Classification of the Open Abdomen Bjorck

Background: in 2009, a classification system for the open abdomen was introduced. the aim of such a classification is to aid the (1) description of the patient’s clinical course; (2) standardization of clinical guidelines for guiding open abdomen management; and (3) facilitation of comparisons between studies and heterogeneous patient populations, thus serving as an aid in clinical research. Methods: As part of the revision of the definitions and clinical guidelines performed by the World society of the Abdominal Compartment syndrome, this 2009 classification system was amended following a review of experiences in teaching and research and published as part of updated consensus statements and clinical practice guidelines in 2013. Among 29 articles citing the 2009 classification system, nine were cohort studies. they were reviewed as part of the classification revision process. A total of 542 patients (mean: 60, range: 9–160) had been classified. two problems with the previous classification system were identified: the definition of enteroatmospheric fistulae, and that an enteroatmospheric fistula was graded less severe than a frozen abdomen. Results: the following amended classification was proposed: Grade 1, without adherence between bowel and abdominal wall or fixity of the abdominal wall (lateralization), subdivided as follows: 1A, clean; 1b, contaminated; and 1C, with enteric leak. An enteric leak controlled by closure, exteriorization into a stoma, or a permanent enterocutaneous fistula is considered clean. Grade 2, developing fixation, subdivided as follows: 2A, clean; 2b, contaminated; and 2C, with enteric leak. Grade 3, frozen abdomen, subdivided

[1]  S. Acosta,et al.  Evaluation of the Open Abdomen Classification System: A Validity and Reliability Analysis , 2014, World Journal of Surgery.

[2]  A. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome: updated consensus definitions and clinical practice guidelines from the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome , 2013, Intensive Care Medicine.

[3]  P. Navsaria,et al.  Negative pressure wound therapy management of the “open abdomen” following trauma: a prospective study and systematic review , 2013, World Journal of Emergency Surgery.

[4]  C. Germer,et al.  Early repair of open abdomen with a tailored two-component mesh and conditioning vacuum packing: a safe alternative to the planned giant ventral hernia , 2012, Hernia.

[5]  S. Schneeberger,et al.  Open Abdomen Treatment with Dynamic Sutures and Topical Negative Pressure Resulting in a High Primary Fascia Closure Rate , 2012, World Journal of Surgery.

[6]  F. Verdam,et al.  Delayed Primary Closure of the Septic Open Abdomen with a Dynamic Closure System , 2011, World Journal of Surgery.

[7]  A. D'Hoore,et al.  Treatment of small-bowel fistulae in the open abdomen with topical negative-pressure therapy. , 2011, American journal of surgery.

[8]  S. Armen,et al.  Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma: a review of the management of the open abdomen--part 2 "Management of the open abdomen". , 2011, The Journal of trauma.

[9]  M. Björck,et al.  Closure of the open abdomen. , 2011, The American surgeon.

[10]  A. Wanhainen,et al.  Multicentre prospective study of fascial closure rate after open abdomen with vacuum and mesh‐mediated fascial traction , 2011, The British journal of surgery.

[11]  P. Mentula Non-traumatic causes and the management of the open abdomen. , 2011, Minerva chirurgica.

[12]  G. Dionigi,et al.  Fascia-to-fascia closure with abdominal topical negative pressure for severe abdominal infections: preliminary results in a department of general surgery and intensive care unit. , 2010, Surgical infections.

[13]  T. Dahl,et al.  Early results after treatment of open abdomen after aortic surgery with mesh traction and vacuum-assisted wound closure. , 2010, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[14]  A. Leppäniemi Laparostomy: why and when? , 2010, Critical care.

[15]  A. Leppäniemi,et al.  Prophylactic open abdomen in patients with postoperative intra-abdominal hypertension , 2010, Critical care.

[16]  M. Björck,et al.  Classification—Important Step to Improve Management of Patients with an Open Abdomen , 2009, World Journal of Surgery.

[17]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Use of GRADE grid to reach decisions on clinical practice guidelines when consensus is elusive , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  M. Björck,et al.  Vacuum-assisted Wound Closure and Mesh-mediated Fascial Traction—A Novel Technique for Late Closure of the Open Abdomen , 2007, World Journal of Surgery.

[19]  K. Hillman,et al.  Results from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-abdominal Hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. II. Recommendations , 2006, Intensive Care Medicine.

[20]  R. Badenes,et al.  [Abdominal compartment syndrome and acute intestinal distress syndrome]. , 2013, Medicina intensiva.

[21]  H. Lippert,et al.  [Temporary abdominal closure and early and late pathophysiological consequences of treating an open abdomen]. , 2011, Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie.

[22]  M. Björck,et al.  Delayed abdominal closure for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair , 2009 .

[23]  K. Hillman,et al.  Results from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-abdominal Hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. I. Definitions , 2006, Intensive Care Medicine.

[24]  Swanson Mc,et al.  The open abdomen: aetiology, classification and current management strategies. , 2005, Journal of wound care.

[25]  J Bakker,et al.  Abdominal compartment syndrome , 2004 .

[26]  GrADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations , 2022 .