental scaling is to remove bacterial plaque and obtain smoother tooth surfaces. This study was aimed to assess the influence of tip wear of ultrasonic scaler inserts on root surface roughness at different working parameters. Twenty piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler inserts (10 worn/10 new) were selected to examine the erosion ratio (ER) on the scaler tips and to assess the influence of tip wear on root surface roughness. Erosion on the tip surfaces was evaluated under atomic force microscopy (AFM). Root samples were prepared and instrumented by new (Group I) and worn (Group II) inserts at different working parameters. Roughness change (Rc) on root surfaces after instrumentation was examined under profilometer and compared between and within the groups. Statistically significant differences were found between the mean ERs of new and worn tips (P < 0.01). The results of this study showed that tip angulation and instrument power strongly influenced the Rc values on instrumented samples (P < 0.05). It was also revealed that tip wear influenced the Rc values on root surfaces especially at 45° tip angulation (P < 0.05). Therefore, tip wear should also be considered as much as the other parameters to minimize the surface roughness during ultrasonic treatment.

[1]  A. Jenei,et al.  An atomic force microscopy study on the effect of bleaching agents on enamel surface. , 1999, Journal of dentistry.

[2]  Antonio Henrique Alves Pereira,et al.  Ultrasonic Dental Scaler Performance Assessment with an Innovative Cavitometer , 2010 .

[3]  R Hickel,et al.  The effect of working parameters on root substance removal using a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler in vitro. , 1998, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[4]  K. Selvig,et al.  Influence of tooth instrumentation roughness on subgingival microbial colonization. , 1994, Journal of periodontology.

[5]  S. C. Lea,et al.  Ultrasonic Scaler Oscillations and Tooth-surface Defects , 2009, Journal of dental research.

[6]  R. Prioli,et al.  Real-time atomic force microscopy of root dentine during demineralization when subjected to chelating agents. , 2006, International endodontic journal.

[7]  M. Beuchat,et al.  A comparative in vitro study of a magnetostrictive and a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaling instrument. , 2001, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[8]  T. Arabacı,et al.  Sonic and ultrasonic scalers in periodontal treatment: a review. , 2007, International journal of dental hygiene.

[9]  F. Watari In situ quantitative analysis of etching process of human teeth by atomic force microscopy. , 2005, Journal of electron microscopy.

[10]  T. Kocher,et al.  Methodology of three-dimensional determination of root surface roughness. , 2002, Journal of periodontal research.

[11]  W R Laird,et al.  Displacement amplitude as a measure of the acoustic output of ultrasonic scalers. , 1986, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[12]  M. Kishida,et al.  A comparison of root surface instrumentation using two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers and a hand scaler in vivo. , 2007, Journal of periodontal research.

[13]  E. Quartarone,et al.  Surface kinetic roughening caused by dental erosion: An atomic force microscopy study , 2008 .

[14]  C. Rahiotis,et al.  Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter , 2007, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[15]  S. Ebisu,et al.  Effect of surface roughness of porcelain on adhesion of bacteria and their synthesizing glucans. , 2000, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[16]  Gabriel Landini,et al.  Three-dimensional analyses of ultrasonic scaler oscillations. , 2009, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[17]  S. C. Lea,et al.  Displacement amplitude of ultrasonic scaler inserts. , 2003, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[18]  S. C. Lea,et al.  The effect of wear on ultrasonic scaler tip displacement amplitude. , 2006, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[19]  R. Bains,et al.  Application of ultrasound in periodontics: Part II , 2008, Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology.

[20]  R. Hickel,et al.  Influence of parameters on root surface roughness following treatment with a magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler: an in vitro study. , 2004, Journal of periodontology.

[21]  R Hickel,et al.  Working parameters of a magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler influencing root substance removal in vitro. , 1998, Journal of periodontology.

[22]  Margareth Oda,et al.  Surface roughness in ceramics with different finishing techniques using atomic force microscope and profilometer. , 2006, Operative dentistry.

[23]  P K Hansma,et al.  Atomic force microscopy for high-resolution imaging in cell biology. , 1992, Trends in cell biology.

[24]  G. Romanos,et al.  Effects of Er:YAG laser compared to ultrasonic scaler in periodontal treatment: a 2-year follow-up split-mouth clinical study. , 2007, Journal of periodontology.

[25]  K. Leknes,et al.  The influence of anatomic and iatrogenic root surface characteristics on bacterial colonization and periodontal destruction: a review. , 1997, Journal of periodontology.

[26]  C. Gerber,et al.  Surface Studies by Scanning Tunneling Microscopy , 1982 .

[27]  David C. King,et al.  Scanning laser vibrometry and luminol photomicrography to map cavitational activity around ultrasonic scalers , 2008, International Conference on Vibration Measurements by Laser Techniques: Advances and Applications.

[28]  Kyriakos Porfyrakis,et al.  How Surface Topography Relates to Materials' Properties , 2002, Science.

[29]  P. Hansma,et al.  An atomic-resolution atomic-force microscope implemented using an optical lever , 1989 .

[30]  G. Landini,et al.  Effect of loading on the vibration characteristics of thin magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler inserts. , 2003, Journal of periodontology.

[31]  Koichi Ito,et al.  Effects of a new ultrasonic scaler on fibroblast attachment to root surfaces: a scanning electron microscopy analysis. , 2004, Journal of periodontal research.

[32]  T. Arabacı,et al.  The comparison of the effects of three types of piezoelectric ultrasonic tips and air polishing system on the filling materials: an in vitro study. , 2007, International journal of dental hygiene.

[33]  R. Hickel,et al.  Working parameters of a sonic scaler influencing root substance removal in vitro , 1997, Clinical Oral Investigations.