Innovation ambidexterity and public innovation Intermediaries: The mediating role of capabilities
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Ralf Wilden,et al. Innovation intermediaries as collaborators in shaping service ecosystems: The importance of dynamic capabilities , 2022, Industrial Marketing Management.
[2] P. Ritala,et al. Orchestrating Knowledge Networks: Alter-Oriented Brokering , 2022, Journal of Management.
[3] M. Russo,et al. New business models for public innovation intermediaries supporting emerging innovation systems: The case of the Internet of Things , 2021, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
[4] L. Ardito,et al. The influence of inbound open innovation on ambidexterity performance: Does it pay to source knowledge from supply chain stakeholders? , 2020 .
[5] Jizhen Li,et al. Reconciling the Dilemma of Knowledge Sharing: A Network Pluralism Framework of Firms’ R&D Alliance Network and Innovation Performance , 2019 .
[6] M. Feldman,et al. New developments in innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystems , 2019, Industrial and Corporate Change.
[7] V. Lu,et al. Effective sense-and-respond strategies: Mediating roles of exploratory and exploitative innovation , 2017, Journal of Business Research.
[8] Yadong Luo,et al. Achieving Temporal Ambidexterity in New Ventures , 2018, Journal of Management Studies.
[9] M. Meyer,et al. Towards New Triple Helix Organisations? A Comparative Study of Competence Centres as Knowledge, Consensus and Innovation Spaces , 2018, R&D Management.
[10] Sebastian Raisch,et al. Dynamic Balancing of Exploration and Exploitation: The Contingent Benefits of Ambidexterity , 2018, Organ. Sci..
[11] Martin Meyer,et al. Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: Knowledge–based practices and internal value creation , 2018 .
[12] M. Landoni. Innovation Policy in Progress. Institutional Intermediation in Public Procurement of Innovation: Satellite Telecommunications in Italy , 2017 .
[13] Ann-Kristin Zobel,et al. Benefiting from Open Innovation: A Multidimensional Model of Absorptive Capacity * , 2017 .
[14] M. Srivastava,et al. When do relational resources matter? Leveraging portfolio technological resources for breakthrough innovation , 2011, IEEE Engineering Management Review.
[15] Paula Kivimaa,et al. Innovation, low energy buildings and intermediaries in Europe: systematic case study review , 2017 .
[16] Marian Garcia Martinez,et al. Capturing value from alliance portfolio diversity: The mediating role of R&D human capital in high and low tech industries , 2017 .
[17] A. M. Walker. Tacit knowledge , 2017, European Journal of Epidemiology.
[18] Rangapriya Kannan-Narasimhan,et al. Whom Should We Talk to? Investigating the Varying Roles of Internal and External Relationship Quality on Radical and Incremental Innovation Performance , 2016 .
[19] Andreas Bausch,et al. How Do Transformational Leaders Promote Exploratory and Exploitative Innovation? Examining the Black Box through MASEM† , 2016 .
[20] Zaheer Khan,et al. Global networks as a mode of balance for exploratory innovations in a late liberalizing economy , 2016 .
[21] Ana Pérez-Luño,et al. Coping with Diversity in Alliances for Innovation: The Role of Relational Social Capital and Knowledge Codifiability , 2016 .
[22] Muammer Ozer,et al. The effects of geographic and network ties on exploitative and exploratory product innovation , 2015 .
[23] G. M. Castro,et al. Knowledge management and innovation in knowledge-based and high-tech industrial markets: The role of openness and absorptive capacity , 2015 .
[24] Zaheer Khan,et al. International Joint Ventures as Boundary Spanners: Technological Knowledge Transfer in an Emerging Economy , 2015 .
[25] Shantanu Dutta,et al. Benefiting From Alliance Portfolio Diversity , 2014 .
[26] Mirjam Knockaert,et al. Under Which Conditions Do Technology Intermediaries Enhance Firms' Innovation Speed? The Case of Belgium's Collective Research Centres , 2014 .
[27] N. Ellis,et al. Managerial perceptions of service-infused IORs in China & India: A discursive view of value co-creation , 2014 .
[28] J. Fletcher,et al. Using Structural Equation Modeling to Assess Functional Connectivity in the Brain , 2014, Educational and psychological measurement.
[29] Ann Majchrzak,et al. Towards an Information Systems Perspective and Research Agenda on Crowdsourcing for Innovation , 2013, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..
[30] H. Walker,et al. Collaborative Procurement: A Relational View of Buyer–Buyer Relationships , 2013 .
[31] Nina Rosenbusch,et al. Success Patterns of Exploratory and Exploitative Innovation , 2013 .
[32] S. Zahra,et al. The Role of External Knowledge Sources and Organizational Design in the Process of Opportunity Exploitation , 2013 .
[33] Edward F. McDonough,et al. Managing the Exploitation/Exploration Paradox: The Role of a Learning Capability and Innovation Ambidexterity , 2013 .
[34] E. Autio. INFORMATION EXPOSURE, OPPORTUNITY EVALUATION, AND ENTREPRENEURIAL ACTION: AN INVESTIGATION OF AN ONLINE USER COMMUNITY , 2013 .
[35] N. Arranz,et al. Effect of Formal Contracts, Relational Norms and Trust on Performance of Joint Research and Development Projects , 2012 .
[36] Matthias Kramer,et al. Patent-based investment funds as innovation intermediaries for SMEs: In-depth analysis of reciprocal interactions, motives and fallacies , 2012 .
[37] Changsu Kim,et al. Learning and innovation: Exploitation and exploration trade-offs☆ , 2012 .
[38] T. Tomczak,et al. Strategic Orientation and Product Innovation: Exploring a Decompositional Approach , 2012 .
[39] Nina Rosenbusch,et al. The Mediating Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation in the Task Environment–Performance Relationship , 2011 .
[40] Toke Reichstein,et al. Organizing for External Knowledge Sourcing , 2011 .
[41] Lars Håkanson,et al. InnovationXchange: A case study in innovation intermediation , 2011 .
[42] Stefan Kuhlmann,et al. Demand articulation in emerging technologies: Intermediary user organisations as co-producers? , 2011 .
[43] D. Gann,et al. How open is innovation , 2010 .
[44] O. Gassmann,et al. The Future of Open Innovation , 2010 .
[45] M. Tushman,et al. Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Organizations , 2010 .
[46] S. Zeng,et al. Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs , 2010 .
[47] Siobhan O’Mahony,et al. Nexus Work: Brokerage on Creative Projects , 2010 .
[48] I. Barreto. Dynamic Capabilities: A Review of Past Research and an Agenda for the Future , 2010 .
[49] C. E. Hull,et al. Learning Capability, Technological Parity, and Innovation Mode Use , 2010 .
[50] Haiyang Li,et al. Innovation search of new ventures in a technology cluster: the role of ties with service intermediaries , 2010 .
[51] Qing Cao,et al. Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects , 2009, Organ. Sci..
[52] Julian Birkinshaw,et al. Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance , 2009, Organ. Sci..
[53] A. Salter,et al. Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration , 2009 .
[54] Zeki Simsek,et al. A Typology for Aligning Organizational Ambidexterity's Conceptualizations, Antecedents, and Outcomes , 2009 .
[55] Zeki Simsek. Organizational Ambidexterity: Towards a Multilevel Understanding , 2009 .
[56] Ranjay Gulati,et al. Renewal Through Reorganization: The Value of Inconsistencies between Formal and Informal Organization , 2009, Organ. Sci..
[57] Michael Song,et al. The role of suppliers in market intelligence gathering for radical and incremental innovation , 2009 .
[58] M. Hoegl,et al. Organizational knowledge creation and the generation of new product ideas: A behavioral approach , 2008 .
[59] E. B. Acworth,et al. University–industry engagement: The formation of the Knowledge Integration Community (KIC) model at the Cambridge-MIT Institute , 2008 .
[60] Kristopher J Preacher,et al. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.
[61] Laurens Klerkx,et al. Balancing multiple interests: embedding innovation intermediation in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure , 2008 .
[62] J. Birkinshaw,et al. Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators , 2008 .
[63] A. Tiwana. Do bridging ties complement strong ties? An empirical examination of alliance ambidexterity , 2008 .
[64] Josep Bisbe,et al. Defining management accounting constructs: A methodological note on the risks of conceptual misspecification , 2007 .
[65] A. Edmondson,et al. METHODOLOGICAL FIT IN MANAGEMENT FIELD RESEARCH. , 2007 .
[66] Anne S. Miner,et al. Vicarious Learning from the Failures and Near-Failures of Others: Evidence from the U.S. Commercial Banking Industry , 2007 .
[67] P. Barrett. Structural equation modelling : Adjudging model fit , 2007 .
[68] D. Iacobucci,et al. A Meditation on Mediation: Evidence that Structural Equations Models Perform Better than Regressions , 2007 .
[69] M. Tushman,et al. Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator's Dilemma , 2007 .
[70] Henk W. Volberda,et al. Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation and Peformance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators , 2006, Manag. Sci..
[71] J. Howells. Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation , 2006 .
[72] Anssi Smedlund,et al. The roles of intermediaries in a regional knowledge system , 2006 .
[73] P. Downward,et al. Retroduction as mixed-methods triangulation in economic research: Reorienting economics into social science , 2006 .
[74] A. Salter,et al. Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .
[75] B. Nielsen. The role of knowledge embeddedness in the creation of synergies in strategic alliances , 2005 .
[76] Mohan Subramaniam,et al. The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities , 2005 .
[77] R. Burt. Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.
[78] Zi-Lin He,et al. Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..
[79] M. Fritsch,et al. Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and R&D cooperation , 2004 .
[80] Yannis Caloghirou,et al. Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance? , 2004 .
[81] C. Gibson,et al. THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .
[82] M. Hekkert,et al. Roles of Systemic Intermediaries in Transition Processes , 2003 .
[83] K. Atuahene–Gima,et al. The Effects of Centrifugal and Centripetal Forces on Product Development Speed and Quality: How Does Problem Solving Matter? , 2003 .
[84] Lori Rosenkopf,et al. Overcoming Local Search Through Alliances and Mobility , 2003, Manag. Sci..
[85] Mary J. Benner,et al. Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .
[86] Erwin Danneels. The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences , 2002 .
[87] Mary J. Benner,et al. Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries , 2002 .
[88] Jeffrey J. Reuer,et al. Interorganizational Routines and Performance in Strategic Alliances , 2002, Organ. Sci..
[89] S. Zahra,et al. Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .
[90] A. Nerkar,et al. Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .
[91] Rita Gunther McGrath. Exploratory Learning, Innovative Capacity, and Managerial Oversight , 2001 .
[92] G. Ahuja. Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .
[93] Jeremy Howells,et al. From Innovation Systems to Knowledge Systems , 2000 .
[94] J. Hagedoorn,et al. Learning in Dynamic Inter-Firm Networks: The Efficacy of Multiple Contacts , 2002 .
[95] Gianni Lorenzoni,et al. The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study , 1999 .
[96] Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al. The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .
[97] Andrew B. Hargadon,et al. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .
[98] R. Burt. The contingent value of social capital. , 1997 .
[99] Daniel A. Levinthal,et al. The myopia of learning , 1993 .
[100] B. Kogut,et al. Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .
[101] G. Stalk,et al. Competing on capabilities: the new rules of corporate strategy. , 1992, Harvard business review.
[102] M. Porter. Towards a dynamic theory of strategy , 1991 .
[103] Richard P. Bagozzi,et al. Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research , 1991 .
[104] J. Barney. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .
[105] Daniel A. Levinthal,et al. ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .
[106] J. Coleman,et al. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.
[107] P. M. Podsakoff,et al. Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .
[108] D. A. Kenny,et al. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.