A Category‐based Video Analysis of Students' Activities in an Out‐of‐school Hands‐on Gene Technology Lesson

Our research objectives focused on monitoring (i) students' activities during experimental teaching phases in an out‐of‐school gene technology laboratory, and (ii) potential relationships with variables such as work group size and cognitive achievement. Altogether, we videotaped 20 work groups of A‐level 12th graders (n = 67) by continuous recording of their laboratory‐work phases. Subsequent analysis revealed nine categories characterizing the students' most relevant activities. Intra‐observer and inter‐observer objectivity as well as reliability scores confirmed the good fit of this categorization. Based on the individual time budgets generated, we extracted four clusters derived from students' prevalent activities. A cross‐tabulation of two cluster analysis methods independently used showed a high level of agreement. Clusters were labelled as (i) “all‐rounders” (members of which applied similar portions of time to the main activities), (ii) “observers” (members dominating activity focused on in‐group observation of the laboratory work), (iii) “high‐experimenters” (members predominantly engaged in specific hands‐on activities), and (iv) “passive students” (members mainly engaged in activities with no experimental relation). Particularly, we found members of Clusters 1 and 2 in four‐person work groups while members of Clusters 3 and 4 were prevalent in three‐person groups. During the educational intervention, students of all clusters improved their cognitive achievement on a short‐term and a long‐term schedule. However, only the “all‐rounders” revealed a high level of persistent (long‐term) knowledge with no decrease rate at all. We draw conclusions with respect to work group sizes as well as to organizational aspects of experimental lessons.

[1]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. , 1968 .

[2]  Michael R. Anderberg,et al.  Cluster Analysis for Applications , 1973 .

[3]  Vincent N. Lunetta,et al.  An Analysis of Laboratory Inquiries in the BSCS Yellow Version , 1978 .

[4]  Assessing and analyzing the performance of students in college science laboratories , 1979 .

[5]  Michael R. Abraham A descriptive instrument for use in investigating science laboratories , 1982 .

[6]  M. B. Ogunniyi An analysis of laboratory activities in selected Nigerian secondary schools , 1983 .

[7]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Meta-Analysis in Education: How Has It Been Used? , 1984 .

[8]  P. Okebukola Science Laboratory Behavior Strategies of Students Relative to Performance in and Attitude to Laboratory Work. , 1985 .

[9]  T. Bryce,et al.  What can they do? A review of practical assessment in Science , 1985 .

[10]  Mike Hansell,et al.  Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide, Paul Martin, Patrick Bateson. University of Cambridge Press, Cambridge (1986), x, +200. Price £20.00 (hardback), £6.95 (paperback) , 1987 .

[11]  John P. Keeves,et al.  Educational research, methodology and measurement : an international handbook , 1988 .

[12]  Pinchas Tamir,et al.  Training Teachers to Teach Effectively in the Laboratory. , 1989 .

[13]  Maxim J. Schlossberg,et al.  Educational Research, Methodology, and Measurement: An International Handbook. , 1990 .

[14]  Robert J. Semper,et al.  Science Museums as Environments for Learning , 1990 .

[15]  Angela M. O'Donnell,et al.  Individual differences in the cooperative learning of concrete procedures , 1991 .

[16]  Sharon Reynolds,et al.  Knowledge hypermaps and cooperative learning , 1991 .

[17]  M. J. Norušis,et al.  SPSS for Windows : professional statistics, release 5 , 1992 .

[18]  Paul Martin,et al.  Measuring behaviour: An introductory guide, 2nd ed. , 1993 .

[19]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  The effect of levels of cooperation within physical science laboratory groups on physical science achievement , 1994 .

[20]  S. Sharan Handbook of Cooperative Learning Methods , 1994 .

[21]  M. Chalfie GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN , 1995, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[22]  B. Lazerick Third international mathematics and science study , 1997 .

[23]  Jeffrey D. Weld Teaching and Learning in Science. , 1997 .

[24]  Derek Hodson,et al.  Teaching and learning science : towards a personalized approach , 1998 .

[25]  Vincent N. Lunetta The School Science Laboratory: Historical Perspectives and Contexts for Contemporary Teaching , 1998 .

[26]  C. F. Bond,et al.  Individual differences in dyadic cooperative learning. , 1998 .

[27]  J. Stigler,et al.  The TIMSS Videotape Classroom Study: Methods and Findings from an Exploratory Research Project on Eighth-Grade Mathematics Instruction in Germany, Japan, and the United States. A Research and Development Report. , 1999 .

[28]  Wilfried Bos,et al.  Content analysis in empirical social research , 1999 .

[29]  R. Bullock,et al.  Effective teaching of science: a review of research , 2000 .

[30]  P. Heard,et al.  Can 'ears-on' help hands-on science learning for girls and boys? , 2000 .

[31]  Wenzel. Cooperative student activities as learning devices , 2000, Analytical chemistry.

[32]  S. Lange,et al.  Adjusting for multiple testing--when and how? , 2001, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[33]  Andreas Krapp,et al.  Structural and Dynamic Aspects of Interest Development: Theoretical Considerations from an Ontogenetic Perspective. , 2002 .

[34]  Andrée Tiberghien,et al.  Talking Physics in Labwork Contexts - A Category Based Analysis of Videotapes , 2002 .

[35]  L. Hoffmann,et al.  Promoting girls' interest and achievement in physics classes for beginners , 2002 .

[36]  C. Chinn,et al.  Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in Schools: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks , 2002 .

[37]  Deborah Allen,et al.  Approaches to cell biology teaching: cooperative learning in the science classroom--beyond students working in groups. , 2003, Cell biology education.

[38]  J. Bennett Teaching and learning science , 2003 .

[39]  Hans Niedderer,et al.  Teaching and learning in the science laboratory , 2003 .

[40]  Karen B. Givvin,et al.  Third International Mathematics and Science Study 1999 Video Study Technical Report , 2003 .

[41]  Vincent N. Lunetta,et al.  The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century , 2004 .

[42]  A. Tromans Techniques: Bright future for GFP , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[43]  Dina G Markowitz,et al.  Evaluation of the Long-Term Impact of a University High School Summer Science Program on Students' Interest and Perceived Abilities in Science , 2004 .

[44]  F. Scharfenberg Experimenteller Biologieunterricht zu Aspekten der Gentechnik im Lernort Labor: empirische Untersuchung zu Akzeptanz, Wissenserwerb und Interesse , 2005 .

[45]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Conceptual and socio-cognitive support for collaborative learning in videoconferencing environments , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[46]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom , 2006 .

[47]  Dimitrios Stamovlasis,et al.  A Study of Group Interaction Processes in Learning Lower Secondary Physics. , 2006 .

[48]  F. Bogner,et al.  Learning in a gene technology laboratory with educational focus: Results of a teaching unit with authentic experiments , 2007, Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.