How to decarbonise international shipping: Options for fuels, technologies and policies

Abstract International shipping provides 80–90% of global trade, but strict environmental regulations around NO X , SO X and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are set to cause major technological shifts. The pathway to achieving the international target of 50% GHG reduction by 2050 is unclear, but numerous promising options exist. This study provides a holistic assessment of these options and their combined potential to decarbonise international shipping, from a technology, environmental and policy perspective. Liquefied natural gas (LNG) is reaching mainstream and provides 20–30% CO 2 reductions whilst minimising SO X and other emissions. Costs are favourable, but GHG benefits are reduced by methane slip, which varies across engine types. Biofuels, hydrogen, nuclear and carbon capture and storage (CCS) could all decarbonise much further, but each faces significant barriers around their economics, resource potentials and public acceptability. Regarding efficiency measures, considerable fuel and GHG savings could be attained by slow-steaming, ship design changes and utilising renewable resources. There is clearly no single route and a multifaceted response is required for deep decarbonisation. The scale of this challenge is explored by estimating the combined decarbonisation potential of multiple options. Achieving 50% decarbonisation with LNG or electric propulsion would likely require 4 or more complementary efficiency measures to be applied simultaneously. Broadly, larger GHG reductions require stronger policy and may differentiate between short- and long-term approaches. With LNG being economically feasible and offering moderate environmental benefits, this may have short-term promise with minor policy intervention. Longer term, deeper decarbonisation will require strong financial incentives. Lowest-cost policy options should be fuel- or technology-agnostic, internationally applied and will require action now to ensure targets are met by 2050.

[1]  P. Alam ‘T’ , 2021, Composites Engineering: An A–Z Guide.

[2]  P. Alam ‘G’ , 2021, Composites Engineering: An A–Z Guide.

[3]  Francesco Baldi,et al.  A feasibility analysis of waste heat recovery systems for marine applications , 2015 .

[4]  Jomon Aliyas Paul,et al.  Slow steaming impacts on ocean carriers and shippers , 2013 .

[5]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[6]  Itf Decarbonising Maritime Transport: Pathways to zero-carbon shipping by 2035 , 2018 .

[7]  Khaled Senary,et al.  Development of a waste heat recovery system onboard LNG carrier to meet IMO regulations , 2016 .

[8]  Conor J. Walsh,et al.  Propulsive power contribution of a kite and a Flettner rotor on selected shipping routes , 2014 .

[9]  I. Wilson,et al.  Rapid fuel switching from coal to natural gas through effective carbon pricing , 2018 .

[10]  Meike Baumgart,et al.  LNG-fueled vessels in the Norwegian short-sea market : a cost-effective response to environmental regulation , 2010 .

[11]  Gerasimos Theotokatos,et al.  Techno-economical analysis of single pressure exhaust gas waste heat recovery systems in marine propulsion plants , 2013 .

[12]  Adam Hawkes,et al.  The Natural Gas Supply Chain: The Importance of Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions , 2017 .

[13]  James J. Winebrake,et al.  Third IMO GHG Study , 2015 .

[14]  Atilla Incecik,et al.  Assessing the Impact of a Slow Steaming Approach on Reducing the Fuel Consumption of a Containership Advancing in Head Seas , 2016 .

[15]  Pierre Cariou,et al.  Is slow steaming a sustainable means of reducing CO2 emissions from container shipping , 2011 .

[16]  Yubing Shi Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from international shipping: Is it time to consider market-based measures? , 2016 .

[17]  Kevin Cullinane,et al.  Emission control areas and their impact on maritime transport , 2014 .

[18]  René Taudal Poulsen,et al.  Orchestrating transnational environmental governance in maritime shipping , 2015 .

[19]  J. Wilcox,et al.  Carbon Capture , 2012 .

[20]  A. Azapagic,et al.  Carbon capture, storage and utilisation technologies: A critical analysis and comparison of their life cycle environmental impacts , 2015 .

[21]  James J. Corbett,et al.  The costs and benefits of reducing SO2 emissions from ships in the US West Coastal waters , 2007 .

[22]  Biagio Ciuffo,et al.  Estimating air emissions from ships: Meta-analysis of modelling approaches and available data sources , 2011 .

[23]  Christos A. Kontovas,et al.  Balancing the economic and environmental performance of maritime transportation , 2010 .

[24]  Iain Staffell,et al.  Electricity in Europe: exiting fossil fuels? , 2016 .

[25]  鳥居 泰彦,et al.  世界経済・社会統計 = World development indicators , 1998 .

[26]  Sarah Mander,et al.  Slow steaming and a new dawn for wind propulsion: A multi-level analysis of two low carbon shipping transitions , 2017 .

[27]  Christopher Depcik,et al.  Review of organic Rankine cycles for internal combustion engine exhaust waste heat recovery , 2013 .

[28]  P. Alam ‘O’ , 2021, Composites Engineering: An A–Z Guide.

[29]  P. Cochat,et al.  Et al , 2008, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[30]  Chun-Yang Ma,et al.  Ending the production of highly enriched uranium for naval reactors , 2001 .

[31]  I. Dincer,et al.  Clean fuel options with hydrogen for sea transportation: A life cycle approach , 2018 .

[32]  Szu Hui Ng,et al.  Uncertainty quantification of CO2 emission reduction for maritime shipping , 2016 .

[33]  Orestis Schinas,et al.  Feasibility and Commercial Considerations of LNG-Fueled Ships , 2016 .

[34]  A. Hawkes,et al.  A greener gas grid: What are the options , 2018, Energy Policy.

[35]  James J. Corbett,et al.  A STRATEGY FOR INTRODUCING HYDROGEN INTO TRANSPORTATION , 2003 .

[36]  S. Pfenninger,et al.  Using bias-corrected reanalysis to simulate current and future wind power output , 2016 .

[37]  G. Rau,et al.  CO2 mitigation via capture and chemical conversion in seawater. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[38]  M. Coyle,et al.  The atmospheric lifetime of black carbon , 2012 .

[39]  Md. Tarikul Islam,et al.  Regulating global shipping corporations' accountability for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the seas , 2016 .

[40]  Cengiz Deniz,et al.  Environmental and economical assessment of alternative marine fuels , 2016 .

[41]  Qiang Guo,et al.  Conceptual Design and Performance Analysis of an Exhaust Gas Waste Heat Recovery System for a 10000TEU Container Ship , 2012 .

[42]  Costs and benefits of LNG as ship fuel for container vessels , 2012 .

[43]  P. Dickinson,et al.  Characterization and Evaluation of Methane Oxidation Catalysts for Dual-Fuel Diesel and Natural Gas Engines , 2016, Emission Control Science and Technology.

[44]  Pavel Senovsky,et al.  LNG as a potential alternative fuel – Safety and security of storage facilities , 2011 .

[45]  Dana Lowell,et al.  Assessment of the fuel cycle impAct of liquefied nAturAl gAs As used in internAtionAl shipping , 2013 .

[46]  R. A. Halim,et al.  Decarbonization Pathways for International Maritime Transport: A Model-Based Policy Impact Assessment , 2018, Sustainability.

[47]  J. Stiglitz,et al.  United Nations Conference Ontrade and Development , 2005, International Organizations and the Law of the Sea 2002.

[48]  Alan J. Murphy,et al.  Assessment of full life-cycle air emissions of alternative shipping fuels , 2018 .

[49]  Min-Hsiung Yang,et al.  Thermodynamic and economic performances optimization of an organic Rankine cycle system utilizing exhaust gas of a large marine diesel engine , 2015 .

[50]  Gerasimos Theotokatos,et al.  Techno-economic investigation of alternative propulsion plants for Ferries and RoRo ships , 2014 .

[51]  Marjorie Doudnikoff,et al.  Effect of a speed reduction of containerships in response to higher energy costs in Sulphur Emission Control Areas , 2014 .

[52]  E. Fridell,et al.  Environmental assessment of marine fuels: liquefied natural gas, liquefied biogas, methanol and bio-methanol , 2014 .

[53]  T. Diamantino,et al.  Marine paints: The particular case of antifouling paints , 2007 .

[54]  C. Banks,et al.  Methane emission management in a dual-fuel engine exhaust using Pd and Ni hydroxyapatite catalysts , 2017 .

[55]  P Nelson,et al.  Prevention of Air Pollution from Ships , 1999 .

[56]  Y. R. Venturini,et al.  Phd , 2009, AINA.

[57]  A. Hawkes,et al.  Methane emissions: choosing the right climate metric and time horizon. , 2018, Environmental science. Processes & impacts.

[58]  Markus Amann,et al.  Analysis of Policy Measures to Reduce Ship Emissions in the Context of the Revision of the National Emissions Ceilings Directive , 2007 .

[59]  FUTURE SHIP POWERING OPTIONS Exploring alternative methods of ship propulsion July 2013 , 2013 .

[60]  Tristan W. P. Smith,et al.  Wind technologies: Opportunities and barriers to a low carbon shipping industry , 2017 .

[61]  Massimo Tavoni,et al.  Are renewable energy subsidies effective? Evidence from Europe , 2017 .

[62]  D. Shindell,et al.  Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing , 2014 .

[63]  T. Mahdi State of the Art Technologies for , 2018 .

[64]  Adam Hawkes,et al.  The future cost of electrical energy storage based on experience rates , 2017, Nature Energy.

[65]  Theo Notteboom,et al.  The Adoption of Liquefied Natural Gas as a Ship Fuel: A Systematic Review of Perspectives and Challenges , 2014 .

[66]  A. Elmarakbi,et al.  Recent progress in marine foul-release polymeric nanocomposite coatings , 2017 .

[67]  Pierre Cariou,et al.  The effectiveness of a European speed limit versus an international bunker-levy to reduce CO2 emissions from container shipping , 2012 .

[68]  P. Alam ‘S’ , 2021, Composites Engineering: An A–Z Guide.

[69]  S. Pfenninger,et al.  Long-term patterns of European PV output using 30 years of validated hourly reanalysis and satellite data , 2016 .

[70]  Y. F. Cheng,et al.  Considerations on the potential use of Nuclear Small Modular Reactor (SMR) technology for merchant marine propulsion , 2014 .

[71]  Garyfalia Nikolakaki Economic incentives for maritime shipping relating to climate protection , 2013 .

[72]  Janardan Kumar Globalisation – The Maritime Nexus , 2013 .

[73]  A. Hawkes,et al.  The carbon credentials of hydrogen gas networks and supply chains , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[74]  Chung Yee Lee,et al.  The Impact of Slow Ocean Steaming on Delivery Reliability and Fuel Consumption , 2013 .

[75]  A. Hawkes,et al.  Characterising the distribution of methane and carbon dioxide emissions from the natural gas supply chain , 2018 .

[76]  Twp Smith,et al.  Global Marine Fuel Trends 2030 , 2014 .

[77]  C. Onder,et al.  Catalytic methane oxidation in the exhaust gas aftertreatment of a lean-burn natural gas engine , 2018, Chemical Engineering Journal.

[78]  A. Stromman,et al.  State-of-the-art technologies, measures, and potential for reducing GHG emissions from shipping – A review , 2017 .

[79]  Zheng Wan,et al.  Decarbonizing the international shipping industry: Solutions and policy recommendations. , 2018, Marine pollution bulletin.

[80]  C. Raucci,et al.  Hydrogen on board ship: a first analysis of key parameters and implications , 2015 .

[81]  H. Psaraftis Market-based measures for greenhouse gas emissions from ships: a review , 2012 .

[82]  Aie,et al.  Energy Technology Perspectives 2012 , 2006 .

[83]  C. Hsieh Biofuels for the marine shipping sector , 2017 .

[84]  Bahman Shabani,et al.  Where does hydrogen fit in a sustainable energy economy , 2012 .

[85]  Twp Smith,et al.  Assessment of Shipping's Efficiency Using Satellite AIS data , 2013 .

[86]  Thierry Vanelslander,et al.  Is new emission legislation stimulating the implementation of sustainable and energy-efficient maritime technologies? , 2015 .

[87]  I. Linossier,et al.  Development of environmentally friendly antifouling paints using biodegradable polymer and lower toxic substances , 2014 .

[88]  M. Omara,et al.  Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain , 2018, Science.

[89]  Giorgio Simbolotti,et al.  Energy Technology Perspectives 2008 , 2008 .

[90]  Twp Smith,et al.  Analysis techniques for evaluating the fuel savings associated with wind assistance , 2013 .

[91]  Tristan Smith,et al.  The implementation of technical energy efficiency and CO2 emission reduction measures in shipping , 2017 .

[92]  J. A. Fernandes,et al.  Costs and benefits to European shipping of ballast-water and hull-fouling treatment: Impacts of native and non-indigenous species , 2016 .

[93]  Christos Chryssakis,et al.  CO2 abatement potential towards 2050 for shipping, including alternative fuels , 2013 .

[94]  Jacob Kronbak,et al.  The costs and benefits of sulphur reduction measures: Sulphur scrubbers versus marine gas oil , 2014 .

[95]  Hongjun Mao,et al.  Combustion process and NOx emissions of a marine auxiliary diesel engine fuelled with waste cooking oil biodiesel blends , 2018 .

[96]  R. Matthews,et al.  Carbon Impacts of Biomass Consumed in the EU: quantitative assessment , 2015 .

[97]  Robert Gross,et al.  Global bioenergy resources , 2014 .

[98]  Feng Song,et al.  Environmental efficiency, advances in environmental technology and total factor of environmental productivity of China , 2013, Kybernetes.

[99]  J. Wentworth,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Removal , 2017 .

[100]  Conor J. Walsh,et al.  Charting a low carbon future for shipping: A UK perspective , 2017 .

[101]  Nicola Paltrinieri,et al.  LNG-fuelled fishing vessels: A systems engineering approach , 2017 .

[102]  Yousri M. A. Welaya,et al.  A comparison between fuel cells and other alternatives for marine electric power generation , 2011 .

[103]  V. Eyring,et al.  Second IMO GHG study 2009 , 2009 .

[104]  P. Alam ‘E’ , 2021, Composites Engineering: An A–Z Guide.

[105]  Nicola Zuliani,et al.  Improving sustainability of maritime transport through utilization of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) for propulsion , 2013 .

[106]  A. Hawkes,et al.  Future cost and performance of water electrolysis: An expert elicitation study , 2017 .

[107]  P. Alam ‘A’ , 2021, Composites Engineering: An A–Z Guide.

[108]  Eilif Pedersen,et al.  A review of waste heat recovery technologies for maritime applications , 2016 .

[109]  B. Ciuffo,et al.  Designing a climate change policy for the international maritime transport sector: Market-based measures and technological options for global and regional policy actions , 2011 .

[110]  Ken Caldeira,et al.  Enhanced carbonate dissolution : a means of sequestering waste CO2 as ocean bicarbonate , 1999 .

[111]  K. Casey,et al.  Spatial and temporal changes in cumulative human impacts on the world's ocean , 2015, Nature Communications.

[112]  Jong-Woo Ahn,et al.  Investigation on drag performance of anti-fouling painted flat plates in a cavitation tunnel , 2015 .

[113]  G. Kadijk,et al.  Environmental and economic aspects of using LNG as a fuel for shipping in The Netherlands , 2011 .

[114]  P. Ekins,et al.  The role of hydrogen and fuel cells in the global energy system , 2019, Energy & Environmental Science.