Repeatability Between Two Intermediate Sugarcane Genotype Selection Stages in Florida

Improved yield and disease resistance on sand soils are priorities of the Canal Point (CP) sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) breeding and selection program. Analyses of historical phenotypic data can provide helpful information in guiding selection strategies to meet these priorities. Correlation analysis was used to examine repeatability of phenotypic data used to advance genotypes from an unreplicated single location clonal crop test (stage II) to the subsequent stage (stage III; two replicate, four location clonal crop experiment). Correlations between data for four traits measured in stage II and the corresponding data pooled across soil types for the same genotypes in stage III varied across 23 series of the CP program. Generally, when correlations were statistically significant (P < 0.05), correlation values were low (means; theoretical recoverable sucrose (TRS) r = 0.40, cane yield r = 0.27, and economic index r = 0.23). Similar trends were evident for correlations between data from stage II and stage III on muck soil and stage II and stage III on sand soil across 10 series of the CP program. A 10% reduction in the number of genotypes advanced to stage III over that period would have meant losing only 1 and 13 genotypes that had commercial potential on muck and sand soils, respectively (n = 1278). Correlations between the phenotypic data were significant only for stage III comparisons between TRS and cane yield, which were negatively associated on either soil type. These results indicate that changes in the advancement strategy from stage II are not required as advancing approximately 135 genotypes identifies almost all genotypes with the genetic potential to yield well on muck or sand soils in stage III. Increasing genotypes in stages prior to stage III and changing crossing strategies to improve identification of disease-resistant, high-yielding genotypes for sand soils is recommended.

[1]  B. Glaz,et al.  Sugarcane Selection for Sucrose and Tonnage Using Economic Criteria1 , 2010 .

[2]  L. Castlebury,et al.  First Report of Orange Rust of Sugarcane Caused by Puccinia kuehnii in Costa Rica and Nicaragua. , 2009, Plant disease.

[3]  L. Castlebury,et al.  First Report of Puccinia kuehnii, Causal Agent of Orange Rust of Sugarcane, in Guatemala. , 2008, Plant disease.

[4]  A. Karahan,et al.  Outbreak of Ralstonia solanacearum Biovar 2 Causing Brown Rot on Potato in the Aegean Region of Turkey. , 2008, Plant disease.

[5]  Manjit S. Kang,et al.  Location Contributions Determined via GGE Biplot Analysis of Multienvironment Sugarcane Genotype‐Performance Trials , 2008 .

[6]  L. Castlebury,et al.  First Report of Puccinia kuehnii, Causal Agent of Orange Rust of Sugarcane, in the United States and Western Hemisphere. , 2008, Plant disease.

[7]  S. Edmé,et al.  Performance of exogenous sugarcane germplasm on mineral soils of Florida, USA. , 2007 .

[8]  Phillip Jackson,et al.  Breeding for improved sugar content in sugarcane , 2005 .

[9]  Barry Glaz,et al.  Genetic contribution to yield gains in the Florida sugarcane industry across 33 years , 2005 .

[10]  Phillip Jackson,et al.  Genetic relationships between attributes in sugarcane clones closely related to Saccharum spontaneum , 2004, Euphytica.

[11]  J. Bressiani,et al.  REPEATABILITY WITHIN AND BETWEEN SELECTION STAGES IN A SUGARCANE BREEDING PROGRAM , 2003 .

[12]  B. Glaz,et al.  Sugarcane Genotype Repeatability in Replicated Selection Stages and Commercial Adoption , 2002 .

[13]  J. Steven Brown,et al.  Analysis of Resource Allocation in Final Stage Sugarcane Clonal Selection , 2001 .

[14]  L. Mamet,et al.  Shortening the selection process for sugarcane , 1999, Experimental Agriculture.

[15]  B. Glaz,et al.  Use of economic criteria-for selection clones in a sugarcane breeding program , 1995 .

[16]  P. Jackson Genotype × environment interactions in sugarcane. II. Use of performance in plant cane as an indirect selection criterion for performance in ratoon crops , 1992 .

[17]  K. Gravois,et al.  Genetic Relationship between Fiber and Sugarcane Yield Components , 1992 .

[18]  F. A. Martin,et al.  Crop effects on genetic relationships among sugarcane traits , 1990 .

[19]  M. Kang,et al.  Genetic and Phenotypic Path Analyses and Heritability in Sugarcane 1 , 1983 .

[20]  J. Comstock Sugarcane rust disease. , 1983 .

[21]  J. Comstock Sugarcane Rust in Hawaii , 1982 .

[22]  J. L. Dean,et al.  Inheritance of resistance to rust in sugarcane , 1981 .

[23]  J. Miller,et al.  Selection in Six Crops of Sugarcane. I. Repeatability of Three Characters , 1975 .