Innovation ambidexterity and public innovation Intermediaries: The mediating role of capabilities

[1]  Ralf Wilden,et al.  Innovation intermediaries as collaborators in shaping service ecosystems: The importance of dynamic capabilities , 2022, Industrial Marketing Management.

[2]  P. Ritala,et al.  Orchestrating Knowledge Networks: Alter-Oriented Brokering , 2022, Journal of Management.

[3]  M. Russo,et al.  New business models for public innovation intermediaries supporting emerging innovation systems: The case of the Internet of Things , 2021, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[4]  L. Ardito,et al.  The influence of inbound open innovation on ambidexterity performance: Does it pay to source knowledge from supply chain stakeholders? , 2020 .

[5]  Jizhen Li,et al.  Reconciling the Dilemma of Knowledge Sharing: A Network Pluralism Framework of Firms’ R&D Alliance Network and Innovation Performance , 2019 .

[6]  M. Feldman,et al.  New developments in innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystems , 2019, Industrial and Corporate Change.

[7]  V. Lu,et al.  Effective sense-and-respond strategies: Mediating roles of exploratory and exploitative innovation , 2017, Journal of Business Research.

[8]  Yadong Luo,et al.  Achieving Temporal Ambidexterity in New Ventures , 2018, Journal of Management Studies.

[9]  M. Meyer,et al.  Towards New Triple Helix Organisations? A Comparative Study of Competence Centres as Knowledge, Consensus and Innovation Spaces , 2018, R&D Management.

[10]  Sebastian Raisch,et al.  Dynamic Balancing of Exploration and Exploitation: The Contingent Benefits of Ambidexterity , 2018, Organ. Sci..

[11]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: Knowledge–based practices and internal value creation , 2018 .

[12]  M. Landoni Innovation Policy in Progress. Institutional Intermediation in Public Procurement of Innovation: Satellite Telecommunications in Italy , 2017 .

[13]  Ann-Kristin Zobel,et al.  Benefiting from Open Innovation: A Multidimensional Model of Absorptive Capacity * , 2017 .

[14]  M. Srivastava,et al.  When do relational resources matter? Leveraging portfolio technological resources for breakthrough innovation , 2011, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[15]  Paula Kivimaa,et al.  Innovation, low energy buildings and intermediaries in Europe: systematic case study review , 2017 .

[16]  Marian Garcia Martinez,et al.  Capturing value from alliance portfolio diversity: The mediating role of R&D human capital in high and low tech industries , 2017 .

[17]  A. M. Walker Tacit knowledge , 2017, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[18]  Rangapriya Kannan-Narasimhan,et al.  Whom Should We Talk to? Investigating the Varying Roles of Internal and External Relationship Quality on Radical and Incremental Innovation Performance , 2016 .

[19]  Andreas Bausch,et al.  How Do Transformational Leaders Promote Exploratory and Exploitative Innovation? Examining the Black Box through MASEM† , 2016 .

[20]  Zaheer Khan,et al.  Global networks as a mode of balance for exploratory innovations in a late liberalizing economy , 2016 .

[21]  Ana Pérez-Luño,et al.  Coping with Diversity in Alliances for Innovation: The Role of Relational Social Capital and Knowledge Codifiability , 2016 .

[22]  Muammer Ozer,et al.  The effects of geographic and network ties on exploitative and exploratory product innovation , 2015 .

[23]  G. M. Castro,et al.  Knowledge management and innovation in knowledge-based and high-tech industrial markets: The role of openness and absorptive capacity , 2015 .

[24]  Zaheer Khan,et al.  International Joint Ventures as Boundary Spanners: Technological Knowledge Transfer in an Emerging Economy , 2015 .

[25]  Shantanu Dutta,et al.  Benefiting From Alliance Portfolio Diversity , 2014 .

[26]  Mirjam Knockaert,et al.  Under Which Conditions Do Technology Intermediaries Enhance Firms' Innovation Speed? The Case of Belgium's Collective Research Centres , 2014 .

[27]  N. Ellis,et al.  Managerial perceptions of service-infused IORs in China & India: A discursive view of value co-creation , 2014 .

[28]  J. Fletcher,et al.  Using Structural Equation Modeling to Assess Functional Connectivity in the Brain , 2014, Educational and psychological measurement.

[29]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Towards an Information Systems Perspective and Research Agenda on Crowdsourcing for Innovation , 2013, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[30]  H. Walker,et al.  Collaborative Procurement: A Relational View of Buyer–Buyer Relationships , 2013 .

[31]  Nina Rosenbusch,et al.  Success Patterns of Exploratory and Exploitative Innovation , 2013 .

[32]  S. Zahra,et al.  The Role of External Knowledge Sources and Organizational Design in the Process of Opportunity Exploitation , 2013 .

[33]  Edward F. McDonough,et al.  Managing the Exploitation/Exploration Paradox: The Role of a Learning Capability and Innovation Ambidexterity , 2013 .

[34]  E. Autio INFORMATION EXPOSURE, OPPORTUNITY EVALUATION, AND ENTREPRENEURIAL ACTION: AN INVESTIGATION OF AN ONLINE USER COMMUNITY , 2013 .

[35]  N. Arranz,et al.  Effect of Formal Contracts, Relational Norms and Trust on Performance of Joint Research and Development Projects , 2012 .

[36]  Matthias Kramer,et al.  Patent-based investment funds as innovation intermediaries for SMEs: In-depth analysis of reciprocal interactions, motives and fallacies , 2012 .

[37]  Changsu Kim,et al.  Learning and innovation: Exploitation and exploration trade-offs☆ , 2012 .

[38]  T. Tomczak,et al.  Strategic Orientation and Product Innovation: Exploring a Decompositional Approach , 2012 .

[39]  Nina Rosenbusch,et al.  The Mediating Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation in the Task Environment–Performance Relationship , 2011 .

[40]  Toke Reichstein,et al.  Organizing for External Knowledge Sourcing , 2011 .

[41]  Lars Håkanson,et al.  InnovationXchange: A case study in innovation intermediation , 2011 .

[42]  Stefan Kuhlmann,et al.  Demand articulation in emerging technologies: Intermediary user organisations as co-producers? , 2011 .

[43]  D. Gann,et al.  How open is innovation , 2010 .

[44]  O. Gassmann,et al.  The Future of Open Innovation , 2010 .

[45]  M. Tushman,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Organizations , 2010 .

[46]  S. Zeng,et al.  Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs , 2010 .

[47]  Siobhan O’Mahony,et al.  Nexus Work: Brokerage on Creative Projects , 2010 .

[48]  I. Barreto Dynamic Capabilities: A Review of Past Research and an Agenda for the Future , 2010 .

[49]  C. E. Hull,et al.  Learning Capability, Technological Parity, and Innovation Mode Use , 2010 .

[50]  Haiyang Li,et al.  Innovation search of new ventures in a technology cluster: the role of ties with service intermediaries , 2010 .

[51]  Qing Cao,et al.  Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[52]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[53]  A. Salter,et al.  Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration , 2009 .

[54]  Zeki Simsek,et al.  A Typology for Aligning Organizational Ambidexterity's Conceptualizations, Antecedents, and Outcomes , 2009 .

[55]  Zeki Simsek Organizational Ambidexterity: Towards a Multilevel Understanding , 2009 .

[56]  Ranjay Gulati,et al.  Renewal Through Reorganization: The Value of Inconsistencies between Formal and Informal Organization , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[57]  Michael Song,et al.  The role of suppliers in market intelligence gathering for radical and incremental innovation , 2009 .

[58]  M. Hoegl,et al.  Organizational knowledge creation and the generation of new product ideas: A behavioral approach , 2008 .

[59]  E. B. Acworth,et al.  University–industry engagement: The formation of the Knowledge Integration Community (KIC) model at the Cambridge-MIT Institute , 2008 .

[60]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[61]  Laurens Klerkx,et al.  Balancing multiple interests: embedding innovation intermediation in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure , 2008 .

[62]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators , 2008 .

[63]  A. Tiwana Do bridging ties complement strong ties? An empirical examination of alliance ambidexterity , 2008 .

[64]  Josep Bisbe,et al.  Defining management accounting constructs: A methodological note on the risks of conceptual misspecification , 2007 .

[65]  A. Edmondson,et al.  METHODOLOGICAL FIT IN MANAGEMENT FIELD RESEARCH. , 2007 .

[66]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  Vicarious Learning from the Failures and Near-Failures of Others: Evidence from the U.S. Commercial Banking Industry , 2007 .

[67]  P. Barrett Structural equation modelling : Adjudging model fit , 2007 .

[68]  D. Iacobucci,et al.  A Meditation on Mediation: Evidence that Structural Equations Models Perform Better than Regressions , 2007 .

[69]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator's Dilemma , 2007 .

[70]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation and Peformance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[71]  J. Howells Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation , 2006 .

[72]  Anssi Smedlund,et al.  The roles of intermediaries in a regional knowledge system , 2006 .

[73]  P. Downward,et al.  Retroduction as mixed-methods triangulation in economic research: Reorienting economics into social science , 2006 .

[74]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[75]  B. Nielsen The role of knowledge embeddedness in the creation of synergies in strategic alliances , 2005 .

[76]  Mohan Subramaniam,et al.  The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities , 2005 .

[77]  R. Burt Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[78]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[79]  M. Fritsch,et al.  Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and R&D cooperation , 2004 .

[80]  Yannis Caloghirou,et al.  Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance? , 2004 .

[81]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[82]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Roles of Systemic Intermediaries in Transition Processes , 2003 .

[83]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  The Effects of Centrifugal and Centripetal Forces on Product Development Speed and Quality: How Does Problem Solving Matter? , 2003 .

[84]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Overcoming Local Search Through Alliances and Mobility , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[85]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[86]  Erwin Danneels The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences , 2002 .

[87]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries , 2002 .

[88]  Jeffrey J. Reuer,et al.  Interorganizational Routines and Performance in Strategic Alliances , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[89]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[90]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[91]  Rita Gunther McGrath Exploratory Learning, Innovative Capacity, and Managerial Oversight , 2001 .

[92]  G. Ahuja Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[93]  Jeremy Howells,et al.  From Innovation Systems to Knowledge Systems , 2000 .

[94]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  Learning in Dynamic Inter-Firm Networks: The Efficacy of Multiple Contacts , 2002 .

[95]  Gianni Lorenzoni,et al.  The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study , 1999 .

[96]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[97]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[98]  R. Burt The contingent value of social capital. , 1997 .

[99]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[100]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[101]  G. Stalk,et al.  Competing on capabilities: the new rules of corporate strategy. , 1992, Harvard business review.

[102]  M. Porter Towards a dynamic theory of strategy , 1991 .

[103]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research , 1991 .

[104]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[105]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[106]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[107]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[108]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.