Rigorous results on the effectiveness of some heuristics for the consolidation of virtual machines in a cloud data center

Dynamic consolidation of virtual machines (VMs) in a cloud data center can be used to minimize power consumption. Beloglazov et al. have proposed the MM (Minimization of Migrations) heuristic for selecting the VMs to migrate from under- or over-utilized hosts, as well as the MBFD (Modified Best Fit Decreasing) heuristic for deciding the placement of the migrated VMs. According to their simulation results, these heuristics work very well in practice. In this paper, we investigate what performance guarantees can be rigorously proven for the heuristics. In particular, we establish that MM is optimal with respect to the number of selected VMs of an over-utilized host and it is a 1.5-approximation with respect to the decrease in utilization. On the other hand, we show that the result of MBFD can be arbitrarily far from the optimum. Moreover, we show that even if both MM and MBFD deliver optimal results, their combination does not necessarily result in optimal VM consolidation, but approximation results can be proven under suitable technical conditions. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first rigorously proven results on the effectiveness of also practically useful heuristic algorithms for the VM consolidation problem. The MM heuristic is proven to be a 3/2-approximation algorithm.The result of the MBFD heuristic can be arbitrarily far from the optimum.If MM and MBFD give optimal results, then their interplay is a 2-approximation algorithm.

[1]  Daniel M. Batista,et al.  A set of schedulers for grid networks , 2007, SAC '07.

[2]  Vijay K. Naik,et al.  Biting Off Safely More Than You Can Chew: Predictive Analytics for Resource Over-Commit in IaaS Cloud , 2012, 2012 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Cloud Computing.

[3]  Rajkumar Buyya,et al.  Article in Press Future Generation Computer Systems ( ) – Future Generation Computer Systems Cloud Computing and Emerging It Platforms: Vision, Hype, and Reality for Delivering Computing as the 5th Utility , 2022 .

[4]  Thomas Stoehr.  Managing the Cost , 2002 .

[5]  Feng Zhao,et al.  Energy aware consolidation for cloud computing , 2008, CLUSTER 2008.

[6]  Rajkumar Buyya,et al.  Energy-Efficient Management of Data Center Resources for Cloud Computing: A Vision, Architectural Elements, and Open Challenges , 2010, PDPTA.

[7]  Navendu Jain,et al.  Managing cost, performance, and reliability tradeoffs for energy-aware server provisioning , 2011, 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[8]  David Breitgand,et al.  Improving consolidation of virtual machines with risk-aware bandwidth oversubscription in compute clouds , 2012, 2012 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[9]  Rajkumar Buyya,et al.  Energy-aware resource allocation heuristics for efficient management of data centers for Cloud computing , 2012, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[10]  Cosimo Anglano,et al.  Exploiting VM Migration for the Automated Power and Performance Management of Green Cloud Computing Systems , 2012, E2DC.

[11]  Aameek Singh,et al.  Coupled placement in modern data centers , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel & Distributed Processing.

[12]  Rajkumar Buyya,et al.  Energy Efficient Allocation of Virtual Machines in Cloud Data Centers , 2010, 2010 10th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing.

[13]  Daniel A. Menascé,et al.  Autonomic resource provisioning in cloud systems with availability goals , 2013, CAC.

[14]  György Dósa,et al.  The Tight Bound of First Fit Decreasing Bin-Packing Algorithm Is FFD(I) <= 11/9OPT(I) + 6/9 , 2007, ESCAPE.

[15]  Gargi Dasgupta,et al.  Server Workload Analysis for Power Minimization using Consolidation , 2009, USENIX Annual Technical Conference.

[16]  Luis Carlos Erpen De Bona,et al.  On Modelling Virtual Machine Consolidation to Pseudo-Boolean Constraints , 2012, IBERAMIA.

[17]  T. V. Lakshman,et al.  Network aware resource allocation in distributed clouds , 2012, 2012 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[18]  Brian J. Watson,et al.  Autonomic Virtual Machine Placement in the Data Center , 2008 .

[19]  Jing Xu,et al.  Multi-Objective Virtual Machine Placement in Virtualized Data Center Environments , 2010, 2010 IEEE/ACM Int'l Conference on Green Computing and Communications & Int'l Conference on Cyber, Physical and Social Computing.

[20]  Randy H. Katz,et al.  Heterogeneity and dynamicity of clouds at scale: Google trace analysis , 2012, SoCC '12.

[21]  Vanish Talwar,et al.  No "power" struggles: coordinated multi-level power management for the data center , 2008, ASPLOS.

[22]  Johan Tordsson,et al.  Virtual Machine Placement for Predictable and Time-Constrained Peak Loads , 2011, GECON.

[23]  Johan Tordsson,et al.  Policy-Driven Service Placement Optimization in Federated Clouds , 2011 .

[24]  Luiz Fernando Bittencourt,et al.  Power-aware virtual machine scheduling on clouds using active cooling control and DVFS , 2011, MGC '11.

[25]  Liang Liu,et al.  GreenCloud: a new architecture for green data center , 2009, ICAC-INDST '09.

[26]  Andrzej Kochut,et al.  Dynamic Placement of Virtual Machines for Managing SLA Violations , 2007, 2007 10th IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management.

[27]  Jirí Sgall,et al.  First Fit bin packing: A tight analysis , 2013, STACS.

[28]  Johan Tordsson,et al.  An Autonomic Approach to Risk-Aware Data Center Overbooking , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing.

[29]  Jeffrey D. Ullman,et al.  Worst-Case Performance Bounds for Simple One-Dimensional Packing Algorithms , 1974, SIAM J. Comput..

[30]  Jirí Sgall,et al.  A New Analysis of Best Fit Bin Packing , 2012, FUN.

[31]  Nagarajan Kandasamy,et al.  Power and performance management of virtualized computing environments via lookahead control , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Autonomic Computing.

[32]  T. V. Lakshman,et al.  Optimizing data access latencies in cloud systems by intelligent virtual machine placement , 2013, 2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.