Network constraints on learnability of probabilistic motor sequences

Human learners are adept at grasping the complex relationships underlying incoming sequential input1. In the present work, we formalize complex relationships as graph structures2 derived from temporal associations3,4 in motor sequences. Next, we explore the extent to which learners are sensitive to key variations in the topological properties5 inherent to those graph structures. Participants performed a probabilistic motor sequence task in which the order of button presses was determined by the traversal of graphs with modular, lattice-like or random organization. Graph nodes each represented a unique button press, and edges represented a transition between button presses. The results indicate that learning, indexed here by participants’ response times, was strongly mediated by the graph’s mesoscale organization, with modular graphs being associated with shorter response times than random and lattice graphs. Moreover, variations in a node’s number of connections (degree) and a node’s role in mediating long-distance communication (betweenness centrality) impacted graph learning, even after accounting for the level of practice on that node. These results demonstrate that the graph architecture underlying temporal sequences of stimuli fundamentally constrains learning, and moreover that tools from network science provide a valuable framework for assessing how learners encode complex, temporally structured information.Kahn et al. show that learners capitalize on higher-order topological properties when they learn a probabilistic motor sequence based on a network traversal.

[1]  D. R. Shier,et al.  Graph-Theoretic Analysis of Finite Markov Chains , 2003 .

[2]  M E J Newman,et al.  Community structure in social and biological networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Learning the structure of event sequences. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  M. Newman Complex Systems: A Survey , 2011, 1112.1440.

[5]  Eric Soetens,et al.  Perceptual or motor learning in SRT tasks with complex sequence structures , 2006, Psychological research.

[6]  E. Robertson The Serial Reaction Time Task: Implicit Motor Skill Learning? , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  John Shawe-Taylor,et al.  Neural prediction of higher-order auditory sequence statistics , 2011, NeuroImage.

[8]  R N Aslin,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996, Science.

[9]  B. Scholl,et al.  The Automaticity of Visual Statistical Learning Statistical Learning , 2005 .

[10]  A. F. Adams,et al.  The Survey , 2021, Dyslexia in Higher Education.

[11]  R. Aslin,et al.  Statistical learning of higher-order temporal structure from visual shape sequences. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  Sharon L. Thompson-Schill,et al.  Local Patterns to Global Architectures: Influences of Network Topology on Human Learning Relating Two Approaches Complex Networks Are Pervasive Network Topology Influences Learning and Memory Local Statistics Underpin Network Architecture , 2022 .

[13]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  Random Graphs , 1985 .

[14]  E. Newport,et al.  Science Current Directions in Psychological Statistical Learning : from Acquiring Specific Items to Forming General Rules on Behalf Of: Association for Psychological Science , 2022 .

[15]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Implicit learning: news from the front , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  R. Aslin,et al.  Statistical learning in a serial reaction time task: access to separable statistical cues by individual learners. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  Pablo M. Gleiser,et al.  Community Structure in Jazz , 2003, Adv. Complex Syst..

[18]  M. Newman Resource Letter CS-1: Complex Systems , 2011 .

[19]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Quantifying social group evolution , 2007, Nature.

[20]  Michael S. Vitevitch,et al.  The influence of clustering coefficient on word-learning: how groups of similar sounding words facilitate acquisition , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[21]  Douglas R. Shier,et al.  Applied Mathematical Modeling : A Multidisciplinary Approach , 1999 .

[22]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[23]  Elisabeth A. Karuza,et al.  On-line Measures of Prediction in a Self-Paced Statistical Learning Task , 2014, CogSci.

[24]  Robert M. Gonyea,et al.  Learning at a Distance : , 2009 .

[25]  S. Gerber,et al.  Unsupervised Natural Experience Rapidly Alters Invariant Object Representation in Visual Cortex , 2008 .

[26]  R. Gómez Variability and Detection of Invariant Structure , 2002, Psychological science.

[27]  Danielle S Bassett,et al.  Process reveals structure: How a network is traversed mediates expectations about its architecture , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[28]  Nachshon Meiran,et al.  Nonintentional task set activation: Evidence from implicit task sequence learning , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  Richard N. Aslin,et al.  Changing Structures in Midstream: Learning Along the Statistical Garden Path , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[30]  Raymond J Dolan,et al.  A map of abstract relational knowledge in the human hippocampal–entorhinal cortex , 2017, eLife.

[31]  M E J Newman,et al.  Modularity and community structure in networks. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  B. Rossion,et al.  Fixation Patterns During Recognition of Personally Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[33]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[34]  Mary M. Conte,et al.  Variance predicts salience in central sensory processing , 2014, eLife.

[35]  Janice Burton,et al.  News from the front. , 2004, Dental assistant.

[36]  Elger L. Abrahamse,et al.  Cognitive Processing in New and Practiced Discrete Keying Sequences , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[37]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  of Experimental Psychology : Learning , Memory , and Cognition , 2019 .

[38]  M. Vitevitch What can graph theory tell us about word learning and lexical retrieval? , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[39]  Danielle S Bassett,et al.  Individual Differences in Learning Social and Nonsocial Network Structures , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[40]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  The power law repealed: The case for an exponential law of practice , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[41]  Stephen B. Johnson,et al.  Graph theoretic modeling of large-scale semantic networks , 2006, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[42]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  Random Graphs: Notation , 2001 .

[43]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  The Large-Scale Structure of Semantic Networks: Statistical Analyses and a Model of Semantic Growth , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[44]  E. Newport,et al.  Learning at a distance I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[45]  Andrea M Philipp,et al.  Control and interference in task switching--a review. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[46]  I Koch,et al.  Automatic and intentional activation of task sets. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[47]  L. Squire,et al.  Neuronal representations of stimulus associations develop in the temporal lobe during learning , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  Jean-Baptiste Mouret,et al.  The Evolutionary Origins of Hierarchy , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[49]  Darryl W. Schneider,et al.  Hierarchical control of cognitive processes: switching tasks in sequences. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[50]  A. Reber Implicit learning of artificial grammars , 1967 .

[51]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Neural representations of events arise from temporal community structure , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.