Binaural interference in bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.

This work was aimed at determining whether binaural interference occurs in electric hearing, and if so, whether it occurs as a consequence of perceptual grouping (central explanation) or if it is related to the spread of excitation in the cochlea (peripheral explanation). Six bilateral cochlear-implant listeners completed a series of experiments in which they judged the lateral position of a target pulse train, lateralized via interaural time or level differences, in the presence of an interfering diotic pulse train. The target and interferer were presented at widely separated electrode pairs (one basal and one apical). The results are broadly similar to those reported for acoustic hearing. All listeners but one showed significant binaural interference in at least one of the stimulus conditions. In all cases of interference, a robust recovery was observed when the interferer was presented as part of an ongoing stream of identical pulse trains, suggesting that the interference was at least partly centrally mediated. Overall, the results suggest that both simultaneous and sequential grouping mechanisms operate in electric hearing, at least for stimuli with a wide tonotopic separation.

[1]  R. Carlyon,et al.  Concurrent Sound Segregation in Electric and Acoustic Hearing , 2007, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[2]  Robert F Labadie,et al.  Interaural Time and Level Difference Thresholds for Acoustically Presented Signals in Post-Lingually Deafened Adults Fitted with Bilateral Cochlear Implants Using CIS+ Processing , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[3]  R. Tyler,et al.  Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  W. Baumgartner,et al.  Effects of interaural time differences in fine structure and envelope on lateral discrimination in electric hearing. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  T. Dau,et al.  Auditory stream formation affects comodulation masking release retroactively. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  C Trahiotis,et al.  Binaural interference effects measured with masking-level difference and with ITD- and IID-discrimination paradigms. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Piotr Majdak,et al.  Binaural jitter improves interaural time-difference sensitivity of cochlear implantees at high pulse rates , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Mark A Stellmack,et al.  Observer weighting strategies in interaural time-difference discrimination and monaural level discrimination for a multi-tone complex. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  R. Dye,et al.  The combination of interaural information across frequencies: the effects of number and spacing of components, onset asynchrony, and harmonicity. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  C Trahiotis,et al.  Extents of laterality and binaural interference effects. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  D. McFadden,et al.  Lateralization of high frequencies based on interaural time differences. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Leslie R Bernstein,et al.  The apparent immunity of high-frequency "transposed" stimuli to low-frequency binaural interference. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Brian Roberts,et al.  Auditory stream segregation in cochlear implant listeners: measures based on temporal discrimination and interleaved melody recognition. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  C Trahiotis,et al.  Interaural temporal discrimination using two sinusoidally amplitude-modulated, high-frequency tones: conditions of summation and interference. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  T N Buell,et al.  Combination of binaural information across frequency bands. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  P. M. Zurek Spectral dominance in sensitivity to interaural delay for broadband stimuli , 1985 .

[17]  Gail S Donaldson,et al.  Psychophysical recovery from pulse-train forward masking in electric hearing. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  C Trahiotis,et al.  Detectability of interaural delays over select spectral regions: effects of flanking noise. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  B. Roberts,et al.  Simultaneous Grouping in Cochlear Implant Listeners: Can Abrupt Changes in Level Be Used to Segregate Components from a Complex Tone? , 2010, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[20]  Brian Roberts,et al.  Auditory stream segregation of tone sequences in cochlear implant listeners , 2007, Hearing Research.

[21]  Anastasios Sarampalis,et al.  Auditory stream segregation with cochlear implants: A preliminary report , 2006, Hearing Research.

[22]  R. Litovsky,et al.  Interaural Time-Delay Sensitivity in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users: Effects of Pulse Rate, Modulation Rate, and Place of Stimulation , 2009, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[23]  T Dau,et al.  Modulation detection interference: effects of concurrent and sequential streaming. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Joan Besing,et al.  Interference and enhancement effects on interaural time discrimination and level discrimination in listeners with normal hearing and those with hearing loss. , 2004, American journal of audiology.

[25]  Piotr Majdak,et al.  Lateralization discrimination of interaural time delays in four-pulse sequences in electric and acoustic hearing. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  C. Trahiotis,et al.  Measures of extents of laterality for high-frequency "transposed" stimuli under conditions of binaural interference. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  R. Dye,et al.  The combination of interaural information across frequencies: lateralization on the basis of interaural delay. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  H S Colburn,et al.  Test of a model of auditory object formation using intensity and interaural time difference discrimination. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  B. Seeber,et al.  Localization cues with bilateral cochlear implants. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Robert S Hong,et al.  Pure-tone auditory stream segregation and speech perception in noise in cochlear implant recipients. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  Ruth Y Litovsky,et al.  Effect of age at onset of deafness on binaural sensitivity in electric hearing in humans. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  Virginia Best,et al.  Binaural interference and auditory grouping. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  Bernhard Laback,et al.  Sensitivity to Interaural Level and Envelope Time Differences of Two Bilateral Cochlear Implant Listeners Using Clinical Sound Processors , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[34]  C Trahiotis,et al.  Interference in detection of interaural delay in a sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tone produced by a second, spectrally remote sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tone. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  C. Darwin,et al.  Lateralization of a perturbed harmonic: effects of onset asynchrony and mistuning. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  W A Yost,et al.  Stimulus classification procedure for assessing the extent to which binaural processing is spectrally analytic or synthetic. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  L. Heller,et al.  Binaural interference in lateralization thresholds for interaural time and level differences. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.