The Influence of Fractal Dimension and Vegetation on the Perceptions of Streetscape Quality in Taipei: With Comparative Comments Made in Relation to Two British Case Studies

In this study we seek to determine the relationship between fractal dimension, the presence of vegetation, and pedestrian perception of streetscape in Taipei, Taiwan. We provide a fractal analysis of street vistas present in Taipei, calculate the amount of vegetation visible in the streets, and assess the perception of the visual quality characteristic of those streets. Correlations between the resultant fractal dimensions, the physical characteristics of the streets, and scores for a single measure of perceived visual quality are discussed and compared with the results from two similar British case studies. The key findings are that judgments of the visual quality of streetscapes are influenced by the presence of vegetation, but they are influenced more by changes in fractal dimension. Vegetation is shown have a strong, positive, and significant correlation with perceptions of variety, coherence, beauty, interest, and preference. Higher levels of vegetation were found in views that were judged as varied, coherent, beautiful, interesting, and likeable. The presence of visible sky and buildings in a view have negative correlations with judgments of variety and interest. The presence of visible boundaries, vehicles, signage, and street furniture all have strong positive correlations with judgments of complexity; conversely, they have strong negative correlations with judgments of order, coherence, and beauty. In the UK cases complexity was correlated positively with perceptions of visual quality, but in the Taiwanese case it was correlated negatively.

[1]  Bai-Lian Li,et al.  Fractal geometry applications in description and analysis of patch patterns and patch dynamics , 2000 .

[2]  Setsuko Mizuno,et al.  FRACTAL ANALYSIS OF STREET FORMS , 1990 .

[3]  Arthur E. Stamps,et al.  Psychology and the Aesthetics of the Built Environment , 2000 .

[4]  Daniel L. Ruderman,et al.  Origins of scaling in natural images , 1996, Vision Research.

[5]  Richard Taylor.  Science in culture , 2001, Nature.

[6]  J. Gliem,et al.  Calculating, Interpreting, And Reporting Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficient For Likert-Type Scales , 2003 .

[7]  Richard Vuduc,et al.  Image segmentation using fractal dimension , 2002 .

[8]  Dale Purves,et al.  A statistical explanation of visual space , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  Deborah J. Aks,et al.  Quantifying Aesthetic Preference for Chaotic Patterns , 1996 .

[10]  Michael Batty,et al.  URBAN SHAPES AS FRACTALS , 1987 .

[11]  A. Stamps.  Use of Static and Dynamic Media to Simulate Environments: A Meta-Analysis , 2010, Perceptual and motor skills.

[12]  J. M. Kittross.  The measurement of meaning , 1959 .

[13]  A. Stamps.  Use of Photographs to Simulate Environments: A Meta-Analysis , 1990 .

[14]  J. Cutting,et al.  Fractal curves and complexity , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  V. Rodin,et al.  THE FRACTAL DIMENSION OF TOKYO'S STREETS , 2000 .

[16]  Michael Batty,et al.  Fractal Cities: A Geometry of Form and Function , 1996 .

[17]  Benoit B. Mandelbrot,et al.  Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[18]  R. Richards,et al.  A New Aesthetic for Environmental Awareness: Chaos Theory, the Beauty of Nature, and Our Broader Humanistic Identity , 2001 .

[19]  Ben R. Newell,et al.  Fractals: A Resonance between Art and Nature , 2005 .

[20]  Arthur E. Stamps,et al.  Fractals, skylines, nature and beauty , 2002 .

[21]  Jon Cooper,et al.  Fractal Analysis of Street Vistas: A Potential Tool for Assessing Levels of Visual Variety in Everyday Street Scenes , 2008 .

[22]  PelegShmuel,et al.  Multiple Resolution Texture Analysis and Classification , 1984 .

[23]  Carl Bovill,et al.  Fractal geometry in architecture and design , 1995 .

[24]  Joseph Naor,et al.  Multiple Resolution Texture Analysis and Classification , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[25]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Fractal-Based Description of Natural Scenes , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[26]  Jack L. Nasar,et al.  The evaluative image of the city , 1997 .

[27]  P. Schmid,et al.  Fractal Properties of Habitat and Patch Structure in Benthic Ecosystems , 1999 .

[28]  James F. Palmer,et al.  Rating reliability and representation validity in scenic landscape assessments , 2001 .

[29]  Robert G. Hershberger.  Environmental aesthetics: A study of meaning and architecture , 1988 .

[30]  D. Berlyne.  Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value , 1970 .

[31]  Jon Cooper,et al.  Fractal Analysis and Perception of Visual Quality in Everyday Street Vistas , 2010 .

[32]  J. Wohlwill.  Environmental Aesthetics: The Environment as a Source of Affect , 1976 .

[33]  M. Denscombe.  The Good Research Guide: for small-scale social research projects , 1998 .

[34]  M. Batty.  New ways of looking at cities , 1995, Nature.

[35]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective , 1989 .

[36]  William Bialek,et al.  Statistics of Natural Images: Scaling in the Woods , 1993, NIPS.

[37]  Terry Purcell,et al.  Fractal dimension of landscape silhouette outlines as a predictor of landscape preference , 2004 .

[38]  Takashi Sato,et al.  FRACTAL IMAGE ANALYSIS OF NATURAL SCENES AND MEDICAL IMAGES , 1996 .

[39]  Toshinobu Oku,et al.  ON VISUAL COMPLEXITY ON THE URBAN SKYLINE , 1990 .

[40]  Ben R. Newell,et al.  Universal aesthetic of fractals , 2003, Comput. Graph..