Traditionally taught students learn; actively engaged students remember

A common narrative in physics education research is that students taught in lecture-based classes learn less than those taught with activity-based reformed methods. We show this narrative is simplistic and misses important dynamics of student learning. In particular, we find students of both methods show equal short-term learning gains on a conceptual question dealing with electric potential. For traditionally taught students, this learning rapidly decays on a time scale of weeks, vanishing by the time of the typical end-of-term post-test. For students in reform-based classes, however, the knowledge is retained and may even be enhanced by subsequent instruction. This difference explains the many previous pre- and post-test studies that have found minimal learning gains in lecture-based courses. Our findings suggest a more nuanced model of student learning, one that is sensitive to time-dependent effects such as forgetting and interference. In addition, the findings suggest that lecture-based courses, by i...

[1]  Richard Catrambone,et al.  A Tale of Two Curricula: The performance of two thousand students in introductory electromagnetism , 2009, 0906.0022.

[2]  Eleanor C. Sayre,et al.  What happens between pre- and post-tests: Multiple measurements of student understanding during an introductory physics course , 2010 .

[3]  Fluctuations in Student Understanding of Newton's 3rd Law , 2010, 1009.0260.

[4]  M. Bouton Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  B. Underwood,et al.  Critical issues in interference theory , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[6]  G. Semb,et al.  Long-term memory for knowledge learned in school. , 1993 .

[7]  R. Hake Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .

[8]  A. Lawson Using the learning cycle to teach biology concepts and reasoning patterns , 2001 .

[9]  Eleanor C. Sayre,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) of students’ understanding of vector subtraction , 2010 .

[10]  Andrew F. Heckler,et al.  Evolution of Student Knowledge in a Traditional Introductory Classroom , 2008 .

[11]  Scott Franklin,et al.  Learning, retention, and forgetting of Newton’s third law throughout university physics , 2012 .

[12]  Ronald K. Thornton,et al.  Assessing student learning of Newton’s laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula , 1998 .

[13]  David E. Meltzer,et al.  Resource Letter ALIP-1: Active-Learning Instruction in Physics , 2012 .

[14]  Robert J. Beichner,et al.  Introduction to SCALE-UP: Student-Centered Activities for Large Enrollment University Physics. , 2000 .

[15]  Peaks and decays of student knowledge in an introductory E&M course , 2009 .