Influence of File Motion on Shaping, Apical Debris Extrusion and Dentinal Defects: A Critical Review

Advances in endodontics have enabled the evolution of file manufacturing processes, improving performance beyond that of conventional files. In the present study, systems manufactured using state of the art methods and possessing special properties related to NiTi alloys (i.e., CM-Wire, M-Wire and R-Phase) were selected. The aim of this review was to provide a detailed analysis of the literature about the relationship between recently introduced NiTi files with different movement kinematics and shaping ability, apical extrusion of debris and dentin defects in root canal preparations. From March 2016 to January 2017, electronic searches were conducted in the PubMed and SCOPUS databases for articles published since January 2010. In vitro studies performed on extracted human teeth and published in English were considered for this review. Based on the inclusion criteria, 71 papers were selected for the analysis of full-text copies. Specific analysis was performed on 45 articles describing the effects of reciprocating, continuous and adaptive movements on the WaveOne Gold, Reciproc, HyFlex CM and Twisted File Adaptive systems. A wide range of testing conditions and methodologies have been used to compare the systems. Due the controversies among the results, the characteristics of the files used, such as their design and alloys, appear to be inconsistent to determine the best approach.

[1]  Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal Silva,et al.  Micro-CT Evaluation of Non-instrumented Canal Areas with Different Enlargements Performed by NiTi Systems. , 2015, Brazilian dental journal.

[2]  WooCheol Lee,et al.  Cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of two new nickel-titanium instruments used in reciprocation motion: Reciproc versus WaveOne. , 2012, Journal of endodontics.

[3]  Jia Ye,et al.  Metallurgical characterization of M-Wire nickel-titanium shape memory alloy used for endodontic rotary instruments during low-cycle fatigue. , 2012, Journal of endodontics.

[4]  E. Schäfer,et al.  Incidence of dentinal defects after root canal preparation: reciprocating versus rotary instrumentation. , 2013, Journal of endodontics.

[5]  Y. Ustun,et al.  The effects of different nickel-titanium instruments on dentinal microcrack formations during root canal preparation , 2015, European journal of dentistry.

[6]  R. Arbab-Chirani,et al.  Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of canal transportation instrumented by different kinematics rotary nickel-titanium instruments. , 2014, Journal of endodontics.

[7]  R Arbab-Chirani,et al.  Effects of three nickel titanium instrument systems on root canal geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography. , 2015, International endodontic journal.

[8]  Abbas Mohammadi,et al.  In vitro investigation of the cleaning efficacy, shaping ability, preparation time and file deformation of continuous rotary, reciprocating rotary and manual instrumentations in primary molars , 2016, Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects.

[9]  T. Dammaschke,et al.  Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. , 2012, International endodontic journal.

[10]  Rossella Bedini,et al.  A new software for dimensional measurements in 3D endodontic root canal instrumentation. , 2012, Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita.

[11]  C. Yıldırım,et al.  Effect of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid gel on the incidence of dentinal cracks caused by three novel nickel-titanium systems. , 2015, Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc.

[12]  E. Schäfer,et al.  Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems. , 2012, Journal of endodontics.

[13]  Ya Shen,et al.  Micro-computed tomography evaluation of the preparation of mesiobuccal root canals in maxillary first molars with Hyflex CM, Twisted Files, and K3 instruments. , 2013, Journal of endodontics.

[14]  H. Arslan,et al.  Dentinal crack formation during root canal preparations by the twisted file adaptive, ProTaper Next, ProTaper Universal, and WaveOne instruments. , 2015, Journal of endodontics.

[15]  M. Torabinejad,et al.  Inflammatory and immunological aspects of the pathogenesis of human periapical lesions. , 1985, Journal of endodontics.

[16]  Euiseong Kim,et al.  Kinematic Effects of Nickel-Titanium Instruments with Reciprocating or Continuous Rotation Motion: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies. , 2016, Journal of endodontics.

[17]  H. Arslan,et al.  Apically Extruded Debris during Root Canal Preparation using ProTaper Gold, ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, and RECIPROC Instruments , 2016, The International journal of artificial organs.

[18]  E. Schäfer,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris with different single-file systems: Reciproc, F360 and OneShape versus Mtwo. , 2014, International endodontic journal.

[19]  Beatriz Vilas Navós,et al.  Centering and transportation: in vitro evaluation of continuous and reciprocating systems in curved root canals , 2016, Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD.

[20]  Yan Lu,et al.  Comparison of apical and coronal extrusions using reciprocating and rotary instrumentation systems , 2015, BMC oral health.

[21]  G Gambarini,et al.  Cyclic fatigue testing of ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments after clinical use. , 2004, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[22]  V. Vincenzi,et al.  Bending properties of a new nickel-titanium alloy with a lower percent by weight of nickel. , 2011, Journal of endodontics.

[23]  James L Gutmann,et al.  Evaluation of the impact of raw materials on the fatigue and mechanical properties of ProFile Vortex rotary instruments. , 2012, Journal of endodontics.

[24]  H. Topçuoğlu,et al.  Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal preparation in primary molar teeth using three different rotary systems and hand files. , 2016, International journal of paediatric dentistry.

[25]  E. Schäfer,et al.  Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, iRaCe and Hyflex CM rotary NiTi files in severely curved root canals. , 2015, International endodontic journal.

[26]  S. Seltzer,et al.  Flare-ups in endodontics: I. Etiological factors. , 1985, Journal of endodontics.

[27]  Hakan Arslan,et al.  Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals. , 2014, Journal of endodontics.

[28]  H. Arslan,et al.  Incidence of Dentinal Cracks after Root Canal Preparation with Twisted File Adaptive Instruments Using Different Kinematics. , 2015, Journal of endodontics.

[29]  G. De-Deus,et al.  Comparison of apically extruded debris after large apical preparations by full-sequence rotary and single-file reciprocating systems. , 2016, International endodontic journal.

[30]  Shuai Wang,et al.  Comparison of dentinal and apical crack formation caused by four different nickel-titanium rotary and reciprocating systems in large and small canals. , 2015, Dental materials journal.

[31]  J. Surakanti,et al.  Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal preparation using ProTaper™, Hyflex™ and Waveone™ rotary systems , 2014, Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD.

[32]  J. Siqueira Microbial causes of endodontic flare-ups. , 2003, International endodontic journal.

[33]  E. J. Lima,et al.  Apically extruded dentin debris by reciprocating single-file and multi-file rotary system , 2014, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[34]  J. Webber Shaping canals with confidence: WaveOne GOLD single-file reciprocating system , 2016 .

[35]  Annil Dhingra,et al.  Evaluation of Single File Systems Reciproc, Oneshape, and WaveOne using Cone Beam Computed Tomography -An In Vitro Study. , 2015, Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR.

[36]  G. Saygili,et al.  Assessment of apically extruded debris and irrigant produced by different nickel-titanium instrument systems. , 2014, Brazilian oral research.

[37]  A. Kuştarcı,et al.  Efficacy of Laser Activated Irrigation on Apically Extruded Debris with Different Preparation Systems. , 2015, Photomedicine and laser surgery.

[38]  H. Gerstein,et al.  An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. , 1988, Journal of endodontics.

[39]  E Schäfer,et al.  Shaping ability of different single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. , 2013, International endodontic journal.

[40]  E. Karataş,et al.  Influence of Instruments Used in Root Canal Preparation on Amount of Apically Extruded Debris. , 2016, Artificial Organs.

[41]  Ove A Peters,et al.  Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. , 2004, Journal of endodontics.

[42]  J. D. PÉcora,et al.  Shaping ability of single-file reciprocating and heat-treated multifile rotary systems: a micro-CT study. , 2015, International endodontic journal.

[43]  S. Seltzer,et al.  Flare-ups in endodontics: I. Etiological factors. 1985. , 2004, Journal of endodontics.

[44]  M. Gerbi,et al.  Apical Extrusion of Debris Produced during Continuous Rotating and Reciprocating Motion , 2015, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[45]  Richard Gergi,et al.  Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of twisted files, Pathfile-ProTaper system, and stainless steel hand K-files by using computed tomography. , 2010, Journal of endodontics.

[46]  H. Arslan,et al.  An in vitro comparison of apically extruded debris and instrumentation times with ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, Twisted File Adaptive, and HyFlex instruments. , 2014, Journal of endodontics.

[47]  F. Mannocci,et al.  Shaping ability of two nickel–titanium instruments activated by continuous rotation or adaptive motion: a micro-computed tomography study , 2016, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[48]  P. Tawil,et al.  Visualization Enhancement of Dentinal Defects by Using Light-Emitting Diode Transillumination. , 2016, Journal of endodontics.

[49]  A. L. Kirchhoff,et al.  Apical extrusion of debris in flat-oval root canals after using different instrumentation systems. , 2015, Journal of endodontics.

[50]  M. Yazdizadeh,et al.  Effects of Reciproc, Mtwo and ProTaper Instruments on Formation of Root Fracture , 2015, Iranian endodontic journal.

[51]  A. Naaman,et al.  Dentinal crack formation during root canal preparations by the twisted file adaptive, Reciproc and WaveOne instruments , 2015, European journal of dentistry.

[52]  D. Altunbaş,et al.  Shaping ability of reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems in simulated curved canals , 2015, European journal of dentistry.

[53]  T. Eliades,et al.  A metallurgical characterization of ten endodontic Ni-Ti instruments: assessing the clinical relevance of shape memory and superelastic properties of Ni-Ti endodontic instruments. , 2010, International endodontic journal.

[54]  Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal Silva,et al.  Lack of causal relationship between dentinal microcracks and root canal preparation with reciprocation systems. , 2014, Journal of endodontics.

[55]  H. Arslan,et al.  Comparison of apically extruded debris after root canal instrumentation using Reciproc(®) instruments with various kinematics. , 2016, International endodontic journal.

[56]  L. Khojastepour,et al.  A Comparison of Apical Transportation in Severely Curved Canals Induced by Reciproc and BioRaCe Systems , 2014, Iranian endodontic journal.

[57]  Seok-Woo Chang,et al.  Shaping ability of the conventional nickel-titanium and reciprocating nickel-titanium file systems: a comparative study using micro-computed tomography. , 2014, Journal of endodontics.

[58]  L. Khojastepour,et al.  Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Assessment of Root Canal Transportation by Neoniti and Reciproc Single-File Systems , 2016, Iranian endodontic journal.

[59]  T. Tunç,et al.  Apical extrusion of debris using reciprocating files and rotary instrumentation systems , 2016, Nigerian journal of clinical practice.

[60]  A. Keleş,et al.  Comparative evaluation of root canal preparations of maxillary first molars with self-adjusting file, reciproc single file, and revo-s rotary file: A micro-computed tomography study. , 2015, Scanning.

[61]  A. Versluis,et al.  Potential relationship between design of nickel-titanium rotary instruments and vertical root fracture. , 2010, Journal of endodontics.