Attentional Cues in Real Scenes, Saccadic Targeting, and Bayesian Priors

Performance finding a target improves when artificial cues direct covert attention to the target's probable location or locations, but how do predictive cues help observers search for objects in real scenes? Controlling for target detectability and retinal eccentricity, we recorded observers' first saccades during search for objects that appeared in expected and unexpected locations within real scenes. As has been found with synthetic images and cues, accuracy of first saccades was significantly higher when the target appeared at an expected location rather than an unexpected location. Observers' saccades with target-absent images make it possible to distinguish two mechanisms that might mediate this effect: limited attentional resources versus differential weighting of information (Bayesian priors). Endpoints of first saccades in target-absent images were significantly closer to the expected than the unexpected locations, a result consistent with the differential-weighting model and inconsistent with limited resources being the sole mechanism underlying the effect.

[1]  Preeti Verghese,et al.  The psychophysics of visual search , 2000, Vision Research.

[2]  J. Findlay Saccade Target Selection During Visual Search , 1997, Vision Research.

[3]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[5]  J. Palmer,et al.  Measuring the effect of attention on simple visual search. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  S J Luck,et al.  Mechanisms of visual-spatial attention: resource allocation or uncertainty reduction? , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  P. Bennett,et al.  Letter localization, not discrimination, is constrained by attention. , 1995, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[8]  C. J. Downing Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: effects on perceptual quality. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  Eye movements during visual search: the costs of choosing the optimal path , 2001, Vision Research.

[10]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .

[11]  I Biederman,et al.  Do Background Depth Gradients Facilitate Object Identification? , 1981, Perception.

[12]  Miguel P Eckstein,et al.  Saccadic and perceptual performance in visual search tasks. I. Contrast detection and discrimination. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[13]  H. Basford,et al.  Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search , 2005 .

[14]  J. Henderson,et al.  The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing , 1999 .

[15]  R A Kinchla,et al.  Precue effects in visual search: Data or resource limited? , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  H. Hawkins,et al.  Visual attention modulates signal detectability. , 1990 .

[17]  J. Henderson Human gaze control during real-world scene perception , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  M. Morgan,et al.  Visual Search for a Tilted Target: Tests of Spatial Uncertainty Models , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[19]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Top-down control of visual attention in object detection , 2003, Proceedings 2003 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.03CH37429).

[20]  R VanRullen,et al.  Is it a Bird? Is it a Plane? Ultra-Rapid Visual Categorisation of Natural and Artifactual Objects , 2001, Perception.

[21]  W. W. Peterson,et al.  The theory of signal detectability , 1954, Trans. IRE Prof. Group Inf. Theory.

[22]  Miguel P Eckstein,et al.  Comparison of two weighted integration models for the cueing task: linear and likelihood. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[23]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detection. II. Signal-location identification. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[24]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Modeling global scene factors in attention. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[25]  Preeti Verghese,et al.  Comparing integration rules in visual search. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[26]  Miguel P Eckstein,et al.  The footprints of visual attention in the Posner cueing paradigm revealed by classification images. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[27]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual cueing of visual attention , 2022 .

[28]  P. Killeen,et al.  An Alternative to Null-Hypothesis Significance Tests , 2005, Psychological science.

[29]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  Eye movements during parallel-serial visual search. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  D. Ballard,et al.  Eye movements in natural behavior , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  Howard S. Bashinski,et al.  Enhancement of perceptual sensitivity as the result of selectively attending to spatial locations , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  Marilyn L Shaw,et al.  Attending to multiple sources of information: I. The integration of information in decision making , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  A. Yuille,et al.  Object perception as Bayesian inference. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[34]  C. Koch,et al.  A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention , 2000, Vision Research.

[35]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Covert attention enhances letter identification without affecting channel tuning. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[36]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Eye movements in iconic visual search , 2002, Vision Research.

[37]  Andrew Hollingworth,et al.  Eye Movements During Scene Viewing: An Overview , 1998 .