The homophone effect during visual word recognition in children: an fMRI study

Functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to investigate the role of phonology in visual word recognition (VWR). A group of children between the ages of 7 and 13 participated in a lexical decision task in which lexical frequency and homophony were manipulated. A significant homophone effect was observed for the high-frequency condition, indicating that phonology does indeed play a significant role in VWR. The brain activation patterns also support this idea in that regions that have been linked to phonological processing, the inferior frontal gyrus and the inferior parietal lobe, also revealed a homophone effect. Additionally, the posterior superior temporal cortex showed a homophone effect; however, this activation is argued to be related to lexical competition generated by the high-frequency homophone via the activation of multiple semantic representations.

[1]  J. Ziegler,et al.  MROM-p: An Interactive Activation, Multiple Readout Model of Orthographic and Phonological Processes in Visual Word Recognition , 2013 .

[2]  C. Perfetti,et al.  Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and priming , 1991 .

[3]  W. Cowan.  The development of the brain. , 1979, Scientific American.

[4]  W. Levelt,et al.  The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components , 2004, Cognition.

[5]  M Coltheart,et al.  Children’s use of phonological encoding when reading for meaning , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[6]  Jeffrey R. Binder,et al.  Modulation of the semantic system by word imageability , 2005, NeuroImage.

[7]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  Disruption of posterior brain systems for reading in children with developmental dyslexia , 2002, Biological Psychiatry.

[8]  S E Shaywitz,et al.  Neurobiological studies of reading and reading disability. , 2001, Journal of communication disorders.

[9]  Mark Yates,et al.  Short article: Phonological neighbourhood spread facilitates lexical decisions , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[11]  James R. Booth,et al.  Development of Brain Mechanisms for Processing Orthographic and Phonologic Representations , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  S. Lupker,et al.  Ambiguity and visual word recognition: can feedback explain both homophone and polysemy effects? , 1999, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[13]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[14]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition , 1998 .

[15]  H. Lüders,et al.  Basal temporal language area. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[17]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[18]  Derek Besner,et al.  Phonological Encoding in the Lexical Decision Task , 1979 .

[19]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  The basis of consistency effects in word naming , 1990 .

[20]  J. Maisog,et al.  A positron emission tomographic study of impaired word recognition and phonological processing in dyslexic men. , 1997, Archives of neurology.

[21]  C Büchel,et al.  Brain regions involved in articulation , 1999, The Lancet.

[22]  C. Fiebach,et al.  The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: localizing syntactic and semantic processes. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  Bruce D. McCandliss,et al.  The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  Greg B. Simpson,et al.  The influence of phonological neighborhood on visual word perception , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[26]  Steven L. Miller,et al.  Neural deficits in children with dyslexia ameliorated by behavioral remediation: Evidence from functional MRI , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Richard Passingham,et al.  The Inferior Frontal Gyrus and Phonological Processing: An Investigation using rTMS , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  Visual word recognition is accompanied by covert articulation: evidence for a speech-like phonological representation , 2008, Psychological research.

[29]  Nancy K. Squires,et al.  Phonological Processing and the Role of Strategy in Silent Reading: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence , 1996, Brain and Language.

[30]  Margaret Wilson.  The case for sensorimotor coding in working memory , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[31]  J. Rumsey,et al.  Failure to activate the left temporoparietal cortex in dyslexia. An oxygen 15 positron emission tomographic study. , 1992, Archives of neurology.

[32]  William W. Graves,et al.  Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[33]  M. Just,et al.  The neural bases of sentence comprehension: a fMRI examination of syntactic and lexical processing. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  Sara J. Unsworth,et al.  The Impact of Reader Skill on Phonological processing in visual Word Recognition , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[35]  Thomas A Zeffiro,et al.  Development of neural mechanisms for reading , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  Emmanuel Mellet,et al.  Picture naming without Broca's and Wernicke's area , 2000, Neuroreport.

[37]  S. Bookheimer,et al.  Regional cerebral blood flow during object naming and word reading , 1995 .

[38]  Manuel Martín-Loeches,et al.  The Recognition Potential: An ERP Index of Lexical Access , 1999, Brain and Language.

[39]  Penny M Pexman,et al.  The elusive nature of early phonological priming effects: Are there individual differences? , 2004, Brain and Language.

[40]  Mark S. Seidenberg.  The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems , 1985, Cognition.

[41]  D. Poeppel,et al.  The cortical organization of speech processing , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[42]  K. Rastle,et al.  Masked phonological priming effects in English: Are they real? Do they matter? , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[43]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and Performance VI , 1978 .

[44]  M. Just,et al.  Brain activation during sentence comprehension among good and poor readers. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[45]  R Frost,et al.  Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: true issues and false trails. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[46]  D Jared,et al.  Homophone effects in lexical decision. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.