Traditionally taught students learn; actively engaged students remember
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Richard Catrambone,et al. A Tale of Two Curricula: The performance of two thousand students in introductory electromagnetism , 2009, 0906.0022.
[2] Eleanor C. Sayre,et al. What happens between pre- and post-tests: Multiple measurements of student understanding during an introductory physics course , 2010 .
[3] Fluctuations in Student Understanding of Newton's 3rd Law , 2010, 1009.0260.
[4] M. Bouton. Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.
[5] B. Underwood,et al. Critical issues in interference theory , 1973, Memory & cognition.
[6] G. Semb,et al. Long-term memory for knowledge learned in school. , 1993 .
[7] R. Hake. Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .
[8] A. Lawson. Using the learning cycle to teach biology concepts and reasoning patterns , 2001 .
[9] Eleanor C. Sayre,et al. Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) of students’ understanding of vector subtraction , 2010 .
[10] Andrew F. Heckler,et al. Evolution of Student Knowledge in a Traditional Introductory Classroom , 2008 .
[11] Scott Franklin,et al. Learning, retention, and forgetting of Newton’s third law throughout university physics , 2012 .
[12] Ronald K. Thornton,et al. Assessing student learning of Newton’s laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula , 1998 .
[13] David E. Meltzer,et al. Resource Letter ALIP-1: Active-Learning Instruction in Physics , 2012 .
[14] Robert J. Beichner,et al. Introduction to SCALE-UP: Student-Centered Activities for Large Enrollment University Physics. , 2000 .
[15] Peaks and decays of student knowledge in an introductory E&M course , 2009 .