The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms

The objective of the research was to discover the chief determinants of entrepreneurship, the process by which organizations renew themselves and their markets by pioneering, innovation, and risk taking. Some authors have argued that personality factors of the leader are what determine entrepreneurship, others have highlighted the role played by the structure of the organization, while a final group have pointed to the importance of strategy making. We believed that the manner and extent to which entrepreneurship would be influenced by all of these factors would in large measure depend upon the nature of the organization. Based upon the work of a number of authors we derived a crude typology of firms: Simple firms are small and their power is centralized at the top. Planning firms are bigger, their goal being smooth and efficient operation through the use of formal controls and plans. Organic firms strive to be adaptive to their environments, emphasizing expertise-based power and open communications. The predictiveness of the typology was established upon a sample of 52 firms using hypothesis-testing and analysis of variance techniques. We conjectured that in Simple firms entrepreneurship would be determined by the characteristics of the leader; in Planning firms it would be facilitated by explicit and well integrated product-market strategies, and in Organic firms it would be a function of environment and structure. These hypotheses were largely borne out by correlational and multiple regression analyses. Any programs which aim to stimulate entrepreneurship would benefit greatly from tailoring recommendations to the nature of the target firms.

[1]  M. K. D. Vries,et al.  Top Executive Locus of Control and Its Relationship to Strategy-Making, Structure, and Environment , 1982 .

[2]  The Sovereign State of ITT , 1981 .

[3]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Measuring And Assessing Organizations , 1980 .

[4]  W. E. Snizek,et al.  The Nature and Types of Organizational Taxonomies: An Overview , 1980 .

[5]  STRATEGY, STRUCTURE AND ENVIRONMENT: CONTEXT INFLUENCES UPON SOME BIVARIATE ASSOCIATIONS , 1979 .

[6]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structuring of Organizations , 1979 .

[7]  L'entrepreneurship au Québec , 1979 .

[8]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[9]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  Archetypes of Strategy Formulation , 1978 .

[10]  M. Tushman Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process. , 1977 .

[11]  M. K. D. Vries,et al.  THE ENTREPRENEURIAL PERSONALITY: A PERSON AT THE CROSSROADS , 1977 .

[12]  P. Nystrom,et al.  Camping on Seesaws: Prescriptions for a Self-Designing Organization , 1976 .

[13]  A. Shapero The Displaced, Uncomfortable Entrepreneur , 1975 .

[14]  E. Rogers,et al.  Communication of Innovations; A Cross-Cultural Approach. , 1974 .

[15]  Michael J. Roberts,et al.  New business ventures and the entrepreneur , 1974 .

[16]  Henry Mintzberg Strategy-Making in Three Modes , 1973 .

[17]  R. Dewar,et al.  Elite Values Versus Organizational Structure in Predicting Innovation , 1973 .

[18]  A. Cooper,et al.  Technical entrepreneurship: what do we know? , 1973 .

[19]  Lawrence A. Klatt Small business management : essentials of entrepreneurship , 1973 .

[20]  Jay R. Galbraith Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[21]  C. Perrow Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay , 1975 .

[22]  R. Normann,et al.  Organizational Innovativeness: Product Variation and Reorientation , 1971 .

[23]  L. L. Cummings,et al.  Managerial Process and Organizational Behavior. , 1970 .

[24]  Craig C. Lundberg,et al.  Social change in complex organizations , 1970 .

[25]  R. Ackoff,et al.  A Concept of Corporate Planning. , 1972 .

[26]  D. Pugh An Empirical Taxonomy of Structures of Work Organizations. , 1969 .

[27]  G. Steiner,et al.  Top Management Planning , 1969 .

[28]  W. H. Rodgers,et al.  Think; A Biography of the Watsons and IBM , 1969 .

[29]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and environment , 1967 .

[30]  F. Aguilar Scanning the business environment , 1967 .

[31]  Harvey M. Sapolsky,et al.  Organizational Structure and Innovation , 1967 .

[32]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[33]  J. Rotter Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. , 1966, Psychological monographs.

[34]  Darab B. Unwalla,et al.  The enterprising man , 1964 .

[35]  M. Crozier The Bureaucratic Phenomenon , 1964 .

[36]  William H. Read,et al.  Upward Communication in Industrial Hierarchies , 1962 .

[37]  E. Litwak,et al.  Models of Bureaucracy Which Permit Conflict , 1961, American Journal of Sociology.

[38]  Raimar Richers The theory of economic development , 1961 .

[39]  L. R. Hoffman,et al.  Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[40]  H. Hartmann Managers and Entrepreneurs: A Useful Distinction? , 1959 .

[41]  Charles Frederick Carter,et al.  Book Reviews: Industry and Technical Progress. Factors Governing the Speed of Application of Science , 1957 .

[42]  Arthur H. Cole,et al.  An Approach to the Study of Entrepreneurship: A Tribute to Edwin F. Gay , 1946, The Journal of Economic History.