An Extensible Data Enrichment Scheme for Providing Intelligent Services in Internet of Things Environments

Recent technologies in the Internet of Things (IoT) environment aim to provide intelligent services to users. Intelligent services can be managed and executed by systems that handle context information sets. Handling intelligent services leads to three major considerations: objects in the real world that should be described as metadata, a data enrichment procedure from sensing values for representing states, and controlling functionalities to manage services. In this study, an extensible data-enrichment scheme is proposed. The proposed scheme provides a way to describe profiles, data abstraction procedures, and functionalities that support the building of context information sets derived from raw datasets in the manner of a semantic web stack. Finally, data enrichment will help any system that uses context information by providing improved, understandable, and readable datasets to the service developers or the systems themselves.

[1]  Luca Mottola,et al.  Building Internet of Things software with ELIoT , 2016, Comput. Commun..

[2]  Christian Bonnet,et al.  Connect and Control Things: Integrating Lightweight IoT Framework into a Mobile Application , 2015, 2015 9th International Conference on Next Generation Mobile Applications, Services and Technologies.

[3]  Context-Aware Workflow Language Based on Web Services for Ubiquitous Computing , 2005, ICCSA.

[4]  Jorge A. Balazs,et al.  Opinion Mining and Information Fusion: A survey , 2016, Inf. Fusion.

[5]  Marco Stolpe,et al.  The Internet of Things: Opportunities and Challenges for Distributed Data Analysis , 2016, SIGKDD Explor..

[6]  Alan N. Steinberg,et al.  Revisions to the JDL data fusion model , 1999, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[7]  Armin Haller,et al.  SOSA: A Lightweight Ontology for Sensors, Observations, Samples, and Actuators , 2018, J. Web Semant..

[8]  Axel Polleres,et al.  Everything you always wanted to know about blank nodes , 2014, J. Web Semant..

[9]  Amedeo Cesta,et al.  A Holistic Approach to Behavior Adaptation for Socially Assistive Robots , 2020, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[10]  Satoshi Asano,et al.  Device collaboration framework in IoT-aggregator for realizing smart environment , 2016, 2016 TRON Symposium (TRONSHOW).

[11]  Ayman I. Kayssi,et al.  IoT survey: An SDN and fog computing perspective , 2018, Comput. Networks.

[12]  Azamat Shakhimardanov,et al.  Component-Based Robotic Engineering (Part II) , 2010, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[13]  Joern Ploennigs,et al.  Materializing the Promises of Cognitive IoT: How Cognitive Buildings Are Shaping the Way , 2018, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[14]  Andrew Waugh Specifying Metadata Standards for Metadata Tool Configuration , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[15]  Erik Blasch,et al.  JDL level 5 fusion model: user refinement issues and applications in group tracking , 2002, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[16]  Raoudha Ben Djemaa,et al.  QoC enhanced semantic IoT model , 2020, IDEAS.

[17]  Shirin Enshaeifar,et al.  IoT-Stream: A Lightweight Ontology for Internet of Things Data Streams and Its Use with Data Analytics and Event Detection Services † , 2020, Sensors.

[18]  Paolo Dario,et al.  Connecting ROS and FIWARE: Concepts and Tutorial , 2019 .

[19]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Towards a Better Understanding of Context and Context-Awareness , 1999, HUC.

[20]  Stefano Chessa,et al.  Internet of Robotic Things-Converging Sensing / Actuating , Hypoconnectivity , Artificial Intelligence and IoT Platforms , 2017 .

[21]  Hatem Ben Sta,et al.  Towards Achieving Semantic Interoperability in an IoT-enabled Smart Campus , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2).

[22]  Erik Blasch,et al.  Revisiting the JDL model for information exploitation , 2013, Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[23]  A. Unnikrishnan,et al.  On the divergence of information filter for multi sensors fusion , 2016, Inf. Fusion.

[24]  Tao Zhu,et al.  A Survey of Data Semantization in Internet of Things , 2018, Sensors.

[25]  M. Bedworth,et al.  The Omnibus model: a new model of data fusion? , 2000 .

[26]  Rik Van de Walle,et al.  Configuration of smart environments made simple: Combining visual modeling with semantic metadata and reasoning , 2014, 2014 International Conference on the Internet of Things (IOT).

[27]  Rong Zheng,et al.  IAPcloud: A Cloud Control Platform for Heterogeneous Robots , 2018, IEEE Access.

[28]  Daniel E. Koditschek,et al.  Sensor data fusion for body state estimation in a hexapod robot with dynamical gaits , 2006, IEEE Trans. Robotics.

[29]  Alain Bernard,et al.  Ontology-based knowledge representation for additive manufacturing , 2019, Comput. Ind..

[30]  Andrei Ciortea,et al.  Exploiting Interaction Affordances: On EngineeringAutonomous Systems for the Web of Things , 2019 .

[31]  Hajo Rijgersberg,et al.  Ontology of units of measure and related concepts , 2013, Semantic Web.

[32]  Florian Michahelles,et al.  Repurposing Manufacturing Lines on the Fly with Multi-agent Systems for the Web of Things , 2018, AAMAS.

[33]  Murvet Kirci,et al.  Data acquisition from greenhouses by using autonomous mobile robot , 2016, 2016 Fifth International Conference on Agro-Geoinformatics (Agro-Geoinformatics).

[34]  Anurag Agarwal,et al.  The Internet of Things—A survey of topics and trends , 2014, Information Systems Frontiers.

[35]  Odest Chadwicke Jenkins,et al.  Rosbridge: ROS for Non-ROS Users , 2011, ISRR.

[36]  Carolina Fortuna,et al.  Metadata management for the web of things: a practical perspective , 2012, WOT '12.

[37]  Stavros Vologiannidis,et al.  EUROPA — A ROS-based Open Platform for Educational Robotics , 2019, 2019 10th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology and Applications (IDAACS).

[38]  C. Schlegel,et al.  Model-driven engineering and run-time model-usage in service robotics , 2011, GPCE.

[39]  Seán O'Riain,et al.  A collaborative approach for metadata management for Internet of Things: Linking micro tasks with physical objects , 2013, 9th IEEE International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing.

[40]  Vangelis Metsis,et al.  IoT Middleware: A Survey on Issues and Enabling Technologies , 2017, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[41]  Matthias Kovatsch,et al.  Safe Interoperability for Web of Things Devices and Systems , 2020 .

[42]  Natàlia Hurtós,et al.  ROSPlan: Planning in the Robot Operating System , 2015, ICAPS.

[43]  Armin Haller,et al.  The modular SSN ontology: A joint W3C and OGC standard specifying the semantics of sensors, observations, sampling, and actuation , 2018, Semantic Web.

[44]  Detlef Gerhard,et al.  Context-awareness in industrial applications: definition, classification and use case , 2018 .

[45]  Krzysztof Janowicz,et al.  The Stimulus-Sensor-Observation Ontology Design Pattern and its Integration into the Semantic Sensor Network Ontology , 2010, SSN.

[46]  Yangwang Fang,et al.  An asynchronous sensor bias estimation algorithm utilizing targets' positions only , 2016, Inf. Fusion.

[47]  Ricardo Carelli,et al.  Agricultural Robotics: Unmanned Robotic Service Units in Agricultural Tasks , 2013, IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine.

[48]  E. Rovini,et al.  A Robot-Mediated Assessment of Tinetti Balance scale for Sarcopenia Evaluation in Frail Elderly* , 2019, 2019 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[49]  Filip De Turck,et al.  Semantics-based platform for context-aware and personalized robot interaction in the internet of robotic things , 2019, J. Syst. Softw..