A parameter optimization framework for determining the pseudo-rigid-body model of cantilever-beams

Abstract This paper focuses on developing a framework for determining the optimal pseudo-rigid-body (PRB) model of 2D cantilever beams. PRB models are commonly used in design and analysis of compliant mechanisms since they significantly reduce the number of degrees of freedom compared with the finite element approach. Although a number of PRB models are available in literature, there is not a unified method to determine the most suitable pseudo-rigid-body model for a specific application. In this work, we first study a modified Timoshenko beam equation which accommodates shear forces and axial deformation. The numerical solution to the Timoshenko beam equation provides a baseline for comparing various models. A novel concept of “PRB matrix” is proposed for representing topologies of all PRB models in a uniform way. The optimal set of kinematic parameters (characteristic lengths and spring constants) of PRB models are determined by minimizing the error of tip deflection and comparing with the solution of the Timoshenko beam equation. To validate this formulation, we compare the results with existing PRB models and obtained equivalent if not a more accurate set of PRB parameters. At last, a case study of a compliant slider mechanism is provided to demonstrate the accuracy of two PRB models in this particular application.

[1]  Sridhar Kota,et al.  Design of Compliant Mechanisms for Morphing Structural Shapes , 2003 .

[2]  A. Midha,et al.  Parametric Deflection Approximations for End-Loaded, Large-Deflection Beams in Compliant Mechanisms , 1995 .

[3]  Satyandra K. Gupta,et al.  Modeling and Optimization of a Miniature Elastomeric Compliant Mechanism Using a 3-Spring Pseudo Rigid Body Model , 2013 .

[4]  Satyandra K. Gupta,et al.  Characterization and Modeling of Elastomeric Joints in Miniature Compliant Mechanisms , 2012 .

[5]  Yue-Qing Yu,et al.  A pseudo-rigid-body 2R model of flexural beam in compliant mechanisms , 2012 .

[6]  Larry L. Howell,et al.  Evaluation of equivalent spring stiffness for use in a pseudo-rigid-body model of large-deflection compliant mechanisms , 1996 .

[7]  Anupam Saxena,et al.  A Simple and Accurate Method for Determining Large Deflections in Compliant Mechanisms Subjected to End Forces and Moments , 1998 .

[8]  Sridhar Kota,et al.  An Energy Formulation for Parametric Size and Shape Optimization of Compliant Mechanisms , 1999 .

[9]  Shusheng Bi,et al.  An effective pseudo-rigid-body method for beam-based compliant mechanisms , 2010 .

[10]  Hai-Jun Su,et al.  A Pseudorigid-Body 3R Model for Determining Large Deflection of Cantilever Beams Subject to Tip Loads , 2009 .

[11]  Larry L. Howell,et al.  A Method for the Design of Compliant Mechanisms With Small-Length Flexural Pivots , 1994 .

[12]  R. Merz,et al.  Shape Deposition Manufacturing , 1994 .

[13]  Larry L. Howell,et al.  A Pseudo-Rigid-Body Model for Initially-Curved Pinned-Pinned Segments Used in Compliant Mechanisms , 2001 .

[14]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  LXVI. On the correction for shear of the differential equation for transverse vibrations of prismatic bars , 1921 .

[15]  Shorya Awtar,et al.  Characteristics of Beam-Based Flexure Modules , 2007 .

[16]  Noboru Kikuchi,et al.  TOPOLOGY OPTIMIZATION OF COMPLIANT MECHANISMS USING THE HOMOGENIZATION METHOD , 1998 .

[17]  Nicholas G. Dagalakis,et al.  Kinematic modeling and calibration of a flexure based hexapod nanopositioner , 2013 .

[18]  Guimin Chen,et al.  Finding the optimal characteristic parameters for 3R pseudo-rigid-body model using an improved particle swarm optimizer , 2011 .

[19]  Mohammad H. Dado.  Variable parametric pseudo-rigid-body model for large-deflection beams with end loads , 2001 .

[20]  Larry L. Howell,et al.  Handbook of compliant mechanisms , 2013 .

[21]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Efficient human-like walking for the compliant huMANoid COMAN based on linematic Motion Primitives (kMPs) , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.