On the intrinsic transient capability and limitations of solid oxide fuel cell systems

Abstract The intrinsic transient performance capability and limitation of integrated solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) systems is evaluated based on the system balance-of-plant response and fuel cell operating requirements (i.e., allowable deviation from nominal operation). Specifically, non-dimensional relations are derived from conservation principles that quantify the maximum instantaneous current increase that a solid oxide fuel cell system can safely manage based on (1) the desired fuel cell operating point, (2) the maximum allowable fuel utilization, (3) the maximum average fuel cell temperature deviation, (4) the response delay and (5) the operating requirements of the system balance-of-plant components. New non-dimensional numbers representing the ratio of species or thermal convection to volumetric capacitance in the fuel cell during balance-of-plant delay have been developed. The analyses indicate: (1) SOFC intrinsic transient performance is largely limited by fuel processor flow delays that can cause fuel depletion in the anode compartment and (2) that with proper system actuators and control design transient operation of SOFC systems should be possible while maintaining SOFC average temperature within a degree. The SOFC system fuel processor lag appears to be the cause of SOFC load following limitation, while lag in air handling appears to be manageable. To demonstrate methods to avoid fuel depletion limitation a fuel flow lead compensator is developed. Integrated system simulations with proper control demonstrate significant SOFC transient performance within fuel cell operating requirements.

[1]  J. P. Strakey,et al.  U.S. DOE fossil energy fuel cells program , 2006 .

[2]  Lars Imsland,et al.  Control strategy for a solid oxide fuel cell and gas turbine hybrid system , 2006 .

[3]  Faryar Jabbari,et al.  Novel solid oxide fuel cell system controller for rapid load following , 2007 .

[4]  Jack Brouwer,et al.  Control design of an atmospheric solid oxide fuel cell/gas turbine hybrid system: Variable versus fixed speed gas turbine operation , 2006 .

[5]  Fabian Mueller,et al.  On control concepts to prevent fuel starvation in solid oxide fuel cells , 2008 .

[6]  Fabian Mueller,et al.  Dynamic Simulation of an Integrated Solid Oxide Fuel Cell System Including Current-Based Fuel Flow Control , 2005 .

[7]  Mark C. Williams,et al.  U.S. distributed generation fuel cell program , 2004 .

[8]  Bjarne A. Foss,et al.  Modeling and control of a SOFC-GT-based autonomous power system , 2007 .

[9]  A. Nakajo,et al.  Modeling of thermal stresses and probability of survival of tubular SOFC , 2006 .

[10]  Anna G. Stefanopoulou,et al.  Control of Fuel Cell Power Systems: Principles, Modeling, Analysis and Feedback Design , 2004 .

[11]  Comas Haynes,et al.  Simulating process settings for unslaved SOFC response to increases in load demand , 2002 .

[12]  J. Mathiak,et al.  Dynamics of H2 production by steam reforming , 2004 .

[13]  Y. Inui,et al.  Analytical investigation on cell temperature control method of planar solid oxide fuel cell , 2006 .

[14]  Fabian Mueller,et al.  Linear Quadratic Regulator for a Bottoming Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Gas Turbine Hybrid System , 2009 .

[15]  J. P. Strakey,et al.  Solid oxide fuel cell technology development in the U.S. , 2006 .

[16]  Fabian Mueller,et al.  Synergistic integration of a gas turbine and solid oxide fuel cell for improved transient capability , 2008 .

[17]  G. S. Samuelsen,et al.  Power and temperature control of fluctuating biomass gas fueled solid oxide fuel cell and micro gas turbine hybrid system , 2006 .

[18]  Rory A. Roberts,et al.  Control Design for a Bottoming Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Gas Turbine Hybrid System , 2006 .