Ensuring Hinterland Access The Role of Port Authorities

n this paper, it is argued that port authorities can actively contribute to better hinterland access. Different types of involvement of the port authority are discussed, as well as reasons for such involvement. The analysis is explorative and aims to provide a basis for further discussion. The analysis applies to landlord port authorities (PAs) with public goals. Landlord port authorities have become more autonomous and take the initiative for expansion and redevelopment of port infrastructure. The activities of PAs can be classified in four broad categories: traffic management, customer management, area management and stakeholder management. PAs traditionally act as landlords but increasingly operate ‘beyond the landlord’ model. The main argument for a more active involvement of the PA is the fact that coordination in clusters as well as transport chains does not always emerge spontaneously, for various reasons. More coordination can lead to more efficient supply chains and more competitive ports. Consequently, PAs have incentives to invest to improve coordination in port clusters and supply chains.

[1]  Jean-Paul Rodrigue,et al.  Port regionalization: towards a new phase in port development , 2005 .

[2]  Peter W. de Langen,et al.  Analysis Of The Benefits Of Intra-Port Competition , 2006 .

[3]  Francesco Parola,et al.  The Time Scale of Internationalisation: The Case of the Container Port Industry , 2007 .

[4]  P. D. de Langen,et al.  Coordination in Hinterland Transport Chains: A Major Challenge for the Seaport Community , 2008 .

[5]  Y. Chen [The change of serum alpha 1-antitrypsin level in patients with spontaneous pneumothorax]. , 1995, Zhonghua jie he he hu xi za zhi = Zhonghua jiehe he huxi zazhi = Chinese journal of tuberculosis and respiratory diseases.

[6]  Stephen Gibson Incentivising operational performance on the UK rail infrastructure since 1996 , 2005 .

[7]  R. Robinson Ports as elements in value-driven chain systems: the new paradigm , 2002 .

[8]  B. Groothedde Collaborative logistics and transportation networks : A modelling approach to hub network design , 2005 .

[9]  A. Jacquemin,et al.  Barriers to Entry and Strategic Competition , 1990 .

[10]  Peter W. de Langen,et al.  Hinterland access regimes in seaports , 2003, Les Cahiers Scientifiques du Transport - Scientific Papers in Transportation.

[11]  Athanasios A. Pallis,et al.  Entry barriers in seaports , 2007, Port Economics, Management and Policy.

[12]  T. Notteboom,et al.  Structural changes in logistics: how will port authorities face the challenge? , 2001 .

[13]  Tae-Woo Lee,et al.  A new efficient EDI system for container cargo logistics , 2000 .

[14]  Alfred J. Baird,et al.  Privatization trends at the world's top-100 container ports , 2002 .

[15]  Nathalie Fabbe-Costes,et al.  Interacting standards - A basic element of logistics networks , 2006 .

[16]  A. Marshall Principles of Economics , .

[17]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1973 .

[18]  Sidney Gilman,et al.  Sustainability and national policy in UK port development , 2003 .

[19]  Peter W. de Langen,et al.  The Performance of Seaport Clusters; A Framework to Analyze Cluster Performance and an Application to the Seaport Clusters of Durban, Rotterdam and the Lower Mississippi , 2004 .

[20]  H. Schmitz,et al.  Collective Efficiency and Increasing Returns , 1997 .

[21]  C. Antonelli Collective Knowledge Communication and Innovation: The Evidence of Technological Districts , 2000 .

[22]  Theo Notteboom,et al.  Concession agreements as port governance tools , 2006 .