Comparison of satellite- and ground-based NDVI above different land-use types

In order to evaluate the use of satellite (moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer: MODIS) and ground-measured (hyperspectral spectrometer and broadband micrometeorological sensors) normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), this study compares NDVI derived from five experimental (FLUXNET) field sites (grassland, winter wheat, corn, spruce, and beech) in Germany in June 2006 and April-September 2007. In addition, the spatial variability of ground radiation measured within one specific land-use class (for grass and winter wheat) was investigated to analyze the accuracy of the FLUXNET tower values. Furthermore, the angular dependence of spectrometer values on viewing angles was determined in order to enhance the spatial representativeness of spectrometer measurements which, especially above trees, are affected by soil parts and the tower structure when measured in nadir. The best agreement between the satellite- and ground-measured NDVI was found for winter wheat (2006) with values from 0.79–0.88 followed by grass (2006), showing NDVI values between 0.71 and 0.86. The spatial variability of NDVI within one land-use type was lower than the differences caused by the different NDVI determination methods. Above more open canopies (corn, beech), spectrometer measurements with 60° viewing angle in solar plane direction were found to better correspond to satellite-derived NDVI. Together with broadband NDVI, our ground-based results can complement satellite-derived NDVI.

[1]  A. Huete,et al.  MODIS Vegetation Index Compositing Approach: A Prototype with AVHRR Data , 1999 .

[2]  Lalit Kumar,et al.  Imaging Spectrometry and Vegetation Science , 2001 .

[3]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  MODIS spectral signals at a flux tower site: Relationships with high-resolution data, and CO2 flux and light use efficiency measurements , 2006 .

[4]  Christian Bernhofer,et al.  A decade of carbon, water and energy flux measurements of an old spruce forest at the Anchor Station Tharandt , 2007 .

[5]  Corinna Rebmann,et al.  Spruce forests (Norway and Sitka spruce, including Douglas fir): Carbon and water fluxes, Balances, Ecological and ecophysiological determinants , 2003 .

[6]  Shilong Piao,et al.  NDVI-based increase in growth of temperate grasslands and its responses to climate changes in China , 2006 .

[7]  Y. H. Kerr,et al.  Monitoring vegetation cover across semi-arid regions: Comparison of remote observations from various scales , 2000 .

[8]  A. Skidmore,et al.  Discriminating tropical grass (Cenchrus ciliaris) canopies grown under different nitrogen treatments using spectroradiometry , 2003 .

[9]  A. Huete,et al.  Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices , 2002 .

[10]  J. Cihlar,et al.  Multitemporal, multichannel AVHRR data sets for land biosphere studies—Artifacts and corrections , 1997 .

[11]  Karl Fred Huemmrich,et al.  High temporal resolution NDVI phenology from micrometeorological radiation sensors , 1999 .

[12]  Jin Chen,et al.  Analysis of NDVI and scaled difference vegetation index retrievals of vegetation fraction , 2006 .

[13]  C. Justice,et al.  Atmospheric correction of MODIS data in the visible to middle infrared: first results , 2002 .

[14]  M. Sulev,et al.  Sources of errors in measurements of PAR , 2000 .

[15]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  Similarities in ground- and satellite-based NDVI time series and their relationship to physiological activity of a Scots pine forest in Finland , 2004 .

[16]  Tilden P. Meyers,et al.  Determining vegetation indices from solar and photosynthetically active radiation fluxes , 2007 .

[17]  Stuart E. Marsh,et al.  Biophysical characterization and management effects on semiarid rangeland observed from Landsat ETM+ data , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[18]  D. Hollinger,et al.  Refining light-use efficiency calculations for a deciduous forest canopy using simultaneous tower-based carbon flux and radiometric measurements , 2007 .

[19]  Arnaud Carrara,et al.  Biogeosciences Quality control of CarboEurope flux data – Part 1 : Coupling footprint analyses with flux data quality assessment to evaluate sites in forest ecosystems , 2008 .

[20]  M. Aubinet,et al.  Determinants of terrestrial ecosystem carbon balance inferred from European eddy covariance flux sites , 2007 .

[21]  Philip Lewis,et al.  Comparison of MODIS broadband albedo over an agricultural site with ground measurements and values derived from Earth observation data at a range of spatial scales , 2004, International Journal of Remote Sensing.

[22]  W. Oechel,et al.  FLUXNET: A New Tool to Study the Temporal and Spatial Variability of Ecosystem-Scale Carbon Dioxide, Water Vapor, and Energy Flux Densities , 2001 .

[23]  Alfredo Huete,et al.  A 20-year study of NDVI variability over the Northeast Region of Brazil , 2006 .

[24]  Hui Qing Liu,et al.  An error and sensitivity analysis of the atmospheric- and soil-correcting variants of the NDVI for the MODIS-EOS , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[25]  J. Qi,et al.  A comparative analysis of broadband and narrowband derived vegetation indices in predicting LAI and CCD of a cotton canopy , 2007 .

[26]  M. V. Til,et al.  SEASONAL VARIABILITY IN SPECTRAL REFLECTANCE OF COASTAL DUNE VEGETATION , 2004 .