A new interface element with progressive damage and osseointegration for modeling of interfaces in hip resurfacing

Finite element models of orthopedic implants such as hip resurfacing femoral components usually rely on contact elements to model the load-bearing interfaces that connect bone, cement and implant. However, contact elements cannot simulate progressive degradation of bone–cement interfaces or osseointegration. A new interface element is developed to alleviate these shortcomings. This element is capable of simulating the nonlinear progression of bone–cement interface debonding or bone–implant interface osseointegration, based on mechanical stimuli in normal and tangential directions. The new element is applied to a hip resurfacing femoral component with a stem made of a novel biomimetic composite material. Three load cases are applied sequentially to simulate the 6-month period required for osseointegration of the stem. The effect of interdigitation depth of the bone–cement interface is found to be negligible, with only minor variations of micromotions. Numerical results show that the biomimetic stem progressively osseointegrates (α averages 0.7 on the stem surface, with spot-welds) and that bone–stem micromotions decrease below 10 µm. Osseointegration also changes the load path within the femoral bone: a decrease of 300 µε was observed in the femoral head, and the inferomedial part of the femoral neck showed a slight increase of 165 µε. There was also increased stress in the implant stem (from 7 to 11 MPa after osseointegration), indicating that part of the load is supported through the stem. The use of the new osseointegratable interface element has shown the osseointegration potential of the biomimetic stem. Its ability to model partially osseointegrated interfaces based on the mechanical conditions at the interface means that the new element could be used to study load transfer and osseointegration patterns on other models of uncemented hip resurfacing femoral components.

[1]  N. Verdonschot,et al.  Micromechanics of postmortem‐retrieved cement–bone interfaces , 2010, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[2]  S. Vowler,et al.  Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral implant in metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasty: minimum of two years follow-up. , 2005, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[3]  José Manuel García-Aznar,et al.  Modelling the mechanical behaviour of living bony interfaces , 2007 .

[4]  B. Pal,et al.  Design considerations for ceramic resurfaced femoral head: effect of interface characteristics on failure mechanisms , 2010, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[5]  C. Bünger,et al.  Tissue ingrowth into titanium and hydroxyapatite‐coated implants during stable and unstable mechanical conditions , 1992, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[6]  P. Griss,et al.  Implant fixation by bone ingrowth. , 1999, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[7]  Nico Verdonschot,et al.  Finite element simulation of cement‐bone interface micromechanics: A comparison to experimental results , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[8]  W. Harris,et al.  Differences in stiffness of the interface between a cementless porous implant and cancellous bone in vivo in dogs due to varying amounts of implant motion. , 1996, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[9]  José Manuel García-Aznar,et al.  Modelling the mixed-mode failure of cement¿bone interfaces , 2006 .

[10]  Amos Race,et al.  Mechanics of bone/PMMA composite structures: an in vitro study of human vertebrae. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  M Honl,et al.  Duration and frequency of every day activities in total hip patients. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Manuel Doblaré,et al.  Computational modelling of bone cement polymerization: Temperature and residual stresses , 2009, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[13]  M. A. Crisfield,et al.  Progressive Delamination Using Interface Elements , 1998 .

[14]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Implant–bone interface healing and adaptation in resurfacing hip replacement , 2012, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[15]  S M Kurtz,et al.  Biomechanics of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[16]  M Taylor,et al.  Finite element analysis of the resurfaced femoral head. , 2006, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[17]  S. Vowler,et al.  FEMORAL NECK RESORPTION AFTER HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY – A COMPARISON OF CEMENTED AND UNCEMENTED PROSTHESES , 2006 .

[18]  M. Lavigne,et al.  Anisotropic bone remodeling of a biomimetic metal-on-metal hip resurfacing implant. , 2012, Medical engineering & physics.

[19]  Manuel Doblaré,et al.  Analysis of the debonding of the stem–cement interface in intramedullary fixation using a non-linear fracture mechanics approach , 2005 .

[20]  P. Foguet,et al.  Narrowing of the Femoral Neck after Resurfacing Arthroplasty of the Hip: A Comparison of Cemented and Uncemented Femoral Components , 2010, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.

[21]  Giulio Alfano,et al.  An interface element formulation for the simulation of delamination with buckling , 2001 .

[22]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  Michael M Morlock,et al.  Load-shift--numerical evaluation of a new design philosophy for uncemented hip prostheses. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  M. Heller,et al.  Stair climbing is more critical than walking in pre-clinical assessment of primary stability in cementless THA in vitro. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  P R Fernandes,et al.  A contact model with ingrowth control for bone remodelling around cementless stems. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  G. Beaupré,et al.  Osseointegration of total hip arthroplasties: studies in humans and animals. , 1999, Journal of long-term effects of medical implants.

[27]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Analysis of cementless implants using interface nonlinear friction--experimental and finite element studies. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Musculo-skeletal loading conditions at the hip during walking and stair climbing. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  G. Niebur,et al.  Bone ingrowth into a porous coated implant predicted by a mechano-regulatory tissue differentiation algorithm , 2008, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[30]  J. Yang,et al.  Mechanical properties of acrylic bone cement containing PMMA-SiO2 hybrid sol-gel material. , 1997, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[31]  Pascal Swider,et al.  A predictive mechano-biological model of the bone-implant healing , 2006 .

[32]  R. B. Ashman,et al.  Relations of mechanical properties to density and CT numbers in human bone. , 1995, Medical engineering & physics.

[33]  M. Crisfield,et al.  Finite element interface models for the delamination analysis of laminated composites: mechanical and computational issues , 2001 .

[34]  M J Allen,et al.  Mixed‐mode failure response of the cement–bone interface , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[35]  P. Beaulé,et al.  2008 Otto Aufranc Award: Component Design and Technique Affect Cement Penetration in Hip Resurfacing , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[36]  Stuart B Goodman,et al.  A conical-collared intramedullary stem can improve stress transfer and limit micromotion. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[37]  S. Gupta,et al.  A numerical study of failure mechanisms in the cemented resurfaced femur: Effects of interface characteristics and bone remodelling , 2009, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[38]  M. Tho Bone and Joints Modelling with Individualized Geometric and Mechanical Properties Derived from Medical Images , 2003 .

[39]  R. Huiskes,et al.  A clinical, radiological and biomechanical study of the TARA hip prosthesis , 2004, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[40]  T. Gross,et al.  Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with an uncemented femoral component. A seven-year follow-up study. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[41]  J. Moskal,et al.  The porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis: 11- to 13-year results. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.