Expanding Proteome Coverage with Orthogonal-specificity (cid:2) -Lytic Proteases* □ S

Bottom-up proteomics studies traditionally involve proteome digestion with a single protease, trypsin. However, trypsin alone does not generate peptides that encompass the entire proteome. Alternative proteases have been ex-plored, but most have specificity for charged amino acid side chains. Therefore, additional proteases that improve proteome coverage through cleavage at sequences complementary to trypsin’s may increase proteome coverage. We demonstrate the novel application of two proteases for bottom-up proteomics: wild type (cid:2) -lytic protease (WaLP) and an active site mutant of WaLP, M190A (cid:2) -lytic protease (MaLP). We assess several relevant factors, including MS/MS fragmentation, peptide length, peptide yield, and protease specificity. When data from separate digestions with trypsin, LysC, WaLP, and MaLP were combined, proteome coverage was increased by 101% relative to that achieved with trypsin digestion alone. To demonstrate how the gained sequence coverage can yield additional post-translational modification information, we show the identification of a number of novel phosphorylation sites in the Schizosaccharomyces pombe proteome and include an illustrative example from the protein MPD2 wherein two novel sites are identified, one in a tryptic peptide too short to identify and the other in a sequence devoid of tryptic sites. The specificity of WaLP and MaLP for aliphatic amino acid side chains was particularly valuable for coverage of membrane protein sequences, which increased 350% when the data from trypsin, LysC, WaLP, and MaLP were combined.

[1]  K. Clauser,et al.  Sequencing-grade de novo analysis of MS/MS triplets (CID/HCD/ETD) from overlapping peptides. , 2013, Journal of proteome research.

[2]  M. Mann,et al.  Proteomic workflow for analysis of archival formalin‐fixed and paraffin‐embedded clinical samples to a depth of 10 000 proteins , 2013, Proteomics. Clinical applications.

[3]  Jürgen Cox,et al.  A systematic investigation into the nature of tryptic HCD spectra. , 2012, Journal of proteome research.

[4]  Jesse G. Meyer,et al.  Charge State Coalescence During Electrospray Ionization Improves Peptide Identification by Tandem Mass Spectrometry , 2012, Journal of The American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[5]  Nuno Bandeira,et al.  Peptide Identification by Tandem Mass Spectrometry with Alternate Fragmentation Modes* , 2012, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[6]  Matthias Mann,et al.  Consecutive proteolytic digestion in an enzyme reactor increases depth of proteomic and phosphoproteomic analysis. , 2012, Analytical chemistry.

[7]  K. Clauser,et al.  Modification Site Localization Scoring: Strategies and Performance , 2012, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[8]  M. Mann,et al.  System-wide Perturbation Analysis with Nearly Complete Coverage of the Yeast Proteome by Single-shot Ultra HPLC Runs on a Bench Top Orbitrap* , 2011, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[9]  Ronald J. Moore,et al.  Effectiveness of CID, HCD, and ETD with FT MS/MS for degradomic-peptidomic analysis: comparison of peptide identification methods. , 2011, Journal of proteome research.

[10]  P. Pevzner,et al.  Target-Decoy Approach and False Discovery Rate: When Things May Go Wrong , 2011, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[11]  Ronald J. Moore,et al.  Reversed‐phase chromatography with multiple fraction concatenation strategy for proteome profiling of human MCF10A cells , 2011, Proteomics.

[12]  P. Pevzner,et al.  The Generating Function of CID, ETD, and CID/ETD Pairs of Tandem Mass Spectra: Applications to Database Search* , 2010, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[13]  Matthias Mann,et al.  Mass spectrometry–based proteomics in cell biology , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[14]  J. Coon,et al.  Value of using multiple proteases for large-scale mass spectrometry-based proteomics. , 2010, Journal of proteome research.

[15]  Yan Zhao Intensity-based protein identification by machine learning from a library of tandem mass spectra , 2010 .

[16]  K. Gevaert,et al.  Improved visualization of protein consensus sequences by iceLogo , 2009, Nature Methods.

[17]  Matthias Mann,et al.  A Dual Pressure Linear Ion Trap Orbitrap Instrument with Very High Sequencing Speed* , 2009, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[18]  Masaru Tomita,et al.  Unbiased Quantitation of Escherichia coli Membrane Proteome Using Phase Transfer Surfactants* , 2009, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[19]  Rainer Malik,et al.  Evaluation of the low-specificity protease elastase for large-scale phosphoproteome analysis. , 2008, Analytical chemistry.

[20]  G. McAlister,et al.  Decision tree–driven tandem mass spectrometry for shotgun proteomics , 2008, Nature Methods.

[21]  M. Mann,et al.  Comprehensive mass-spectrometry-based proteome quantification of haploid versus diploid yeast , 2008, Nature.

[22]  Robert Burke,et al.  ProteoWizard: open source software for rapid proteomics tools development , 2008, Bioinform..

[23]  P. Pevzner,et al.  Spectral probabilities and generating functions of tandem mass spectra: a strike against decoy databases. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.

[24]  Masaru Tomita,et al.  Phase transfer surfactant-aided trypsin digestion for membrane proteome analysis. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.

[25]  T. von der Haar,et al.  Optimized Protein Extraction for Quantitative Proteomics of Yeasts , 2007, PloS one.

[26]  George C Tseng,et al.  Statistical characterization of the charge state and residue dependence of low-energy CID peptide dissociation patterns. , 2005, Analytical chemistry.

[27]  R. Aebersold,et al.  A uniform proteomics MS/MS analysis platform utilizing open XML file formats , 2005, Molecular systems biology.

[28]  Dietrich A Volmer,et al.  Ion activation methods for tandem mass spectrometry. , 2004, Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS.

[29]  J. Shabanowitz,et al.  Peptide and protein sequence analysis by electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  John R Yates,et al.  Influence of basic residue content on fragment ion peak intensities in low-energy collision-induced dissociation spectra of peptides. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[31]  R. Aebersold,et al.  A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[32]  J. Yates,et al.  Statistical characterization of ion trap tandem mass spectra from doubly charged tryptic peptides. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[33]  Alexey I Nesvizhskii,et al.  Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[34]  John I. Clark,et al.  Shotgun identification of protein modifications from protein complexes and lens tissue , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  D. Agard,et al.  Energetic landscape of alpha-lytic protease optimizes longevity through kinetic stability. , 2002, Nature.

[36]  A. Krogh,et al.  Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  V. Wysocki,et al.  Mobile and localized protons: a framework for understanding peptide dissociation. , 2000, Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS.

[38]  D A Agard,et al.  Unfolded conformations of alpha-lytic protease are more stable than its native state. , 1998, Nature.

[39]  D. Agard,et al.  Kinetic and structural characterization of mutations of glycine 216 in alpha-lytic protease: a new target for engineering substrate specificity. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[40]  D. Agard,et al.  Functional linkage between the active site of alpha-lytic protease and distant regions of structure: scanning alanine mutagenesis of a surface loop affects activity and substrate specificity. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  W. Rutter,et al.  Role of the S' subsites in serine protease catalysis. Active-site mapping of rat chymotrypsin, rat trypsin, alpha-lytic protease, and cercarial protease from Schistosoma mansoni. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[42]  P. Jennings,et al.  Random mutagenesis of the substrate-binding site of a serine protease can generate enzymes with increased activities and altered primary specificities. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[43]  D. Baker,et al.  A protein-folding reaction under kinetic control , 1992, Nature.

[44]  David A. Agard,et al.  Structural plasticity broadens the specificity of an engineered protease , 1989, Nature.

[45]  D. Agard,et al.  Analysis of prepro-alpha-lytic protease expression in Escherichia coli reveals that the pro region is required for activity , 1989, Journal of bacteriology.